and i normally dont like to point out obvious things like 2 were 1 month ago and 1 was today, so i assume tht conversation happened before today since they said there were only 2 deposits
You're right -- it did happen before today. It was yesterday. Great observation.
And re-read the text. What he said is that there were two deposits "
for less than the minimum we accept." Great super-sleuthing, there, Scooby Doo, but I think you're in the wrong room.
Pro tip: 20.7 mBTC is above the criteria of "
less than the minimum we accept," but I do applaud your efforts.
you deposited 0.00015 two times and those were the two deposits he seen pretty obvious.. but im not gonna go back and forth with you because 0.00015 twice is .3mbtc which is less than 1mbtc which is their minimum.. case closed
im kinda seeing why live support didnt wanna talk to you
0.15+0.15=0.3
20.7-20=0.7
0.3+0.7=1.0
Basic mathematics.
It was obvious the first chat you posted was before the 3rd deposit showed up, so you are mixing and calling people scammers and twisting things around.... and like i said all you had to do was talk to them
Not sure if you're just trying to pad your post count or what. My last post here actually confirms everything I've said, from Betcoin themselves,
. In fact, they changed their site as a result of it. I applaud your erroneous efforts, though. You were trying so hard!
Im not trying to pad shit you seem like you are trying post count up for sig i have no reason to if you would have just contacted support AFTER the third one was there and didnt have only TWO micro transactions showing on your account and then turn around and talk shit about a site where I've grown to kinda like the staff there and the community as a whole with twisted posts that have no dates on them ... and if you notice my first reply to you could have ended but now your turning it against me when i was just pointing out something obvious... sad a newbie knows better than to call scammer on something legit and hero member cant figure it out...
You realize that not only have I referred well over 100 users to Betcoin over the past 13 months (and even have posts as recent as a few days ago persuading players to join the site), but I've also reviewed them highly positively on both my site and a couple of others, right? The last thing I wanted to do was take this public. Out of all the sites I know of that deal with poker, Betcoin has always been my favorite in the past. They were always the first choice. In fact,
Betcoin is one of the very first sites I personally reviewed when I released my own site a couple weeks ago, and has its place as the first one players find when looking for Bitcoin poker sites. I don't have a good reputation around here because I target random sites and try to destroy their reputation. It's very rare that I'll post anything negative about ANY site, in fact. It's only when someone's unwilling to resolve their problems. 99.9% of the time, everything is resolved via private chats and/or support -- something I spent many hours trying to get their support to do yesterday before I finally gave up.
Quit trying to twist things and make them seem like something they're not. I have more than enough proof of my statements, and now Betcoin has admitted their fault, altered their FAQs by removing the infringing statement, and by my book, everything is fine now.
You're delusional, at best, attempting to make up some fairy tale story that not only doesn't match any of the proof I've posted before, but is also shown to be false by Betcoin themselves. Move on. You're not going to magically turn it into something it's not, no matter how hard you try.
From this point forward, I will not respond to your posts.