Liquidity is not an issue in crypto for the vast majority of people, especially if you exclude garbage coins that shouldn't be traded in the first place.
In the few instances where liquidity is of concern, simply spreading your orders throughout multiple exchanges either won't be possible or it won't be practicable.
And if you're going to throw your money at a hedge fund type of venture, which would run into liquidity issues due to sheer volume, there's better options than Omega.
There's absolutely nothing that I can immediately identify that makes this fund special and competitive and it looks like a collection of buzz words.
I will read the paper through carefully sometime this weekend though and report back if I find anything valuable, but in the meantime it looks like just another set of people trying to ride the blockchain hype train.
I get your point and i makes sense, still i see the benefit OmegaOne could bring to the crypto world. Sure if for smaller trading it is not the most interesting new comer. But specially for companies or big investors the current system with multiple over priced exchangs is a nightmare. And honestly even small investor and trader feel all the small fees taken between platforms. I am not sure were this ICO is going but i am looking forward to upgrades in this field like Pillar as well.