Topic: 🔥🔥🔥 BC.GAME - CASINO AND SPORTSBOOK | $1,000 GIVEAWAY LIVE! 🔥🔥🔥 - page 78. (Read 73155 times)

Well, some guys who stream their playing are sponsored (at least there is a big chance for that), but there are anonymous high-rollers as well. But sponsored or not it's crazy to watch high rollers playing, from a gambler's perspective I think we would all love to be there... playing with crazy high stakes and experiencing the excitement that comes from that.

I don't they are sponsored in anyway because you would be surprised to what and how much people really stake on gambling especially the crash games, well I don't know about the certainty but I just think it's real account that do play these games and I think bc.game is big enough to house these type of gamblers as their customers and I have others stake like and huge winnings too but the difference is that the I.D to the coupon are provided for people to get full details on the staked games but that's for soccer and other sportbets.

Do you mean that the people who bet big on bc.game's house edge games are people sponsored by the casino?

At first I never thought about it like that, but after reading your post maybe it could happen. Moreover, seeing the game crash, quite a lot of users bet more than $1000 on the game crash. that's so crazy to me, do you think it's also sponsored by the casino?

Yes, you're right it's somehow crazy to see that some people place bets of $10 to $50 dollars on Plinko because the game is quite risky and is highly a luck dependent game so chance of losing is way more than winning. The game can cause huge losses to such gamblers but when luck is in favor then they possibly get some good multipliers.

I don't know much about those sponsored people but I think I have seen some social media guys to win huge jackpots and you may be right about those. I would say that someone should first check his/her bankroll and then place bets because if you can't afford to lose the money that you're betting then you should not place a bet at first place. I would say one should only bet with the money that he/she can afford to lose.they

It’s true that hitting 1000x would be a gamer changer for some people but putting $10 - $50 in a single game in plinko is crazy!

I have seen people do that and what comes to my mind is that - they may be super rich to be able to do that, I can’t imagine someone with just a $1000 bankroll staking $50 on plinko before he even blinks his money would be gone.  Majority of people you see staking high and hitting 1000x on social media are being sponsored and it would not be a wise decision to increase the amount you stake just because you saw someone who won a huge multiplier after staking big.

I can relate to this because the amount I see gambler play with gives me the chills especially in the BC.game crash aviator games. At some point I had to compare the ratings I see with other casino crash game because the amount used in staking by the gambler is shown below and when i finished comparing I come to know how big BC.game casino is way bigger and I think it's because of the steady and stable interface of the crash game display which makes it very easy to actually cash out your funds even at the very little time of odds of 1.30. I think the secret they use is to bet big and cash out very fast to reduce the risk of losing all the funds.

Yes, and I once saw someone win over $50k on plinko bc.game. The bc.game house edge game has whale class gamblers. You can see in the game crash that they bet up to 1 or 2 eth. That's a crazy amount in my opinion, I don't know how much balance they have but it's a number that is beyond reason for me.

I usually only bet a few cents on plinko so I can have lots of balls to roll. If I'm lucky then I can get 130x once or twice, that's enough for me. I never got 1000x but I once got 130x three times in one session, that was a good win for me

Yes, we thought that and you're right there are bunch of phishing sites that we see and every here and there a new phishing site pops up that's targeted to scam the users and get their credentials. But, now thankfully we are sure that it's mirror of the BC.GAME and everything is okay for us now.

Man, you're right a gambler would earn a lot if he gets 1000x multiplier with $10 or $50 bets. But, it's not easy to get such multiplier if he/she isn't extremely lucky. 1000x of $10 will be $10k which is quite good amount for many people not only for those who are living in third world countries but also for those who are living in first world countries. And, that of $50 would be $50k which is a lot of money for anyone from anywhere I guess. in the end only someone who's very lucky will get such multipliers.

Yeah, very much agree with you, 1000x is alot of multiplier, as that implies that the gambler will be doubling his or her money by 1000 times, and if for example, the gambler has a base bet of like $10 to $50 dollars, and ended up hitting the 1000x, thats a lot of money for the gambler, and one that could be life changing depending on the country the gambler is playing from.

And you are right about plinko as well, plinko is one of the in-house casino games I also love to play, and most of the time, if I have enough balance in my bankroll, I love to put the game in an autoplay mode, as I love to watch the red tiny balls roll down in their multiple numbers.
If it's one's lucky day, he or she could turn the tiniest of bankroll into a bankroll of thousands of dollars, like a video I watched online, the guys started playing plinko with a bankroll of $200, he used the autoplay mode and set $1 as base bet, he set 50 rounds.
By the time the auto play was done with the 50 rounds, his bankroll had increased and sitting at around $2150 (including the initial $150 balance he had after playing the game with $50).

Don't forget also the BC. Game who have this game event and also looking forward for your participation in the future.

