the second factor is a tamper-proof shock collar under moderator control. I'm sure this will increase the adequacy of forum punishments. 
Burn them at the neck
Topic: Ban user Lumen111 - page 2. (Read 493 times)
Burn them at the neck
legendary
Activity: 2436
Merit: 1189
Need Campaign Manager?PM on telegram @sujonali1819
I am not sure exactly why you have got ban. But when I visited your profile find this two post on the first page that are same with each other in different thread without any reference link.
1. https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.48396001
2. https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.48396054
1. https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.48396001
2. https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.48396054
I consider it an inadequate punishment for the mistake made.
well everyone else considers it an adequate punishment.
I suggest we start requiring two-factor authentication to log on, except instead of a token, the second factor is a tamper-proof shock collar under moderator control. I'm sure this will increase the adequacy of forum punishments.
- Massive spamming
When?
- Rampant usage auto translation tools to make fake translations for bounties.
When?I myself do not translate. For bounty, the more.
I hire professional translators to translate texts.
I am sure that's not the reason you were banned as the posts were deleted by mods. Somewhere somehow, you must have posted text without citing a source since you were so notorious with those auto translate tools.
You have been reported to be breaking forum rules quite a handful times
- Massive spamming
- Rampant usage auto translation tools to make fake translations for bounties.
I don't think you will get any chance of getting your ban lifted.
You have been reported to be breaking forum rules quite a handful times
- Massive spamming
- Rampant usage auto translation tools to make fake translations for bounties.
I don't think you will get any chance of getting your ban lifted.
I consider it an inadequate punishment for the mistake made.
well everyone else considers it an adequate punishment.
2. I answered the users on my page. They repeated the question, I replicated the answer.
Who considers the punishment for it adequate?
For a mistake made over a year ago?
I consider it an inadequate punishment for the mistake made.
well everyone else considers it an adequate punishment.
Dear moderator, my account Lumen111 was banned today.
The reason, as I understand it, is to repeat the message.
This is not plagiarism, not spam.
On the bounty page of the company that I led more than a year ago, I repeated my message to users.
Today I was banned for it on the forum forever.
I consider it an inadequate punishment for the mistake made.
And please reconsider your decision.
Jump to: