Pages:
Author

Topic: "Behind closed doors, EU officials talk about banning Bitcoin" - page 2. (Read 307 times)

legendary
Activity: 2352
Merit: 6089
bitcoindata.science
You know the drill — waste of energy etc etc nothing new.


Going over the pdf which is the net source for the quote, there are a couple more highlighting:
Quote
<…> Which service does Bitcoin offer that Solana1 does not offer to society? <…>

I believe all this can be summarized  as "let's make people use some altcoin we can control, such a Solana which uses pos"

Conveniently,  the "green" alternative to pow is something nations can control much easier, pos.

It is easier just to buy coins or coerce the biggest holders (I.e validators) then having to buy hardwares, expend a he'll lot of electricity, etc.
hero member
Activity: 1778
Merit: 722
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
This can happen or not but news like this one brings nothing than fear to the market, I leave by having this huge amount of investors and users in Europe also considering the growing number of the bitcoin ATMs, that's really not going to be happening at least not now with the current situation, or they maybe want to suspend any cryptocurrency and bitcoin trades other than the trades with KYC with is legalized by them, because I don't expect to see Europe suspending cryptocurrency completely.
legendary
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1159
I dont know , but first thing governments do to make their point is to say that crypto is used for illegal activities. I dont know how much of this is true, But yes I don't want, bad publicity for bitcoin, so there is a need of some sort of government free control, an international collaboration for managing free and fair bitcoin arena. Which allows bitcoin trade, but no illegitimate usage. Lets see what comes up 
legendary
Activity: 2338
Merit: 10802
There are lies, damned lies and statistics. MTwain
The quote seems to be from a meeting with the Swedish financial supervisor and environmental agency back in november 2021, and probably formed part of the preliminary discussions concerning whether to ban PoW in the EU, which last month morphed in the EU into a debate on the appropriate taxonomy for PoW coins, and the implications it may still have at some point. With a bit of luck, the debate is past that, although it goes to show how some brilliant minds work.

Going over the pdf which is the net source for the quote, there are a couple more highlighting:
Quote
<…> Which service does Bitcoin offer that Solana1 does not offer to society? <…>

Quote
Comes to this from a consumer perspective. How would disappearance of bitcoin affect consumers? Participants in BTC are fully aware of the volatility of the currency/investment risk. Do not need additional protection measures.
So, since we are aware that it is volatile, we can easily digest BTC being banned …

Note: It would be interesting to know what the redacted paragraphs pointed to too.
legendary
Activity: 3234
Merit: 5637
Blackjack.fun-Free Raffle-Join&Win $50🎲
It is hard to believe what European bureaucrats are doing at a time when we are threatened not only by inflation but also by hyperinflation, and when in the 21st century wars of conquest and aggression are being waged in Europe. Together with the banking lobby, they are trying to prove that Bitcoin is responsible for climate change that has been going on for at least 100 years.

To make matters even more tragic, they admit that crypto mining in the EU is not even a problem because it is practically only in traces, but will ban Bitcoin because they want to be globally aware and help hungry children in Africa or polar bears at the North Pole.

Quote
European regulators have two tools at their disposal to curb Bitcoin’s hunger for electricity. One is to ban EU-wide mining of cryptocurrencies that use proof-of-work. However, the effect would be limited: Since hardly any mining happens in EU countries, this would have „almost no direct effect on the global mining industry – and thus the energy consumption“ of Bitcoin, says Michel Rauchs, who is a researcher at Cambridge University.

This is just another proof that the world is run mostly by idiots (with rare exceptions) who do not understand why Bitcoin uses POW, and praise some other projects that are of course centralized and use POS. If there is truth in this, then the EU will become more and more like China, which has done exactly what they want now.
legendary
Activity: 2044
Merit: 1018
Not your keys, not your coins!
Fud or attempt to prevent people exposure or access to Bitcoin. How many times such things happened? Have governments ever succeeded with their bans, restrictions? They failed in reality and now any people believe that governments, EU will succeed this time?

In crypto market, Bitcoin recovered so strong and today it has been moving above $42,000. Will it continue the rise to $50,000? Will this ban be a booster for Bitcoin to break $69,000?

Read informative articles to break down Bitcoin Fuds with https://endthefud.org/
mk4
legendary
Activity: 2870
Merit: 3873
Paldo.io 🤖
You know the drill — waste of energy etc etc nothing new. Just thought I'd post this here because of this specific quote:

Quote
"If Ethereum is able to shift, we could legitimately request the same from BTC. We need to “protect” other crypto coins that are sustainable. Don’t see need to “protect” the bitcoin community."

Just something to laugh at.

Source: https://netzpolitik.org/2022/climate-measures-behind-closed-doors-eu-officials-talk-about-banning-bitcoin/
Pages:
Jump to: