Two posters above me ^^ Thank you for stating the obvious. It seems like CoinHumper's account got hacked and BitcoinExpress is now also known as CoinHumper.
Just look at how many posts about SC2 this goon started and how before getting hacked he was a totally different person.
We are not idiots BCX. Come out in the open please.
Topic: BCX Statement (confirmed) - page 2. (Read 4181 times)
DoubleC just took a cheap shot at BCX in another thread. But he forgets that just the threat of BCX hitting Namecoin sent him scurrying like a rabbit along with Ruxum. There was statement in big red letters for almost two weeks that BCX was the reason he closed his NMC exchange.
It was a shot at you, not at BCX. You're the one that listed those claims, not BCX. Unless you're BCX of course.
DoubleC just took a cheap shot at BCX in another thread. But he forgets that just the threat of BCX hitting Namecoin sent him scurrying like a rabbit along with Ruxum. There was statement in big red letters for almost two weeks that BCX was the reason he closed his NMC exchange.
It was a shot at you, not at BCX. You're the one that listed those claims, not BCX. Unless you're BCX of course. Me thinks that BitcoinEXpress is like Agent Smith in the Matrix, he is getting stronger and will soon exceed the control of the machine.
DoubleC just took a cheap shot at BCX in another thread. But he forgets that just the threat of BCX hitting Namecoin sent him scurrying like a rabbit along with Ruxum. There was statement in big red letters for almost two weeks that BCX was the reason he closed his NMC exchange.
Actions speak louder than words.
DoubleC just took a cheap shot at BCX in another thread. But he forgets that just the threat of BCX hitting Namecoin sent him scurrying like a rabbit along with Ruxum. There was statement in big red letters for almost two weeks that BCX was the reason he closed his NMC exchange.
Actions speak louder than words.
Conspiracy much ? I think Litecoin will be his next victim. Just wait and see.
Small update:
I've been noting the difficulty changes every so often. All (the ones I noted) were within +12-13% increases, which is I believe the max increase per adjustment.
The most recent increase is 8%, which signals that indeed the network is leveling out. Whether or not this is due to BCX pulling out is unknown, but the predictions are on course.
I've been noting the difficulty changes every so often. All (the ones I noted) were within +12-13% increases, which is I believe the max increase per adjustment.
The most recent increase is 8%, which signals that indeed the network is leveling out. Whether or not this is due to BCX pulling out is unknown, but the predictions are on course.
^ Thanks
Either way though, the next couple days will certainly be entertaining
Either way though, the next couple days will certainly be entertaining
Ladies and Gentlemen behold another incarnation of an SC KoolAid drinker....
BCX never said CH confiscated anything other than the attempted consolidation.
Releasing the code solves all of this.
Reading comprehension fail ftw
Honestly some of you can't look at both sides in your rabid fervor of trouncing the other side.
Again, i think there both full of shit.
I don't mine SC and won't install any closed source nonsense either. That said I don't really believe BCX either.
Trusted Nodes My Ass
The trusted nodes are controllers and gateways in addition to being profit generators for CH! When I started consolidating some of the wallets a strange phenomena occurred. After about 25 or so wallets sending to the primary address the transactions slowed down to about 20 minutes each, I suspect manual approval. A while latter the address received none of the transactions it was sent from other wallets. Furthermore the sending wallets could no longer send. Let me clarify, they sent but the funds were never recieved more than likely going to CPF.
Repeated the same thing with 30 more new wallets and a primary address.
I suspect Coinhunter contacted his huge miners and verified it wasn't them and logically concluded the only other HUGE miner out there is me. Coinhunter has the ability to regulate the transfer, track it and kill individual users and transactions at will.
Am I the only one who after reading this thought - ok so the proof he could easily show, ie... the 8 bazillion SC coins he generated has now been conveniently confiscated by Coinhunter. And why would you repeat the same thing 30 separate times after the first transaction if you suspected that
I guess like johnj says we'll see in 12 hours or so.
Personally I think CH and BCX are both full of shit
This type of activity is very Paypal like. All he would have to say is he suspected "Fraudulent" activity.
Well, a charge back would mean that BCX would eventually get the coins back, since he was both the sender and receiver. If CH decides to never release the coins to either party...
Quote
The trusted nodes are controllers and gateways in addition to being profit generators for CH! When I started consolidating some of the wallets a strange phenomena occurred. After about 25 or so wallets sending to the primary address the transactions slowed down to about 20 minutes each, I suspect manual approval. A while latter the address received none of the transactions it was sent from other wallets. Furthermore the sending wallets could no longer send. Let me clarify, they sent but the funds were never recieved more than likely going to CPF.
Question: Is this theft? Regardless of where the coins end up (CPF, destroyed, etc), CH&Co taking other peoples coins at will... sounds like theft. I'll be the first to admit though many of the technical details are over my head, but when someone takes/destroys something that doesn't belong to them... i'm not sure what else to call that. Especially when (allegedly) the coins were mined legitimately in the first place.
Of course, this is contingent on being verified in the first place.
I think he needs to be let back in. If he has cracked sc2 then it doesnt deserve to stand.
The idea of someone remotely killing things sounds like sony.
The idea of someone remotely killing things sounds like sony.
DoubleC can you verify?
Yes, I received emails from BitcoinExpress from a gmail address with the name "Justin Guss" in the past.
17375 difficulty 
No blocks for me Damn BCX and all his crap. Bet he is the one who DDOS the btcguild and deepbit pools and as soon as he can, he will steal all BTC coins too in a 51% as price falls lower and lower and miners drop out etc. Bad news.
No blocks for me Damn BCX and all his crap. Bet he is the one who DDOS the btcguild and deepbit pools and as soon as he can, he will steal all BTC coins too in a 51% as price falls lower and lower and miners drop out etc. Bad news. How the hell does one go about "disassembling" a binary to get the source code? As far as I know that's impossible.
Then I suggest you google for "disassembler." It is very much possible, especially if you know what compiler was used to generate the code (most likely gcc on linux and of only a few likely versions). The reverse engineered code, like all machine generated code, is absolutely awful. But once you start "cleaning it up" and re-writing it to be more readable you can get to a good enough state to figure out algorithms. Well, ok, maybe not you or me -- but people with the skills and practice to do this demonstrably exist. Even for code run through an obfuscator.
This, by the way, is how many games get "cracked." Binaries get analyzed, decompiled and poked at until the security mechanism is well understood. It is then replaced.
How the hell does one go about "disassembling" a binary to get the source code? As far as I know that's impossible.
Actually, the SC2 source code decompiles pretty well with REC Studio.
I don't beleive it until some verification, weather from an unbanned BCX, DoubelC, or if the SC network freezes.
Sure will be interesting to see how this pans out. Indeed, a 16000 difficulty on a CPU chain is quite high.
Guess that makes my previous poll more relevant
Sure will be interesting to see how this pans out. Indeed, a 16000 difficulty on a CPU chain is quite high.
Guess that makes my previous poll more relevant
Just unban the guy. He will be back anyways. Makes life easier for all of us. Better to hear it from the horse's mouth rather than from some obscure account claiming to be the real BCX etc.
Thank you !
Thank you !
If DoubleC confirms it, it's not a supposed account is it?
I don't trust him. Let the original account back. Hate dealing with all this sock puppet accounts.
Just unban the guy. He will be back anyways. Makes life easier for all of us. Better to hear it from the horse's mouth rather than from some obscure account claiming to be the real BCX etc.
Thank you !
Thank you !
The trusted nodes are controllers and gateways in addition to being profit generators for CH! When I started consolidating some of the wallets a strange phenomena occurred. After about 25 or so wallets sending to the primary address the transactions slowed down to about 20 minutes each, I suspect manual approval. A while latter the address received none of the transactions it was sent from other wallets. Furthermore the sending wallets could no longer send. Let me clarify, they sent but the funds were never recieved more than likely going to CPF.
If this is true, that is really scary.
Jump to: