I have a proposal - FUNDAMENTAL NODE to be replaced by FUNDAMENTAL GREED due to the fact that FUNDAMENTAL GREED has been running smoothly from the very beginning.
B3 - the evolution of scam !
I am neither a investor nor a supporter of this team. But I would like to point something out.
Who the fuck you are to say this thing. The people dumped their minted coins due to 10000% stake rewards, also the community forced the dev to block rich#1 wallet. The devs had no such intentions.
And about fundamental nodes, why dont you call each and every coin's masternodes as mastergreed. Maybe because they will cut your balls off.
Fundamental Node is an innovative feature, it destroys the funds so as to prevent dumpage of masternode collateral and also for reducing supply, it doesnt forces you to dump your coins or any other shit.
And there is no fucking coinswap. Why dont you fucking understand the unit conversions.
1kg=1000gm
1$=100cents
1k B3 = 1000B3
And about the broken chain, there was nothing wrong with the chain in beginning. The hardcoded seednodes were shutdown by community and thus there were so many forks of chain. The code is clean and tidy. It is mistake of the guy who was supposed to run the seednodes.
The no rewards problem is due to the fact that supporters of this coin are not able to run refrence nodes correctly, thats all.
At last, the dev has tried his best and still trying to make good of community. It is the insane reward system that caused inflation. And also the community forced dev to take some wrong decisions.
I agree with someone else who said ‘forced’ was the wrong word to use, but I agree that the main dev appears to be trying to make this coin succeed and that certain people with big egos appointed to the ‘team’ (I say team loosely) and now gone likely influenced the main dev into making some decisions that should not have been done or even considered until after the high staking period was over.
That’s a new point about the hardcorded seednodes.. never heard that one before.. I can’t grasp why they would have been shut down.
But you see at the end of it all, as an investor, no one really cares who caused what problem, where..because of whom.. its starts looking like a more systematic problem because there are so many issues to solve..
Would a well organized team shutdown critical seednodes or allow that to happen? Would a well organized team allow ‘the community’ to ‘force’ the dev to make such decisions.. Would a well organized team launch their biggest innovation to date (fundamental nodes) without one bit of news about it on their website? I don’t think so.
Can a team learn and improve, yes. I reviewed the ‘deadcoins’ site. I concede, B3 is not there yet.. and those deadcoins really do look like terrible coins. By that marker, this project might have a chance.
Btw this forum is much more objective than the discord chat. Better to leave the clear heads here. Those of us asking questions, being frank and open are do a better service for this coin and investors.