You don't need to worry because you have enough time to make a prediction with this upcoming match

---

Update: Four (4) days to go before the game starts, its an awaiting match between the Top 2 and Top 10 teams in the current games.

Congratulations komisariatku, I've missed this one and will join the next one.

I've tried going on with that high multiplier but I don't think that I'll ever hit that. And that's why setting it like that multiplier as yours and going down to 10x-15x is likely my confidence set. And it's totally fun to play when you don't have that much thing to do.

I agree, we have thought that it's not really from them as there's a bunch of phishing copying the real one and its mirror sites. And in that case, I am wrong and xlays is right. 

Yes bro, getting a 1000x multiplier is very difficult, the record for the highest multiplier I ever got was only 130x. I have a friend who really likes playing crash and plinko on bc.game. He says he almost gets a 1000x multiplier on bc.game at least once a month. I don't know if it's true or not but he once sent me a 1000x win on Plinko. btw, that's a friend I met in the bc.game chatbox. We are quite close and often we share small tip when we win.

If you don't like it then there's no need to try, sometimes playing plinko is fun if we get a good multiplier, besides that I don't need to think much to play it, just click "bet" like slot machine. However this game is only about luck, there are no tricks in it, so when the casino doesn't give us enough luck it usually ends badly.

A 1000x multiplier is indeed very difficult to win:


Source

This is not necessarily 100% true for BC.Game, as the probability depends heavily on how many lines there are in the Plinko game. But the graphic shows quite clearly how unlikely such a high win is.
However, a 26x is also not without and definitely a great result!

I hardly ever play Plinko or similar games myself, I just don't have the luck - or the stamina - to play the game more often.

Thanks @icopress, I have received a prize from bc.game contest

 

I tried playing plinko on hard mode in hopes of getting 1000x. It turns out that getting a 1000x multiplier is very difficult, but several of my friends gotten it. I only got 26x multiplier, which is pretty good and I got a small win. The house edge bc.game game is very popular especially the crash game, I see there are more than 1000 players playing it, that's a crazy number

Thanks @Peanutswar and @icopress

This is the result of consistency, I made minute 17 a lucky minute, I answered consistently twice in minute 17. Maybe it's time to look for another lucky minute.

Congrats to our winner komisariatku, Rasmus got the first goal at 17' with the help of Harry Maguire's short pass.

---

We're back again with an upcoming match of

BC.Game First Goal Prediction!

🔥 BC.Game | Man City - Chelsea ⚽ 17 February (WIN $50)

➥You will predict the first-minute goal and chance to WIN $50!

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/bcgame-man-city-chelsea-17-february-win-50-5484822

Cast your predictions now!

Now, it's confirmed that it's a mirror site of them then we should not worry much about it. They should update the list of the mirror sites so others won't get confused about it.

When someone's credentials work on both sites then that's a confirm thing that it's their mirror site. I'm sure if @Cantsay try the credentials then they will work on both sites because that one is just a mirror of the official site as confirmed by you after contacting their support.

Few more hours left, good luck to all participants!

---

Quick preview of the match:  Aston Villa vs Man United
Man United has a standing of 4 wins - 1 draw - 1 lose
Man United vs Nottingham Forest - Domínguez get the first goal at 64' but Rashford tries to draw the game still NF manages to hit another goal with Gibbs-White and close the game with 1:2
Man United vs Wigan - Dalot with an assist from Rashford got the first goal at 22'
Man United vs Tottenham - A draw match between these teams but Rasmus Højlund got the first goal as fast as 3'
Man United vs Newport - They make a back-to-back goal, the first goal was by Bruno Fernandes at 7' and the second goal was by Kobbie Mainoo at 13'
Man United vs Wolves - With the help of Højlund, Marcus Rashford got the first goal 5'
Man United vs West Ham - Højlund got the first goal at 23'

Aston Villa has a standing of 2 wins - 2 draw - 2 lose
Aston Villa vs Middlesbrough - Takes HT before they get the first goal by Matty Cash at 88'
Aston Villa vs Everton - Draw match with a score of 0:0
Aston Villa vs Chelsea - Draw match with a score of 0:0
Aston Villa vs Newcastle - They lose against Newcastle by the early goal of Schär at 32' and 36'
Aston Villa vs Sheff Utd - Aston played so aggressively they closed the game 5:0 and John McGinn got the first goal within 12'
Aston Villa vs Chelsea - After their match earlier in Chelsea this is the real deal, Gallagher makes a move and goal at 11' and closes the game with a 1:3 score

In other words, your credentials worked on both sites without any problem?

I contacted live support, and they side that it's one of the mirror sites. I think they forgot to update the list of mirror sites. There could be more.

Thanks for all the responses guys, but still having the same error on google chrome even when clearing all my cache. Tried it on edge and there it works.
Strange that it doesn't work on chrome as that is my number 1 browser and I don't have issues with any other site, but ok. Just participated in the prizepool for the superbowl also, go Chiefs!