yes and it cost 60% more lol
Than nVidia cards? No way.
The nVidia cards that are on par with the nano regarding hash rate are even more expensive.
Anyhow, it's true though, core clock @ 1000, even with a heavy modified bios will still use up to much energy.
The holy grail setting (for me at least) is 800 core, 300 mem. Best Hash/power setting.
nvidia 970 cost around 300 now new, nano is 500, consumption is the same without your mod, or even worse for nano
i know you did get a discount for you nano, but that's not what casual miners will get, we must be realistic here
For the same consumption, I think the hashing of nano is higher. Even without mod, you just need to reduce the voltage in MSI afterburner.
True..
Dont' know what the hashrate on a 970 (Ethereum) is, but when mining with a nano (stock 1000 core) at -100mV in afterburner it will use around 4.9A (1000 watt) for 6 cards. 175-180Mh/s
I have a small feeling that a 970 isn't going to beat that...
mine does 22 mega and with six card i'm consuming exactly 1k, but the overall hashrate is not 180, like the nano, but 132, so 25-30% loss, but they cost 40% less
also i think that the g1 gaming from nvidia is much more easy to resell than the nano, acerage gamers do not like to buy expensive card
My AMD R9 nano with undervoltage and underclock, with 6, it does 160MH/s, but with 800W power consumption.
You can go even lower with my Bios mod
Thanks for your efforts. I used your Nano mod, it works perfectly. I think the power consumption of the memory part is reduced a lot.