It has been years that BFG token is existing and it seems, it is continuously surviving despite the launched of other casino tokens.
We may not see the fast pace when it comes to market performance, but for me, it is one of the few casino tokens that is actually surviving.
I once held this token, staked but finally decided to let go as I couldn't keep up with their updates and developments.
But as long as the casino is attracting players and they are generating income, their token has the chance to improve its price in the market.
On the one hand, it can indeed be said that the BFG token is still surviving. On the other hand, this "survival" makes no sense for potential investors, as the BFG token is in a prolonged stagnation due to the fact that the Betfury team has no plans for the BFG token's future. Honestly, I don't remember the last time the Betfury team made any announcements regarding the development of the BFG token.
And it seems to me that the BFG token is not worse but not better than other tokens.
The only difference from tokens, of which there are thousands and even now tens of thousands, is that it was issued by the casino and, accordingly, if the casino continues to operate, then the likelihood that such a token will completely scamed and disappear is very small. Most likely, various casino devs token initiatives will return periodically and from time to time.
We should also not forget that in such a tough bear market as it is now, nothing particularly good should be expected from any token, not just from BFG. But as a gaming token, it may well ecist for a long time and even increase in price as the glibal cryptocurrency market itself grows. This, by the way, depends a lot of course on how many players use the services of the casino itself and whether there is a positive trend in terms of increasing the number of players and attracting new players who decide to change the casino and the games where they play.
So I think that everything with this token is not so bad so far.
Well, with respect to other tokens, things may be that the tokens are still around, we cannot expect less than a token when there are many investors who put money there and will not leave this token until it rises properly, too It is necessary to highlight what they say, the bitcoin market is somewhat hit and these things can make things more difficult with tokens, bitcoin has dropped in price and that is something that affects all cryptocurrencies, whether they like it or not, they affect, because there is a panic, in these tokens things are usually different, perhaps the token maintains its price because investors do not want the price to drop further and that is why they do not sell, perhaps they have invested so much money that they do not want to lose It is not good to make an investment to earn more and get out with less, it is not a business, if you have waited a long time for it to go up, you can wait a little longer to wait for the price to go up, and that goes up at any time , at what time? I don't know, but it will happen, and for me when it rises and there is a new ATH we will see how this token behaves, from the way things look it can and should rise, the bad thing is that they haven't done it a lot of strength, there is no relevant publicity, which makes investors interested in buying this token.
Currently there is also another token from a casino that is quite interesting, it is relatively new, and it has a great community, I don't know but they are doing things well, and what can be done here is that those in charge of the project give it life, bring innovations, promise that they will implement it in a centralized exchange, so that it is more trustworthy, if they name a good exchange, I am sure that investors will be interested and buy the token, because they know that it has The moment he is inside the exchange, things will be better for them, because an exchange gives a project a lot of credibility and makes it grow.
Of course, listing on some major exchange is always useful for the development of a particular token.
I remember here in the thread before it was quite often asked the question that for the development of BFG it would be great if the devs would get it listed on Binance.
However, this issue has gradually calmed down and, as I assume, there is no such intention in the plans of devs now.
However, I myself do not really support such a listing, for the reason that it is probably very expensive and difficult, and you can choose some other exchange that is simpler than Binance.
Trading on Biswap seems to me to be rather sluggish and it would probably be worth adding some other exchange for trading.
But all these questions are naturally solved only by devs and only they have complete information about what is right to do with the token.
Exactly, there are many of the loqs that we are here in the forum, we have had experience with groups that make projects and develop the topken in a spectacular way, but they always let the project die for not wanting to take the best step and the one that will leave and make them jump to triumph and that is it, just include it in a recognized exchange, they are not even asked to be in BInance or in any 1A exchange, just being known is enough in an exchange that is highly recognized by traders and people who know that They are good excahnges, because as you say, Binance had faith that they could include it, but I don't know why the devs don't want that commitment, it's like they had a fear or something in particular, and that's what stops a project, one coin and it doesn't let them jump to success, personally I think it's a shame, because a project like this, which has so much community and aside from the fact that they have been very successful in the forum, fails to take the best of all steps and it is to launch it towards a good exchange, decentralized exchanges seem annoying to me, they seem insecure, easy to hack, and it is not something that gives me great security, because I know that there are many smart contracts that can be similar and that can confuse players and traders who do not have much Experience , the Advantage of a Centralized exchange is its security, support, the ease of the environment within the exchange , so these things apart from being better, have and can have a volume of considerable capitalization.
I want to know if the fear on the part of the devs who do not put their tokens in a Decentralized exchange, what is it? the nameless? or what is it that they can fear him ? Many of us who are in the forum know that the main reason for a token to go away is that the don't give them a move or put it in a centralized exchange, because investors get anxious and leave, they don't believe in the project and they leave everything there. , then these things are the ones to avoid, since they bring a lot of Development and advancement in the BFG token , it is not worth letting it die.