<...>
Don't propagate false information. That is simply not true. To my knowledge, no company pays campaign participants for what they say on the forum. That would be an immoral marketing practice. It is simply a matter of renting a signature space from forum members to wear their ads.
From your signature, I see that you are also interested in signature campaigns; perhaps it would be a good idea to learn a little more about them.
Lmfao
you tell me to learn more about them and accuse me of spreading false info, while including (To my knowledge) in your statement like i'm uneducated on the subject while you're not even confident with your own knowledge of it, that or you know what your saying is bs and you want to option of playing innocent when someone calls you on it.
But
lets look at the rules of the campaign you signed up to
Make a minimum of 10 constructive posts in the Gambling section each week in order to receive a payment. These 10 will count towards the 25 post minimum weekly requirement.
and lets look at what you have contributed to this thread
~
That's not surprising because last time OP posted something on this forum before that post was more than 8 months ago. But I think it doesn't mean that all our suggestions were useless. Unless he deletes the thread(which he can't do), Google will be redirecting people searching for "Best Site for Gambling" to this place, and they will be able to read all our recommendations and the discussion.
Yeah, I agree. A thread like this is certainly not useless. I found most of the information in existing topics, so I'm certain this one will help many as well. However, it can be quite annoying when people come to the forum, open a new topic, ask a question, and then never return again.
Not useless, and will help many people huh?
<...>
Considering we are in the Gambling section, it is unlikely that we'll see this happen so soon.
I think it is best for the moderators to lock this topic, and thus stop the pointless discussion.
Pointless discussion? you just said it wasn't useless and in fact helpful for people
I hope you realize you are replying to a question asked more than three months ago and the OP has not been active on the forum since last year.
Although I understand that this thread is still active, I think one should take into account the current state of the discussion and not just randomly quote someone's post without taking into account what has already been said.
Oh you hope he realizes hes replying to an old thread? just like you're doing to get that post count up?
<...>
Don't propagate false information. That is simply not true. To my knowledge, no company pays campaign participants for what they say on the forum. That would be an immoral marketing practice. It is simply a matter of renting a signature space from forum members to wear their ads.
From your signature, I see that you are also interested in signature campaigns; perhaps it would be a good idea to learn a little more about them.
You're saying (((no company pays campaign participants for what they say on the forum))) you have been paid 4times so far, for contradicting yourself and contributing nothing to the conversation..... but i know what you really meant, you mean they don't publicly say you will be disqualified for negative feedback about them, and i know for a fact some don't which is why i am looking... .. but you're not stupid, you know the managers decide what counts as a constructive post and they don't need a reason to kick you. i know, you know, anyone interested in this conversation knows the only reason you jumped at the chance to accuse me of spreading false information is because you got paid about 3$ to share your chimp logic.
i took time to write and share my opinion, i'm aware op isnt active, but like your first reply, i knew it would be helpful to more than just the op.
and you may think i was talking negatively about the people promoting their signatures, or even the sites themselves, i'm not.
I was pointing out an obvious fact, that there is an incentive for the people recommending them to do so. and that people should do their own research on these sites instead of basing their decision on other people with this incentive saying they're trustworthy.