Pages:
Author

Topic: Best signature campaign Managers (Read 577 times)

jr. member
Activity: 52
Merit: 1
October 03, 2020, 11:22:48 AM
#29
Thanks, everyone for the recommendations!  Going through them all and will be sending over few questions to each. Grin
jr. member
Activity: 52
Merit: 1
October 03, 2020, 09:30:20 AM
#28
I can only vouch for cryptoprenuerBrainboss, Hhampuz and Yahoo62278 cause i have work withthem before and they done a pretty good job.

Thanks! in touch with each of them.
legendary
Activity: 3766
Merit: 4554
Contact @yahoo62278 on telegram for marketing
October 03, 2020, 09:22:19 AM
#27
The OP asked for a list of managers, he got that within the 1st couple posts. Rest of you are just spamming the topic and it's not cool. I'm sure all the managers mentioned appreciate you voting, but this thread I doubt was intended for that purpose.
legendary
Activity: 3374
Merit: 1824
October 03, 2020, 07:07:07 AM
#26
When I first joined the forum and was a young member, definitely the best campain manager back then was Stuna.
His campaigns were then the best in terms of payment and everything else.
For the last year or two the best manager has been Hhampuz.
legendary
Activity: 3080
Merit: 1292
Hhampuz for Campaign management
October 03, 2020, 06:48:38 AM
#25
Actually there's a lot of good campaign managers in the forum, all the managers listed above are good managers, they can do the job but it actually depends on the needs of the advertisers and for sure these managers are very much flexible. I would recommend the managers that I have work now and in the past.

Yahoo62278
Hhampuz

DarkStar_ work with him once IIRC.

and also sujonali1819 who is currently the campaign manager of Blackjack.fun
legendary
Activity: 2114
Merit: 1150
https://bitcoincleanup.com/
October 03, 2020, 06:31:26 AM
#24
I'm vouching for these best managers here on the forum Yahoo62277
That last digit should be "8"  Wink

Although this is not a popularity contest, I'm also adding my vote to this manager.
legendary
Activity: 3052
Merit: 1273
October 03, 2020, 05:04:14 AM
#23
If it's for experienced managers, then 3-4 minutes might sound possible. Though being manager is not all about counting posts. You have to respond any question, complain, application which your inbox and telegram will be full of them.

Tbh, I know about some managers who do an in-depth analysis of their campaign participants to assure that the participants did well by helping the campaign through advertising it during the whole week. It's not an easy job to manage a campaign, takes a lot of efforts even if you consider it a 2 hour job. The time a manager will take to grade a sheet will depend on how many users are actually involved in the campaign, and other factors too including, but not limited to:
- Counting posts based on allowed and restricted forum boards.
- Checking if they have made specific number of posts in a mentioned board or not (like minimum x posts in Gambling).
- Checking the time gaps to see if there is any burstposting / spam or not.
- Seeing if a user received a negative trust? If yes, how valid is it? And then deciding whether to keep that user or not.
- Rectifying any errors (if made) while counting and correcting them.
- Sending the funds to users timely.

So tbh, it's a high-responsibility job regardless of the time it takes to be done.

Quote
Anyway I'm not against self-managed campaign. We can see Best Change's campaign run well until now. But having an experienced user to handle it will be more effective imo especially for a new project, which the project owner could be more focused on developing the project or promoting it to other platform(s).

Well, when we speak about a WHOLE PROJECT, we already know that they work with a team and not just one single developer. So if they try to manage their own campaign by assigning one of their own employees, then I don't think there's anything wrong as they will also hire their marketing expert only and when you already know how Best change did it, I don't think any other example suits here. However, having this forum's campaign managers represent their project here will work as a charm as they already have the experience of handling these campaigns and most importantly, they (the managers) have their reputation attached to their (company's) campaigns which is an icing on the cake. Wink
legendary
Activity: 2366
Merit: 1130
October 03, 2020, 04:03:42 AM
#22
Service dissucsion board is more appropriate than here i think since OP only want to know list of campaogn managers on this forum (they didn't told us he will contact one of them though). And stop give any same reply on this thread to OP
TGD
hero member
Activity: 1288
Merit: 620
Wen Rolex?
October 03, 2020, 03:26:05 AM
#21
I agree on most the names listed above as a good campaign manager like yahoo and hhampuz but if the OP is planning to hire a campaign manager then maybe he should consider too the number of the campaign that the manager is currently managing at the same time because it might impact the accuracy of there work, We are all just people and we all have limitation. Maybe he should consider underrated campaign manager that has no or few campaign managing. This is only my opinion that might help to choose wisely.  Wink
legendary
Activity: 2464
Merit: 2094
October 02, 2020, 11:51:37 PM
#20
I'm sure the OP has listened to the advice and recommendation for the best campaign manager so far. They are very popular with good management services. Hhampuz is my best manager of choice and Yahoo is my second. However, if you want to get some other thing like bonuses, then there's nothing wrong with contacting @tranthidung even though they're still new to campaign management. You can use his services and get some attractive offer from him and what's wrong. Let's take a look at who you choose, now you have several choices between the best one and the one that suits your need.

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/archived-5241800
sr. member
Activity: 1936
Merit: 290
October 02, 2020, 11:24:52 PM
#19
Yes of course here some professional manager and you can rent there services. Like here Hhampuz and Yahoo62278 very trustful manager so you can contact btt pm or telegram.
Yahoo62278 management service here:
portfolio
Hhampuz management service here:
portfolio
legendary
Activity: 2156
Merit: 2100
Marketing Campaign Manager |Telegram ID- @LT_Mouse
October 02, 2020, 09:39:04 PM
#18
OP, you can have a visit in my portfolio- https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/available-signature-bounty-campaign-manager-lm-management-5180747
After that, it takes around 1-2 minutes per person per week to check their posts and a few minutes more to initiate a batch transaction.
If you recruit some new people in your campaign whom you have not work with before, that will take huge time to check and count post. Only counting the numbers are not enough. You have to check quality, you have to check whether users are posting in aappropriate board, whether users are engaging with the community and some more.
And yeah, it's true that when you recruit people whom yu have worked couple of times, in that case, you know their posting habit and thus, it will take you less time than the previous scenerio.
hero member
Activity: 2464
Merit: 594
October 02, 2020, 09:25:09 PM
#17
I'm vouching for these best managers here on the forum Yahoo62278, Hhampuz, Crytopreneurbrainboss, and last but not the least Coolcryptovator.  Whoever you choose among them I am sure they will do the job well.  Any of them can be given the expected result to spread the good news of your product, service offered, or any other kind as long as of course do not just Ponzi scheme.  I have not experienced any problems in handling their campaigns because they are professionals and they really know what they are doing.
legendary
Activity: 3234
Merit: 1375
Slava Ukraini!
October 02, 2020, 06:50:38 PM
#16
I suggest managing your own signature campaign. Why outsource it? It's simple enough, choose high quality applicants based on their posting history, merit history, reputation, and sections they usually post in...

After that, it takes around 1-2 minutes per person per week to check their posts and a few minutes more to initiate a batch transaction.

Be efficient and keep it in house and funnel that money back into your signature campaign to keep it running longer.
It's an option if you want to save some money, but I think it would be best to let professionals to do their job. There is not so many successful campaigns managed by someone from that project. While we have enough bad examples. I think that for someone who is new to this forum and not very familiar with things here like merit, reputation, burst posting and etc, it may be difficult to manage campaign and choose best posters

OP, I vouch for Hhampuz, but if you want to check and compare available managers, you can check link posted by @BitcoinGirl.Club
hero member
Activity: 2884
Merit: 579
Hire Bitcointalk Camp. Manager @ r7promotions.com
October 02, 2020, 05:43:29 PM
#15
All of the managers that have been mentioned were all good and professional in handling campaigns. I'd like to add our campaign manager in the campaign that I'm currently in.

Roycilik.
hero member
Activity: 2632
Merit: 787
Jack of all trades 💯
October 02, 2020, 05:11:24 PM
#14
Does anyone have a good list of signature campaign managers?

Thanks!

Hhampuz and Yahoo will give you a quality run so choose them for betterment of your campaign since for sure you will get a good engagement if you select those top managers here, Don't go with cheap since they will just give you a not good result.
legendary
Activity: 2086
Merit: 1282
Logo Designer ⛨ BSFL Division1
October 02, 2020, 05:06:33 PM
#13
Does anyone have a good list of signature campaign managers?

Thanks!
If your campaign is Bitcoin related then I would suggest choosing only top managers like Hhampuz, Yahoo62278 or Coolcryptovator.
Here is one more list with currently most active managers:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/find-your-managers-5228596
legendary
Activity: 2982
Merit: 1506
Pie Baking Contest: https://tinyurl.com/2s3z6dee
October 02, 2020, 04:19:17 PM
#12
Even if it takes longer than 2 minutes, it can't take more than 3-4 minutes even manually checking and scanning many of the threads.

With 20 participants, that's 1 hour to 1.33 hours tops, add in a little extra for the processing time, calculations, updating the spreadsheet etc, it's a 2 hour/week job.

I just think keeping it in-house will benefit the forum more than outsourcing it. Though I'm not sure how much signature managers charge, it might be cost-effective to have an expert handle it (e.g. if it's under ~$150/week)

If it's for experienced managers, then 3-4 minutes might sound possible. Though being manager is not all about counting posts. You have to respond any question, complain, application which your inbox and telegram will be full of them.

Anyway I'm not against self-managed campaign. We can see Best Change's campaign run well until now. But having an experienced user to handle it will be more effective imo especially for a new project, which the project owner could be more focused on developing the project or promoting it to other platform(s).
legendary
Activity: 2030
Merit: 1189
October 02, 2020, 04:03:15 PM
#11
I suggest managing your own signature campaign. Why outsource it? It's simple enough, choose high quality applicants based on their posting history, merit history, reputation, and sections they usually post in...

After that, it takes around 1-2 minutes per person per week to check their posts and a few minutes more to initiative a batch transaction.

Be efficient and keep it in house and funnel that money back into your signature campaign to keep it running longer.

Managing the campaign for your own project is indeed saving your money. But checking the posts of your participants in 2 minutes per user. Really? If it's that simple, then everyone even me is able to be a manager. A good manager will check the thread of his participants posted on as well to make sure that the posts are contributive to the issue from OP and not repeating the same answer by previous posters. I don't think it could be done in 2 minutes. In the past there were several signature campaigns that running with bot only without manager. But nowadays the number of spammers are too damn high so mostly (if not all) managers have to check the posts manually.

Even if it takes longer than 2 minutes, it can't take more than 3-4 minutes even manually checking and scanning many of the threads.

With 20 participants, that's 1 hour to 1.33 hours tops, add in a little extra for the processing time, calculations, updating the spreadsheet etc, it's a 2 hour/week job.

I just think keeping it in-house will benefit the forum more than outsourcing it. Though I'm not sure how much signature managers charge, it might be cost-effective to have an expert handle it (e.g. if it's under ~$150/week)
legendary
Activity: 2982
Merit: 1506
Pie Baking Contest: https://tinyurl.com/2s3z6dee
October 02, 2020, 03:57:03 PM
#10
I suggest managing your own signature campaign. Why outsource it? It's simple enough, choose high quality applicants based on their posting history, merit history, reputation, and sections they usually post in...

After that, it takes around 1-2 minutes per person per week to check their posts and a few minutes more to initiative a batch transaction.

Be efficient and keep it in house and funnel that money back into your signature campaign to keep it running longer.

Managing the campaign for your own project is indeed saving your money. But checking the posts of your participants in 2 minutes per user. Really? If it's that simple, then everyone even me is able to be a manager. A good manager will check the thread of his participants posted on as well to make sure that the posts are contributive to the issue from OP and not repeating the same answer by previous posters. I don't think it could be done in 2 minutes. In the past there were several signature campaigns that running with bot only without manager. But nowadays the number of spammers are too damn high so mostly (if not all) managers have to check the posts manually.
Pages:
Jump to: