Author

Topic: [Awesome Miner] - Powerful Windows GUI to manage and monitor up to 200000 miners - page 380. (Read 703143 times)

jr. member
Activity: 61
Merit: 2
Coinwarz or Whattomine

Any info on differences?  The pros cons of each.

Thanks
newbie
Activity: 26
Merit: 0
I have 2 identical miners and for some reason, ever since the latest update one of the two keeps running into Failed pool status using the same profit switching configuration with Mining Pool Hub. It seems to keep failing out Equihash and NeoScrypt pools. I have to right click go to details and then Reset failed pools...it will work for an hour or so before going back to the same status.

These rigs are on the same network and there has been no other changes so I'm not sure what else it could be outside of the update. Is there any troubleshooting steps I can try?
member
Activity: 653
Merit: 11
Patrike please add suprminer for your default miners...
jr. member
Activity: 348
Merit: 5
Bug v4.6.5 (perhaps in the previous 2 releases ase well
=====

Most of the remote miners will show interface offline error (some green text, some with red text) when you have option window/profile editor opened for a little while (leave it for 3 minutes and it surely kicks in)

The miners are actually still online and API are accessible and so on, just AM not seem to probe, reading them properly while the Options Window is opened so might be an issue with Remote Agent in the latest builds
newbie
Activity: 32
Merit: 0
So which one is the best x16r miner so far to use in awesomeminer?

Seems like suprminer posted above. However tpruvot release ccminer 2.2.5 today. I haven't tested that yet.

edit: I tested ccminer 2.2.5 and it does not appear any faster than RavenMiner or suprminer with suprminer still being quickest.
member
Activity: 653
Merit: 11
So which one is the best x16r miner so far to use in awesomeminer?
newbie
Activity: 32
Merit: 0
https://github.com/ocminer/suprminer/releases/tag/1.5
Updated and Optimized Supminer ccMiner fork for X16r/X16S Mining

Yea this one made a bit of a difference. Steady state hashrate on my 1080ti/1070ti combo went from ~25MH/s to ~31MH/s for x16r. Looking at the changelog, there are a few other algorithms that seemed to have been changed but they don't bench any quicker than ccminer/ccminer-KlausT. Be sure to do a precise benchmark for it if you add it manually to Awesome Miner and then save your hashrate after mining for a while. It takes about 10 minutes or so to fully ramp up to the steady state speed.
newbie
Activity: 107
Merit: 0
Claymore's CryptoNote Windows CPU Miner v4.0   on: Today at 10:44:14 AM
4.0

- removed devfee, miner is completely free now.
- added "-pow7" option to support Monero hardfork, use "-pow7 1" value to enable it.
newbie
Activity: 77
Merit: 0
I need help I installed AM to one of my rig but it sometimes restarts and AM starts too but it doesn't start miner.Is there a way to make it auto start miner after restart?
jr. member
Activity: 241
Merit: 6
This thread is huge so I will go ahead and ask these two questions:

1. Can one rig use two different miners at the same time? For example if I have mixed nVidia and AMD cards on one rig, I'd like to set ccminer to mine lets say ravencoin and the AMD cards to mine ETH. Is this possible?
2. I suppose the rigs would need to have windows installed on them. Is it possible to boot them from USB without the need of a hard drive?
If your motherboard supports it, you could run windows from a usb drive, BUT, there is an issue with mining where you need to set your pagefile size to the size of all the memory on your graphics cards added together, which depending on your hardware could be quite large (my main rig has 1080tis for example so the pagefile size if I had all 6 cards would need to be 66 GB) I could imagine the usb bus speed being a bottleneck also, so I wouldn't really suggest it. What I would suggest from a performance standpoint is the fastest SSD you can find. I got the one I'm using for $52 on Amazon though it's only 120GB. If I had to do it over again (I guess it's not too late) I'd get 2 of them and use one just for the pagefile, though it would be an experiment, I think it would be superior, and if it didn't offer a solid performance gain, you could always just use it for the next system it was needed for.
jr. member
Activity: 348
Merit: 5
This thread is huge so I will go ahead and ask these two questions:

1. Can one rig use two different miners at the same time? For example if I have mixed nVidia and AMD cards on one rig, I'd like to set ccminer to mine lets say ravencoin and the AMD cards to mine ETH. Is this possible?
2. I suppose the rigs would need to have windows installed on them. Is it possible to boot them from USB without the need of a hard drive?

