Pages:
Author

Topic: Bank of Korea's research on crypto and FIAT currency - page 2. (Read 1578 times)

sr. member
Activity: 518
Merit: 251
South Korea’s central bank has published a new working paper analyzing a dual-currency regime by pitting cryptocurrencies against traditional fiat currencies. Fiat currencies have been historically known to decrease continuously, the authors confirm, due to inflation and the factor of new money pumped in to the supply by the central bank, also known as quantitative easing. Bitcoin, in stark contrast, has a fixed supply which would imply a “deflationary bias”, the authors note. However, security or trust issues – the decentralization of digital currency and the absence of insurance provided by governmental authorities – may prevent digital currency from being used as a store of value. Instead, digital currency may be used as a medium of exchange dominantly.

Do you agree with this research result?



@mynhpark ,i think digital exchange will be dominant in the near future. but not now maybe. because not all countries will see these as to what south korea have seen it. but there will always be a room for adaptation. if central banks of the world will really research for this and find something more beneficial from this, then maybe that is the time that digital currency will be dominant.
legendary
Activity: 2940
Merit: 1865
South Korea’s central bank has published a new working paper analyzing a dual-currency regime by pitting cryptocurrencies against traditional fiat currencies. Fiat currencies have been historically known to decrease continuously, the authors confirm, due to inflation and the factor of new money pumped in to the supply by the central bank, also known as quantitative easing. Bitcoin, in stark contrast, has a fixed supply which would imply a “deflationary bias”, the authors note. However, security or trust issues – the decentralization of digital currency and the absence of insurance provided by governmental authorities – may prevent digital currency from being used as a store of value. Instead, digital currency may be used as a medium of exchange dominantly.

Do you agree with this research result?


I think it is the other way around. Cryptos, especially the leading ones like Bitcoin, will function better as a store of value because of their deflationary nature. Right now, because of the volatility it doesn't function as a store of value. But eventually, we will get there.


(Bold highlighting mine)

That's a good observation.  BTC is a bit too volatile to count on as a Store of Value for now.  I agree that we will get there someday though.

*  *  *

My experience and reading would let me believe that South Korea's analysis of BTC prospects is pretty accurate.  S Korea is a very advanced country, and they keep their word, HONOR still means something.  I do business with Korea, their products are excellent quality at good prices.
legendary
Activity: 1246
Merit: 1000
South Korea’s central bank has published a new working paper analyzing a dual-currency regime by pitting cryptocurrencies against traditional fiat currencies. Fiat currencies have been historically known to decrease continuously, the authors confirm, due to inflation and the factor of new money pumped in to the supply by the central bank, also known as quantitative easing. Bitcoin, in stark contrast, has a fixed supply which would imply a “deflationary bias”, the authors note. However, security or trust issues – the decentralization of digital currency and the absence of insurance provided by governmental authorities – may prevent digital currency from being used as a store of value. Instead, digital currency may be used as a medium of exchange dominantly.

Do you agree with this research result?


I think it is the other way around. Cryptos, especially the leading ones like Bitcoin, will function better as a store of value because of their deflationary nature. Right now, because of the volatility it doesn't function as a store of value. But eventually, we will get there.
sr. member
Activity: 406
Merit: 252
Veni, Vidi, Vici
South Korea’s central bank has published a new working paper analyzing a dual-currency regime by pitting cryptocurrencies against traditional fiat currencies. Fiat currencies have been historically known to decrease continuously, the authors confirm, due to inflation and the factor of new money pumped in to the supply by the central bank, also known as quantitative easing. Bitcoin, in stark contrast, has a fixed supply which would imply a “deflationary bias”, the authors note. However, security or trust issues – the decentralization of digital currency and the absence of insurance provided by governmental authorities – may prevent digital currency from being used as a store of value. Instead, digital currency may be used as a medium of exchange dominantly.

Do you agree with this research result?



Would be interesting to give us a link, I believe this paper is written in English, so as to read their conclusions. But if the authors of paper support that flaw of cryptocurrency is decentralization and needs the insurance provided by governments then maybe they are joking or they are paid trolls in the payroll of the bank. As an example what the insurance of the Zimbabwe's government?
sr. member
Activity: 924
Merit: 260
Im with them with their research as they are all right about making Cryptocurrency as a medium of exchange. Also South Korea is mostly a credit card dominant country nobody really needs to convert their money to Korean Won as almost always they accept Credit Card payments even the little shops. Adding Bitcoin into the scene might add another option for us tourist when going there, also it may actually boost the tourism itself. Koreans are actually thinking ahead aside from thinking the negatives of decentralized currency.
Not only you and your country, I am also with them as they try to make crypto currencies as they medium of exchange! Fiat currencies are too expensive, risky and venerable for looters. If any country can adopt crypto currencies as a medium of exchange then the sky will be they limit. However majority of the third world countries will benefit from bitcoin as dollars exchange is want keep them poor.
legendary
Activity: 1596
Merit: 1005
★Nitrogensports.eu★
Bitcoin, in stark contrast, has a fixed supply which would imply a “deflationary bias”, the authors note.
I agree here. People are biased alredy, they don't want to spend coins because of a fear that in the future Bitcoin will be much more valuable.
Bitcoin community is suffering from our own 'Bitcoin Pizza' syndrome.

However, security or trust issues – the decentralization of digital currency and the absence of insurance provided by governmental authorities – may prevent digital currency from being used as a store of value.
Government insurance is not worth anything, banks are lying, quantitative easing is rampantly growing bigger.
Fiat money is good only here and now, tomorrow we can have another global economic crisis.

newbie
Activity: 23
Merit: 0
South Korea’s central bank has published a new working paper analyzing a dual-currency regime by pitting cryptocurrencies against traditional fiat currencies. Fiat currencies have been historically known to decrease continuously, the authors confirm, due to inflation and the factor of new money pumped in to the supply by the central bank, also known as quantitative easing. Bitcoin, in stark contrast, has a fixed supply which would imply a “deflationary bias”, the authors note. However, security or trust issues – the decentralization of digital currency and the absence of insurance provided by governmental authorities – may prevent digital currency from being used as a store of value. Instead, digital currency may be used as a medium of exchange dominantly.

Do you agree with this research result?



These results are pretty much what we already know but it's good that they agree that bitcoin is deflationary because that is something that most of us think is a good thing.
hero member
Activity: 1806
Merit: 672
Im with them with their research as they are all right about making Cryptocurrency as a medium of exchange. Also South Korea is mostly a credit card dominant country nobody really needs to convert their money to Korean Won as almost always they accept Credit Card payments even the little shops. Adding Bitcoin into the scene might add another option for us tourist when going there, also it may actually boost the tourism itself. Koreans are actually thinking ahead aside from thinking the negatives of decentralized currency.
hero member
Activity: 1792
Merit: 534
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
Having a fixed supply just means that the value of the coin is determined by how much people need to hold, and all transactions are just in between two people.

Unfortunately you couldn't actually measure the coin against another currency, because nothing is stable enough to judge the value of it.  If you put it against the US dollar you'll find that it has a 1-2% deflation rate, when in fact it doesn't.

It certainly doesn't have a "deflationary bias" though.  I see that as a misconception.  If you found something with a stable value to compare it against, it would naturally be neutral and its value is only determined by the state of the economy and how much money people put into it.
full member
Activity: 378
Merit: 101
South Korea’s central bank has published a new working paper analyzing a dual-currency regime by pitting cryptocurrencies against traditional fiat currencies. Fiat currencies have been historically known to decrease continuously, the authors confirm, due to inflation and the factor of new money pumped in to the supply by the central bank, also known as quantitative easing. Bitcoin, in stark contrast, has a fixed supply which would imply a “deflationary bias”, the authors note. However, security or trust issues – the decentralization of digital currency and the absence of insurance provided by governmental authorities – may prevent digital currency from being used as a store of value. Instead, digital currency may be used as a medium of exchange dominantly.

Do you agree with this research result?

Pages:
Jump to: