Topic: Best Campaign Manager in BCT Forum - page 3. (Read 2442 times)
I choose gianluca95, he is fast respose and he has experience about managing signature campaign. For example on this thread https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/banned-mixer-signature-campaign-earn-up-to-0035-btcweek-full-1441572
Not sure how many of the voters will actually have run a campaign or planning to run one in the future. Most votes probably are going to come from participants rather than runners.
As managers we act like kind of middlemans between the both sides, and there certainly are some that are more popular with enrolled users,
and some that are more beloved by the runners.
I don't take myself out to say which way is the better one, but I'm expecting to see the votes being on favor of the first group over the latter,
or at least one or two managers I would place in said.
On a side not, there's a lot of manager discussion going on right now (or am I just thinking there is?). Not talking about the "list your favorite campaign" spam threads, but rather decent discussion.
As managers we act like kind of middlemans between the both sides, and there certainly are some that are more popular with enrolled users,
and some that are more beloved by the runners.
I don't take myself out to say which way is the better one, but I'm expecting to see the votes being on favor of the first group over the latter,
or at least one or two managers I would place in said.
On a side not, there's a lot of manager discussion going on right now (or am I just thinking there is?). Not talking about the "list your favorite campaign" spam threads, but rather decent discussion.
This is why I like you Sir Lutpin and voted too in this poll, You're a gifted and understanding person, I'm one of your fans here in the forum. Hoping that someday you'll accept my application on your campaign
HAHAHAHA
I voted for Guitarplinker. He does his job quietly and does a really good job in checking the quality posts of the signature he is running. If you look at the spreadsheet he is very strict and some person have even more than 30 disqualified posts there which makes this manager great at managing users and posts quality. He also pays always and on time every time.
It would be more accurate if you would have had check boxes instead of radio buttons.
I think that many (me included) would have liked to vote for more than only one name.
I think that many (me included) would have liked to vote for more than only one name.
Voted for yahoo62278
I remember the time when one of the campaigns he is handling suddenly did not respond about the payment but he made sure that everyone got paid. I think the money came from his pocket not 100% sure of that. The funds was escrowed to master-p and we all know what happened to master-p. I think it was obits or ore-mine campaign. My highest respect to this guy.
I remember the time when one of the campaigns he is handling suddenly did not respond about the payment but he made sure that everyone got paid. I think the money came from his pocket not 100% sure of that. The funds was escrowed to master-p and we all know what happened to master-p. I think it was obits or ore-mine campaign. My highest respect to this guy.
Well i Choose for Yahoo on the best I've following signature and bounty event with manage by Yahoo. Yahoo have too fast work and i like that , with do all with right time.
I've following signature and bounty event with manage by Yahoo. Yahoo have too fast work and i like that , with do all with right time.
Every one of the managers does a really great job in running their campaign so I don't think someone is better than the others. I think some of them have higher requirements like having high quality posts. That is a good thing to ask if you are paying a really good pay per post but when such thing is required from campaigns with really low pay per post I don't agree to such thing. I haven't vote for anyone as they are all good, the user just have to find the campaign manager that fits his writing style.
I'm afraid that my vote is not fair since i haven't worked with all the people from this list,but as far as i know they are all doing a very good job and whoever of them is picked as a manager will run any campaign with great success,I'm curious to to see the final results,hopefully not many newbies/shills/trolls will vote.
newbie can't vote, don't worry about that. i'm doubt too if people will trolling on this vote since this vote doesn't give any benefit for them. 
I'm afraid that my vote is not fair since i haven't worked with all the people from this list,but as far as i know they are all doing a very good job and whoever of them is picked as a manager will run any campaign with great success,I'm curious to to see the final results,hopefully not many newbies/shills/trolls will vote.
I will put my vote in now. 
Is this an anonymous one or will it reveal who you voted for?
@op, its very hard to choose between those managers because all of them do their work with no issues. you should put one more option in the poll- "vote for all the managers".Is this an anonymous one or will it reveal who you voted for?
I can't do that because the main purpose of this Poll is to get the proper rankings of campaign managers. But don't worry they are all best manager as clearly stated in title of , just need the results of the poll. I made the result of votes hidden until the poll ended to have a suspense.
I will put my vote in now.
Is this an anonymous one or will it reveal who you voted for?
you will remain anonymous. so you dont have to worry about whom you have voted for. btw, this is the reason why bitcointalk's poll system is a bit unfair because many people with their numerous alts vote for the same thing and we dont come to know who voted for whom.Is this an anonymous one or will it reveal who you voted for?
@op, its very hard to choose between those managers because all of them do their work with no issues. you should put one more option in the poll- "vote for all the managers".
I can say that Yahoo62278 already did a great job maintain the campaign.
ANyway I'm wondering , let say if he's work on the real life and still able to maintain the multiple campaign , for me it's very exhausting.
But for money , people will do anything
ANyway I'm wondering , let say if he's work on the real life and still able to maintain the multiple campaign , for me it's very exhausting.
But for money , people will do anything
I vote for yahoo also, although i haven't joint his campaign, but his rules are best. Luptin is too strict to accept new guys in 777 and bitvest.
I don't know about this vote will really useful at this time, if I see this thread just like the war quality of participant.
I will put my vote in now.
Is this an anonymous one or will it reveal who you voted for?
The one I picked has been around for a long time so his experience shows this in his abilities in the way he picks the right candidates for the campaign(s) he manages.
Is this an anonymous one or will it reveal who you voted for?
The one I picked has been around for a long time so his experience shows this in his abilities in the way he picks the right candidates for the campaign(s) he manages.
Not sure how many of the voters will actually have run a campaign or planning to run one in the future. Most votes probably are going to come from participants rather than runners.
As managers we act like kind of middlemans between the both sides, and there certainly are some that are more popular with enrolled users,
and some that are more beloved by the runners.
I don't take myself out to say which way is the better one, but I'm expecting to see the votes being on favor of the first group over the latter,
or at least one or two managers I would place in said.
On a side not, there's a lot of manager discussion going on right now (or am I just thinking there is?). Not talking about the "list your favorite campaign" spam threads, but rather decent discussion.
As managers we act like kind of middlemans between the both sides, and there certainly are some that are more popular with enrolled users,
and some that are more beloved by the runners.
I don't take myself out to say which way is the better one, but I'm expecting to see the votes being on favor of the first group over the latter,
or at least one or two managers I would place in said.
On a side not, there's a lot of manager discussion going on right now (or am I just thinking there is?). Not talking about the "list your favorite campaign" spam threads, but rather decent discussion.
I saw a thread regarding best campaign manager and i observed that the ranking is just based on OP's opinion. So i will launch a poll to survey the pulse of all members here based on who they preferred to manage a signature campaign. Goodluck!
Note: Please avoid arguing on others opinion. And the result of this will be transfer to this thread:https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/list-of-best-campaign-managers-in-bct-0962016-1609687
Credits to the owner of this idea.
Note: Please avoid arguing on others opinion. And the result of this will be transfer to this thread:https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/list-of-best-campaign-managers-in-bct-0962016-1609687
Credits to the owner of this idea.
Jump to: