im curious, why do you think towers is a game of skill and not chance ? since every hand is unique and results dont depend on previous/next hands
Because the tower game is similar to zener cards / card guessing games (which can thus be TRAINED/IMPROVED) different than just pressing buttons on a slot machine and '' hoping lady luck '' would help you.
It's methods used by " thought " training schools.
refer to examples:
1)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_39TDX_r8gY2)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iTgHq9qPGr0Where essentially the object in question is hidden from sight and it takes a good deal of '' guessing '' on the individual (high use of brain)
to make the correct '' prediction '' of which tile/square is the correct answer.
This requires a lot of brain effort, and trained guessing skills.
Certainly, the tower game can be played RANDOMLY like a game of chance, as well.
But a '' trained '' human on guessing skill, can excel easily, on this kinds of games, and thus beat them/lower the house advantage significantly and eventually reach some fat payouts/jackpots this way; provided the game is FAIR and have no cheating mechanisms into play (which most casinos sadly employ as they are not here to lose $$$ despite their bullshit excuses about PROVABLY FAIR system, which is a lie
)
A trained individual would have above average probability of predicting the outcome correctly (with odds of like 1:30 of reoccurring or better, for example)
and this is more than enough to beat the game once or a few times, putting the player in significant profits.
On tower, to reach the top and hit a jackpot, one does not even need to be super skilled on guessing cards/guessing games.
One only need a SMALL DEGREE of advantage/skills (in a '' predictable '' way/repeating basis, not just a random lucky run but on a test of at last 100x or more rounds) in order to be massively profitable and hit one or several jackpots in the proccess...
, their license is under CIL [Curacao Interactive Licensing] 
, as shown on the bottom of their website, on the seal of validation 