1. Yes, use the -d / -di directives in command line parameters in your case...other software can be configured similarly if they support device assignment

2. You can use linux too, but for Managed Profit Miners, then you'd have to use Windows I believe using Remote AM Service. Unless you use the premium version and implement your own rules and manually profit/profile/template/pool switch via API. as for Windows on USB, never tried to use them to mine, some others might be able to shed some light.
newbie
Activity: 14
Merit: 0
This thread is huge so I will go ahead and ask these two questions:

1. Can one rig use two different miners at the same time? For example if I have mixed nVidia and AMD cards on one rig, I'd like to set ccminer to mine lets say ravencoin and the AMD cards to mine ETH. Is this possible?
2. I suppose the rigs would need to have windows installed on them. Is it possible to boot them from USB without the need of a hard drive?
newbie
Activity: 107
Merit: 0
https://github.com/ocminer/suprminer/releases/tag/1.5
Updated and Optimized Supminer ccMiner fork for X16r/X16S Mining
jr. member
Activity: 348
Merit: 5
Also one observation.

My rigs have Machinecoin (MAC) set as a pool instead on online services at Zergpool...however, does the profitability information from Zerg overrides the coin profitability even if all Online Services are disabled?

Since individual profit profile in the Coins Tab displays say for example only, -$1.00 for Machinecoin (with information pulled and custom updated via API using Soothaa's plugin...which seems correct) however, when you open up View Details of the said miner, the profit puts it on top of all other pools @ $0.50....

I remember I had reflected similar issues in the past month about the discrepancy when online services and predefined multipool comes into play, but it was new to me that even with the online services explicitly disabled...it still override my coins profit data with the Yiimp api.

Similar thing might be also happening at MPH...where I have run into similar issue with Maxcoin...however, I have to dig in further to see if it was something else...since there was seemly issue at WhatToMine with some coins...that despite MAX being "active" there were no data for the coin at all until I manually add the URL for MAX's individual json (73.json)....


***
I'm keeping an eye on it to see if it was just a temp glitch since it only occurred in the past day or 2...and funny is that Zerg displayed even lower profit figure than that of zpool or Yiimp.eu yet the calculation went off the roof. That's happened for past day only and even with manual activating profit switch which supposedly recalculate the individual coin/pool profit rank within miner profile, it didn't resolve until about 30 minutes later with all sort of fiddling...Not reporting as a bug since I haven't also being able to reproduce it reliably.
jr. member
Activity: 348
Merit: 5
...

3: Given that mining has been less profitable of late with the drop on value of Crypto would it be possible to add the ability per profit profile or miner where if the profit per day for my miner/profit profile is less than X amount AM will tell the miner to stop mining (PC on but idle), then when the profit per day is above X amount to resume mining again? This way we can get the best "profit" between mining and electrical cost savings.


I've sent Patrike similar feedback a while back, this certainly will be a very welcomed feature addition for people who are more sensitive to the electricity cost factor. Of course, if it cannot be implemented in the near future, maybe we can have some sort of workaround that allows users to do so via API.

it will be (if easier to implement) great to have API method returning the Profit Switching tab data as per "View Details..." window. As far as I understand, these information are probably stored in the AM.xml and either you can generate API report manually or extract the portion from the XML. If that's the case, we can currently do a complicate workaround to get the data and implement our own profit switching rule but it's rather inefficient as the needless double calculation from some data AM already have stored somewhere...doing data modelling matching keys ... etc and finally to just set a rule.

Another Way if not via HTTP API, is to have a new Rule script user can run, that allows the action "Generate API Report" to be performed and store the API report in Filename of your choice (I think API report generated are for individual miner ATM) That way there are probably less effort extracting data on each miner from the main config XML and perhaps less complicated?
newbie
Activity: 17
Merit: 0
Correct.
The order of the graphics cards on the GPU tab is incorrectly displayed when you turn on the check-box to display the monitoring of system parameters (processor and memory frequencies).
Make the order of display of video cards as in the program of the miner.
newbie
Activity: 92
Merit: 0
Hello,
am i the only one having wrong stats regarding hmq1725 and zpool ?
What would be the correct profit factor ? 0.001 ?

Well, 24H Estimated by zpool is wrong now. Maybe for a short time

https://i.imgur.com/eqycFqP.jpg
https://i.imgur.com/XzkzeCj.jpg

Ok, that's why i encounter a problem. I use 24H estimated in AM...
newbie
Activity: 162
Merit: 0
Hello,
am i the only one having wrong stats regarding hmq1725 and zpool ?
What would be the correct profit factor ? 0.001 ?

Well, 24H Estimated by zpool is wrong now. Maybe for a short time

https://i.imgur.com/eqycFqP.jpg
https://i.imgur.com/XzkzeCj.jpg
newbie
Activity: 92
Merit: 0
Hello,
am i the only one having wrong stats regarding hmq1725 and zpool ?
What would be the correct profit factor ? 0.001 ?
newbie
Activity: 107
Merit: 0
Re: Claymore's NeoScrypt AMD GPU Miner v1.2 (Windows)   on: Today at 10:47:56 AM
v1.2:

- improved stratum routines to support more pools.
- added RX550 card support.
Jump to: