Topic: bASIC - Not accept BTC for pre-orders? - page 2. (Read 2769 times)

Thank you for a reasoned reply. From what I've read, pre-orders can't be cancelled (I may be wrong) and I'm not sure about the 20-40x difficulty increase. Though block reward and halved with no difficulty decrease, so that is pretty much a 2x increase in a matter of days.

If they have the facilities to host & run the ASIC's and staff to keep them running smoothly, then yes, up until people start cancelling their pre-orders because they've been waiting so long. I don't see any 20-40x increase in network difficulty (which is what I would expect to see once ASIC mining starts), so I don't think this is the case.

True, but the question is once they have taken money for pre-orders is it in the manufacturers interst to not deliver the goods for an extended period while mining themselves?

Well, you may notice all the vendors are taking pre-orders. The reason they do this is to get capital for the cost of the design of the chips (approx. $250,000-$500,000). You may also notice that the Bitcoin network difficulty & exchange rate are both very volatile & that new mining technology comes out very often, so there is no guarantee that anyone buying these chips will pay off their investment (they are a very risky investment in fact).

The reason most ASIC vendors sell their chips rather than self-mine, is because of a lack of capital & the fact that selling the ASIC's is a much safer business model than taking all the risks involved in mining.

Its seems people prefer to call "troll" whenever they are too lazy or stupid to make a valid counter-arguement.... or are trying to
 bury an "inconvenient view".

I've made a valid point: why should ASIC vendors sell ASIC's rather than mine with them? The only reply I got was a long-winded
waffle that strung several half-arguements together.

Basic economics states: The only time an ASIC manufacturer would deliver is when the sale value of the ASIC is more
 than the value of the Bitcoins the ASIC can be expected to mine.

@repentance

(psssssst, it's a troll. tempt it into the designated trolling thread, I'm hanging the troll wrangling hat up for now)

Where on earth did I say that?  I would expect that the majority of miners will recover their initial hardware investment but the amount of time that takes will increase as more and more power ASIC power is thrown at the network, so miners will either need to buy additional hardware to mine a given amount of Bitcoins each month or see the amount of Bitcoins they mine each month diminish if they don't invest in more hardware.

By contrast, once their R&D costs have been recovered, those selling the shovels (ASICs) are making a known amount of profit on every unit they sell and making that profit instantly.  If they're half-way competent, they know exactly at what point the market will be saturated and they'll need to drop prices to stimulate further sales, but miners themselves are going to need to go on purchasing additional hardware just to tread water for as long as the overall amount of network power continues to increase.

In a sense, every computing technology which hits the market is already obsolete in that plans are usually already in place for the next generation.  It's not a field in which you rest on your laurels for a few years and then think about designing something new after your product is no longer adequate for its intended purpose.  I seem to recall Josh saying he expects that people will still be able to use their BFL ASICs in 5 years but that doesn't mean an individual ASIC will be bringing in a return which covers its power costs at that point - 5 years is a very long time when it comes to technology.  

Hell, in the 18 months I've been on this forum we've gone from people being able to mine using the CPU on pretty much any computer they already owned to the development of ASICs - it would be foolish to try to predict where Bitcoin mining will be in 18 months time, let alone 5 years, but one thing you can be certain of is that there'll always be a demand for new shovels.

So what you're saying is this: Someone buying an ASIC will pay more than the value of what the ASIC will mine.

Doesn't that sound stupid to you?

The only ASICs that will get to an end user will be, at best, an obsolete generation. The whole ASIC lovefest here
just reeks of scam.

^ This - and be aware that Dave is out of town until Tuesday (I think that's the day?) so his replies will be delayed.

They did accept BTC at one time, as I paid via BTC, though that was with their old site at BTCFPGA. I believe both Tom and Dave have acknowledged intermittent issues with their BTC processor on bitcoinasic.net. Maybe send a PM or email to buzzdave at https://www.btcfpga.com/forum/index.php and see if he can help.

Of course ASICs do exist, there are literally thousands of ASIC manufacturers in the world.

There are only a handful of Bitcoin ASIC manufactureres though, but Bitcoin ASICs are entirely possible & they would definitely  be more efficient than GPU's.

ASICminer are doing exactly what you're saying as well, they're planning on self-mining.

Anyways, I'm not here to argue that, was just curious why they wouldn't accept BTC, especially when all of their competition do.

Without selling them, ASICs designers would not have enough capital to have them manufactured in the first place.
Therefore they must sell pre-orders (or shares in a mining operation), in order to make them.

What a lot of crap.  Just because mining with ASICs may be profitable (given certain conditions) doesn't mean that selling ASICs isn't going to be more profitable.

If you had a golden goose, would you sell it for a few scraps of gold?

ASICs don't make any sense, if they exist and are profitable, no one in their right mind would be selling them.

I don't seem to be able to pay using BTC, the only option is a credit card (which I don't have nor want).

Is there any reason they don't accept BTC?