Topic: 🥇BEST CASINO IN 2023 - Community decide🥇 - page 2. (Read 603 times)

For you maybe but for the majority? They think a casino is great just because they like the bonus offered. For a few, they think it was great when they like the games offered. And the list goes on. No casino that have all the good features. That is almost impossible.

This is why we have so many casinos right now because some of them are unique. But, what is that poll you are talking about? I can't see it in the first page. Did the op remove it? but why? Though its great if they extend their question to the casinos staff because staffs knows something that a regular customer don't know. It will also be better if they can reach out the casino owner.

I was thinking about that, or maybe simply a poll linked to the OP would work, like iv4n said. Even Slow death's idea could work, but it would be good to have an easy way to vote and see the results.

I'm curious about the overall perception the members of this forum have on the mentioned casinos, but reading one by one their replies will be too much work for many.

And this forum has become like a service place that can provide lists of trusted casinos to people looking for them. They don't have to worry about choosing a casino from the lists of casinos already made by many reputable members, so those people will also have their own casino list.

Members who have shared their casino listings publicly have earned such a reputation on these forums that it is a guarantee that what they provide is truly trustworthy. So people can use the casino list properly and comfortably when gambling later.

The forum is getting heavier on gambling sites that are advertising their businesses here and I think it's a good thing because many of these sports bookies and casinos are using cryptocurrencies too. This forum is actually my go-to place if I want to look for a reputable gambling site.
I think we should also give credits to the members that are helping out to dig the histories, features, and credentials of each gambling business. Very much appreciated.
Here are my top choices.
1. Sportsbet.io
2. Stake.com
3. Betnomi

First thing that come to mind when a casino is mentioned is the reputation of the casino and how exciting their features are, casino lately are well aware of the competitions in the market and at that the two cardinal points most gamblers look out for are, one the reputation of the casino, thos has to do with how much the casino can allow a gambler to withdraw with many issues, and what are the standing cases against the casino.

Also, the amount of latest development in the network is very important because new games and features are most exciting for gamblers and even though thoughtheythe exceptional features of the casino will still keep the player.

If I can suggest something, it would be better if you can provide a hyperlink for every casino listed in your thread, OP.

For example, if you click on this link, DUELBITS, it will directly transfer you to their ANN thread with ease and convenience. This would give the general viewers a brief background and impression regarding the certain gambling website and if they are currently active in a corresponding signature campaign.

Though this may require some time and effort, I believe that it would be worth it given that we are voting for the best casino this 2023.

bottomline, we can determine if the casino is good considering the various features it is offering to its customers. not only in one aspect it is leading but the general features that a decent casino should have.
what i like about this poll is that they managed to interview some of the staffs of the casino and directly asked some good questions.

First, let me commend you on this initiative and to see that you practically covered every casino we are familiar with here in the forum, but then I do not know the mechanisms you used in listing the casinos, do you use the alphabetical order Yes them you made a few mistakes I can see that the casino on the S roll is not properly arranged both in Alphabet and rankings.

Because casinos like Stake should have come first on the list instead of Starbets, you may check again to make every possible correction.

An extensive review of these finalists would be great for a lot of casuals and pros looking to play to other casinos apart from the ones they're used to. They will get an insight on how well these casinos are handling their peers and also their players which might help them decide whether to play for that casino or not. In part, it will also help the casinos that are rated higher in this thread get some more visibility - kinda like free advertisement to them.

It would also be good if there are best in some categories for each categories, for example fastest customer service response time, withdraw time, and other such criteria that aren't subjective.

There are a lot of things that are needed to be considered when deciding which casino is actually the best, starting from the user interface and how user-friendly the platform is, how it treats its customers, what kind of games it offers (especially originals), whether it offers all kinds of gambling including sports betting, live betting, etc.

And on top of everything, whether it has a good reputation and trust among the community or not, and considering all these points, I would definitely go with Stake, it has got almost everything that I mentioned.

This is indeed and great initiative, and like bitbollo said, this is a great opportunity for some casinos, most especially those with less or no marketing running at the moment..
To actually proof this, amongst the list of casinos already made by op, casinos I know there are not up to 10, so from this thread, ive seen new casinos that probably do not have thread on this forum.

Was going to suggest some Casinos to be added to the list, but after going through the list again, more carefully this time, i discovers that majorly all the casinos I was going to suggest are already on the list..

Anyways, goodluck to every casino on the list already.

it is certainly a good initiative and also an opportunity for casinos to gain visibility.
It would also be nice to have "categories" such as the casino with the best cashback, the best graphics more and more...
something similar to bitcointalk awards....

I don't know if it has already been suggested but I would introduce limitations on who can vote, for example users who have received a certain number of merits / who actively participate in the section etc etc

That's great to hear! And it's nice to see someone passionate about a topic, especially when it can benefit other members of the community. It will be interesting to see the results.

As for the voting process, you can take some guidance from the annual Bitcointalk Community Awards.

I like this idea, it will be a lot of work. however, i have a passion for this industry and I'm happy to do it with a little bit of help from the community here

I could add 10-15 finalist based on the comments here, Stake is obviously one of them.
When we have 10-15 finalists, we can do a proper review of all of them, and then we could figure out a way to do a fair voting,

I will also add some more info about the casinos we have listed already, so everyone have a better overview of what they offer.

no rush, I want this competition to be as fair as possible.

I never imagined that this forum already has many reputable and well-known casinos. That is a list of casinos that might be our choice in gambling, but we have to select them to find the best for us. I chose Stake because I can choose as many gambling games as I want there. And every time I gamble, I change games, especially slot games. But there are some other casinos that I occasionally go to and gamble too, and it's great if we have a list of other casinos to gamble at so we don't choose the wrong casino.

An interesting idea! The OP should definitely implement something like that in the voting process. Of course, there may be some concerns about potential manipulation or fake votes for the worst casino category. One way to mitigate this could be to require voters to provide a detailed explanation of why they consider a particular casino to be bad. For example, this could include specific instances of poor customer service, slow withdrawals, unfair practices, or anything else that the users consider important.

Expanding on the idea of voting for the best and the worst casino, OP could create additional categories for voters to choose their favorites. This would provide a more comprehensive and diverse view of what each casino has to offer and could help players make more informed decisions when choosing where to play. For example, we could have categories such as the best bonuses and perks, the casino with the most generous loyalty program, the casino with the widest selection of games, the one with the best customer support, the one that offers the fastest and most efficient deposits and withdrawals, the most innovative casino, etc.

I realize that it may be a considerable amount of work for the OP, I believe that the end result would be worth the effort. By allowing forum members to vote for the best casino in specific categories it would provide a more accurate and detailed representation of each casino's strengths and weaknesses. This would not only benefit the voters but also the casinos themselves by providing valuable feedback on areas they can improve.

So, what do you all think?

in my opinion the best casino is stake.com and for this vote to be more fair you would have to put the name of the user in the OP of this thread and next to the casino he voted for and of course each forum user should make a post in which it said which casino he voted for, that way it would be easier for everyone to see that user X voted for casino Z and his post in which he voted is on page 3 or 4 of the thread, that way it would avoid fraud, as I've seen many sites where there are false reviews for the benefit of a certain casino so avoiding that would be a very good thing

now to make it even fairer you also need to vote for the worst casino of the year, of course all those casinos that are on the voting list for the best casino will also be the same ones that will be on the worst casino voting list, the members of forum will choose the worst casino and need to mention why they consider it the worst casino.

for example in each forum member's post it would look something like this:

first best casino:

reason:

second best casino:

reason:

third best casino:

reason:

first worst casino:

reason:

second worst casino:

reason:

third worst casino:

reason:

with that every new person who went to do research on some casino and discovered this research would look at each member's posts and see what each member thinks of the best and worst casinos and it would be easy for that person to choose the casino he wants to use

And since being completely objective is very difficult, as each person may have their preferences regarding the games they like or the weight they give to particular characteristics of a casino, then I think it would make more sense that instead of voting for the best casino tiers were created, so on the first tier the best casinos which excel at almost any aspect we may think of were grouped in no particular order, then on tier two good casinos will be grouped and so on, to me this makes the most sense, but who knows I could be wrong about it.

OP, in as much as you are trying to do a good job, atleast while doing it here, you should be able to coordinate your thread properly. Your  actions of replying in a row seems too occupied. You alone cannot make up a thread with your reply alone, do well to quote reply questions and opinions together so as to create room for coordination and orderliness on your thread.
I suggest you have a look at it then do the judgement yourself.