Author

Topic: 🔥🔥🔥 BC.GAME - CASINO AND SPORTSBOOK | $1,000 GIVEAWAY LIVE! 🔥🔥🔥 - page 176. (Read 72984 times)

newbie
Activity: 32
Merit: 0
We believe it is very trust worthy and reliable platform and should be more popular.
Yep.I hope also that they trust worthy.
newbie
Activity: 32
Merit: 0
There's a problem with your provably fair method (you copied the bustabit scheme, without doing the "seeding event" to prove that the hash chain itself is fair). In other words: you are proving the games are predetermined, but you're not proving they're from a fair distribution.  Does this qualify for the 100 ETH bounty?


Dear friend,
Thanks for your attention on BC.Game, and it's our great honor to answer your question.
Not just a replica, in 2017 when we have started to engaging in the blockchain market, BC.Game accidentally discovered Bustabit, similar to our originally-created H5 game in 2015 —train crash, followed by a purchase authorization from Bustabit to hash.game with our strong determination on developing games in crypto world.
About the hash fairness, on the base of long-term argumentation and some discussion with Bustabit team, we run numerous statistical tests on random hash seeds reaching a conclusion that the probability is same with impossible manipulation.
Here is the data:
Fair check
https://bcsnproject.github.io/HashCheck/
800k given data is available on our website:
60% probability of result higher than 2x (theoretically 49.505%), in favor of the player betting higher than 2x.
19.9% probability of result higher than 5x (theoretically 19.8%), in favor of the player betting higher than 5x.
9.97% probability of result higher than 10x (theoretically 9.903%), in favor of the player betting higher than 10x.
1.02% probability of result higher than 100x (theoretically 0.99%), in favor of the player betting higher than 100x.

Meanwhile, we can see that the real probability is higher than the theoretical one. But can we draw a conclusion that higher betting has more advantages? Would that make any difference if these data were distributed to each day.
I don’t think we have any conclusion from the above analysis due to different betting ways from each player. Here are some strategies for sure but we can’t say which one is the best.

Now let’s discuss this from a continuity perspective. (1*2 bet)
The number of 6 consecutive occurrences of result which doubles the previous one is 13485 (higher than theoretical one 13261), not in favor for those who stopped their betting at the sixth time.
The number of 7 consecutive occurrences of result which doubles the previous one is 6626(lower than theoretical one 6696), in favor for those who continue their betting at the seventh time.
The number of 8 consecutive occurrences of result which doubles the previous one is 3272(lower than theoretical one 3381), in favor for those who continue their betting at the eighth time.

So, does this help us reach a conclusion? While some strategies are good, some are not. We don’t believe that there is any best seed choice to affect the result. Maybe you want to say that increasing the probability of the result lower than 2x on purpose by the website is to earn more. But this is not guaranteed in some strategies. Even with huge amount of data analysis, you will find that the result lower that 2x is not in high percentage, even less than 0.5%. Greater data provides a result closer to the theoretical. In addition, 10-million data need 10 years to run out. There is no assurance at all when the data distributed each day, week, month and year.
To sum up, no matter which hash seed you are using, it’s a fair game on the grounds that we never know what strategy the player will choose. We prefer to invite more players to come with the better combination way of betting. That’s our goal and advantage.

We also welcome more specific analysis with data and algorithm worth 100ETH. You can run any test on GitHub. But opinion in one sentence is not enough.
https://github.com/BCSNProject/CheckCondition

The only advantage of seed choice is easier understanding for beginners; there is no effect on the fairness of the game. We are trying to use EOS+BTC seeds choices recently for players to make the seeds of this game more decentralized.

Thanks for your big reply.
jr. member
Activity: 87
Merit: 2




_______________________________________________________________________________  

                       
 


_______________________________________________________________________________  



ABOUT BC.GAME :


Based on the Ethereum smart contract, BC.Game guaranteed provable fairness on the grounds of traceable transaction and impossible manipulation







                       
 


_______________________________________________________________________________  

Very good platform ever among other spaces in the market. We can say that for sure.Best of luck
jr. member
Activity: 112
Merit: 1
How do BC maintain transparency in their system?
newbie
Activity: 29
Merit: 0
We believe it is very trust worthy and reliable platform and should be more popular.
legendary
Activity: 3150
Merit: 1392
Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!
You have a great bonus system with refular rewards for various kinds of players. You are also saying that you developed the bustabit-like game on your own. Congrats if you did, 'cause it's one of my favorites. Since your website is new, I think a small faucet to attract new players wouldn't hurt. Well, to be honest, maybe you already have it, but something went wrong... Once I registered, I received a notification about a successful 8888 JB deposit (don't know what that is). I also managed to place a bet, but when I pushed "crash out" around 1.8, it wrote "cannot_escape" in a small button-like field. I wonder what that meant and whether a user is supposed to see these things... Oh, and it took 1 JB I used for a bet away, as if I lost it, even though I pushed the button before the chart 'banged'..
newbie
Activity: 14
Merit: 0
How do you ensure meaning traceable transaction?
jr. member
Activity: 75
Merit: 1
It is good news for crypto players and also a very impressive concept for providing utmost fairness as well.
hero member
Activity: 2842
Merit: 625
So who are you here? At your first post, you said like that you are a player on this new site but in this post you are saying "our" which means that you are a part of BC Game. Can you clarify it?
It's pretty obvious that they are using another account to bump their thread just look at the recent newbies that are asking questions yesterday.

Thats $14,000 as of this writing but that kind of bounty reward is way too big. Are you serious? lol
I think it will be divided to the people that will see those holes on their casino. Isn't it exciting to see on who are those people that will be rewarded with their promised bounty?
copper member
Activity: 240
Merit: 125
There's a problem with your provably fair method (you copied the bustabit scheme, without doing the "seeding event" to prove that the hash chain itself is fair). In other words: you are proving the games are predetermined, but you're not proving they're from a fair distribution.  Does this qualify for the 100 ETH bounty?


Dear friend,
Thanks for your attention on BC.Game, and it's our great honor to answer your question.
Not just a replica, in 2017 when we have started to engaging in the blockchain market, BC.Game accidentally discovered Bustabit, similar to our originally-created H5 game in 2015 —train crash, followed by a purchase authorization from Bustabit to hash.game with our strong determination on developing games in crypto world.
About the hash fairness, on the base of long-term argumentation and some discussion with Bustabit team, we run numerous statistical tests on random hash seeds reaching a conclusion that the probability is same with impossible manipulation.
Here is the data:
Fair check
https://bcsnproject.github.io/HashCheck/
800k given data is available on our website:
60% probability of result higher than 2x (theoretically 49.505%), in favor of the player betting higher than 2x.
19.9% probability of result higher than 5x (theoretically 19.8%), in favor of the player betting higher than 5x.
9.97% probability of result higher than 10x (theoretically 9.903%), in favor of the player betting higher than 10x.
1.02% probability of result higher than 100x (theoretically 0.99%), in favor of the player betting higher than 100x.

Meanwhile, we can see that the real probability is higher than the theoretical one. But can we draw a conclusion that higher betting has more advantages? Would that make any difference if these data were distributed to each day.
I don’t think we have any conclusion from the above analysis due to different betting ways from each player. Here are some strategies for sure but we can’t say which one is the best.

Now let’s discuss this from a continuity perspective. (1*2 bet)
The number of 6 consecutive occurrences of result which doubles the previous one is 13485 (higher than theoretical one 13261), not in favor for those who stopped their betting at the sixth time.
The number of 7 consecutive occurrences of result which doubles the previous one is 6626(lower than theoretical one 6696), in favor for those who continue their betting at the seventh time.
The number of 8 consecutive occurrences of result which doubles the previous one is 3272(lower than theoretical one 3381), in favor for those who continue their betting at the eighth time.

So, does this help us reach a conclusion? While some strategies are good, some are not. We don’t believe that there is any best seed choice to affect the result. Maybe you want to say that increasing the probability of the result lower than 2x on purpose by the website is to earn more. But this is not guaranteed in some strategies. Even with huge amount of data analysis, you will find that the result lower that 2x is not in high percentage, even less than 0.5%. Greater data provides a result closer to the theoretical. In addition, 10-million data need 10 years to run out. There is no assurance at all when the data distributed each day, week, month and year.
To sum up, no matter which hash seed you are using, it’s a fair game on the grounds that we never know what strategy the player will choose. We prefer to invite more players to come with the better combination way of betting. That’s our goal and advantage.


The only advantage of seed choice is easier understanding for beginners; there is no effect on the fairness of the game. We are trying to use EOS+BTC seeds choices recently for players to make the seeds of this game more decentralized.
newbie
Activity: 32
Merit: 0
jr. member
Activity: 103
Merit: 2
It is so awesome that they ensure of zero manipulation from official organizer. It is undoubtedly so great.
jr. member
Activity: 64
Merit: 1
Can I use BC.Game on mobile?
jr. member
Activity: 36
Merit: 2
It is a potential concept that is backbone of the crypto games and really very impressive.
jr. member
Activity: 83
Merit: 2
How do you prevent any kind of unfair activity in online gaming spaces?
member
Activity: 126
Merit: 22
There's a problem with your provably fair method (you copied the bustabit scheme, without doing the "seeding event" to prove that the hash chain itself is fair). In other words: you are proving the games are predetermined, but you're not proving they're from a fair distribution.  Does this qualify for the 100 ETH bounty?
Yes, it is obvious that manipulation is possible. So, it's qualify. Congratulations)
legendary
Activity: 1463
Merit: 1886
There's a problem with your provably fair method (you copied the bustabit scheme, without doing the "seeding event" to prove that the hash chain itself is fair). In other words: you are proving the games are predetermined, but you're not proving they're from a fair distribution.  Does this qualify for the 100 ETH bounty?
legendary
Activity: 3094
Merit: 1127
We are not saying we will give 100ETH for any player. It's just a way to prove our crash game is fair. If you dont think our site is trusted and be able to prove manipulation. We will pay 100ETH.
Thats $14,000 as of this writing but that kind of bounty reward is way too big. Are you serious? lol

The good thing i do see on this crash game is that it do have multiple crypto to bet from and some rain chat as far as i observed but why i do see most of characters are on Chinese? 
copper member
Activity: 240
Merit: 125
We are not saying we will give 100ETH for any player. It's just a way to prove our crash game is fair. If you dont think our site is trusted and be able to prove manipulation. We will pay 100ETH.
legendary
Activity: 3500
Merit: 1354
How can we participate on any site like this which is giving 100 bonus eth? I just checked the site and yet I do not see anything like 100 eth that is given for the players as well. And I just saw many coins there but mostly eth players. I saw pretty much players there but I do not see any big whale like other crash site has though. Are you saying that you guys only provide things that small players needed?

Are you referring to the 100 eth reward for unfair found? I think it is like a bug report, if you think that you find a significant bug then they will reward you with 100ETH. Indeed it is a huge amount for bug report as well especially they are a new site. I do not even think big trusted site will offer such big bug bounty.
Jump to: