Author

Topic: BetKing.io - 20% Rakeback Christmas Bonus - Most trusted Bitcoin Dice site - page 124. (Read 194693 times)

hero member
Activity: 590
Merit: 500
Yeah I hope it's just an update  Wink
legendary
Activity: 2436
Merit: 1561
Today is not the best Bitcoin day. PocketRocketCasino down?

Looks like just an update:

"Pocket Rockets Casino is offline temporarily while updates are being made.
We'll be back in a bit..."
hero member
Activity: 590
Merit: 500
Today is not the best Bitcoin day. PocketRocketCasino down?
full member
Activity: 205
Merit: 100
Investor / Trader / Analyst
4 days left to beat the 20 loss streak at 49.5%!
full member
Activity: 205
Merit: 100
Investor / Trader / Analyst
Update on streak stats please
legendary
Activity: 3668
Merit: 6382
Looking for campaign manager? Contact icopress!
Nice big win this morning for User9517

In the competition djarno is now ahead for most wagered with 3224 wagered.

Wilco still in lead with the most bets with almost 725,000.

Will need to calculate streaks but seems melds39 is in the lead with 20 losses in a row.


Nice win and interesting stats!
I like to see such an active site admin. Great job! (And great contest!!!)
member
Activity: 78
Merit: 10
congrats on the new site, looks really good.
full member
Activity: 205
Merit: 100
Investor / Trader / Analyst

Will need to calculate streaks but seems melds39 is in the lead with 20 losses in a row.


pfft. No need. no one can beat that. Wilco needs to stop betting.
hero member
Activity: 590
Merit: 500
Lucky win for that user.
And congrats admin you are one of the most active dice owner here Wink
legendary
Activity: 882
Merit: 1000
Just lowered the bet throttle times for small bets by 50% so if botting smaller amounts you should get in twice as many bets per minute now.
legendary
Activity: 882
Merit: 1000
Nice big win this morning for User9517


Also just moved some more funds over to the investors wallet since there was some concern the other day about that.

In the competition djarno is now ahead for most wagered with 3224 wagered.

Wilco still in lead with the most bets with almost 725,000.

Will need to calculate streaks but seems melds39 is in the lead with 20 losses in a row.

sr. member
Activity: 462
Merit: 250
the leveraged risk thing is a cool feature but i think it puts the site on self-destruct mode. all it takes is a nakowa to enter the ring and things could be wiped out pretty easily since it seems like there has been a +leveraged arms race, lol.

Even if the website did get cleaned to a "nakowa", I highly doubt prc would be destroyed. Most of the investors don't have 100% of their bankroll invested and there's always new investors. Either way, it's the investors choice what kelly he/she chooses.
hero member
Activity: 1328
Merit: 563
MintDice.com | TG: t.me/MintDice
the leveraged risk thing is a cool feature but i think it puts the site on self-destruct mode. all it takes is a nakowa to enter the ring and things could be wiped out pretty easily since it seems like there has been a +leveraged arms race, lol.
legendary
Activity: 882
Merit: 1000
I noticed a disturbance in the force this evening while getting stoned and I checked the PRC chat.

Appears people are having a withdraw issues, so I checked the cold wallet.

https://blockchain.info/address/1FhxjhFb1YudGC1vtV4FuLpQc2uHzq3XFd

Looks like 100 coins not there + Dean just said the hot wallet was empty.

It used to be the case that all user deposit addresses were offline addresses, so you can't just add up "hot wallet + published cold wallet", see that the total is less than the bankroll and scream "insolvent!" - because you would also need to include the balances of all the (presumably unknown) deposit addresses.

That's not to say the casino is solvent, just that you've not proved that it isn't.

It's not solvent because 100 btc isn't in the cold wallet?

If the invested doesn't add up to the number of coins in the wallet then you have a issue (obviously.)

Dean probably is solvent, but I was just wondering if there was any way he could prove it or if there it's only shown 93% and 7% in who knows where.

We used to have managers who would try to float our deposits over night and I'm just wondering if there is a $50,000 line of credit per say for Dean via BR.

It's been documented before that that address will have at least 90% of investor funds in it. At time of writing it has 93% so all good.

That is because some ends up being sent to a wallet to allow faster withdrawls.

If showing you have 90% or 93% rather than 100% is good for investors then I guess whatever floats their boat.

As Dooglus mentioned, all deposits go to an offline address. The funds will stay there until I either move them to investor cold storage or send to intermediate wallet or the hot wallet.

The intermediate is just to have quicker access to top up hot wallet instead of taking it from the investors wallet.

I'll move more over to the investors wallet tomorrow.
legendary
Activity: 4004
Merit: 1250
Owner at AltQuick.com
I noticed a disturbance in the force this evening while getting stoned and I checked the PRC chat.

Appears people are having a withdraw issues, so I checked the cold wallet.

https://blockchain.info/address/1FhxjhFb1YudGC1vtV4FuLpQc2uHzq3XFd

Looks like 100 coins not there + Dean just said the hot wallet was empty.

It used to be the case that all user deposit addresses were offline addresses, so you can't just add up "hot wallet + published cold wallet", see that the total is less than the bankroll and scream "insolvent!" - because you would also need to include the balances of all the (presumably unknown) deposit addresses.

That's not to say the casino is solvent, just that you've not proved that it isn't.

It's not solvent because 100 btc isn't in the cold wallet?

If the invested doesn't add up to the number of coins in the wallet then you have a issue (obviously.)

Dean probably is solvent, but I was just wondering if there was any way he could prove it or if there it's only shown 93% and 7% in who knows where.

We used to have managers who would try to float our deposits over night and I'm just wondering if there is a $50,000 line of credit per say for Dean via BR.

It's been documented before that that address will have at least 90% of investor funds in it. At time of writing it has 93% so all good.

That is because some ends up being sent to a wallet to allow faster withdrawls.

If showing you have 90% or 93% rather than 100% is good for investors then I guess whatever floats their boat.
full member
Activity: 205
Merit: 100
Investor / Trader / Analyst
I noticed a disturbance in the force this evening while getting stoned and I checked the PRC chat.

Appears people are having a withdraw issues, so I checked the cold wallet.

https://blockchain.info/address/1FhxjhFb1YudGC1vtV4FuLpQc2uHzq3XFd

Looks like 100 coins not there + Dean just said the hot wallet was empty.

It used to be the case that all user deposit addresses were offline addresses, so you can't just add up "hot wallet + published cold wallet", see that the total is less than the bankroll and scream "insolvent!" - because you would also need to include the balances of all the (presumably unknown) deposit addresses.

That's not to say the casino is solvent, just that you've not proved that it isn't.

It's not solvent because 100 btc isn't in the cold wallet?
legendary
Activity: 882
Merit: 1000
I noticed a disturbance in the force this evening while getting stoned and I checked the PRC chat.

Appears people are having a withdraw issues, so I checked the cold wallet.

https://blockchain.info/address/1FhxjhFb1YudGC1vtV4FuLpQc2uHzq3XFd

Looks like 100 coins not there + Dean just said the hot wallet was empty.

Are the other coins stored in deposit addresses and could you possibly please prove that your solvent?

It's been documented before that that address will have at least 90% of investor funds in it. At time of writing it has 93% so all good.

That is because some ends up being sent to a wallet to allow faster withdrawls.
legendary
Activity: 4004
Merit: 1250
Owner at AltQuick.com
... just that you've not proved that it isn't.

If I had proof I would tag him through the trust here on Bitcointalk. (again)

I was just asking because the numbers don't match and I was interest in how he proves he actually has the coins or if only 90-95% of the coins are proven they are there and then people trust the other 5-10%.
legendary
Activity: 2940
Merit: 1333
I noticed a disturbance in the force this evening while getting stoned and I checked the PRC chat.

Appears people are having a withdraw issues, so I checked the cold wallet.

https://blockchain.info/address/1FhxjhFb1YudGC1vtV4FuLpQc2uHzq3XFd

Looks like 100 coins not there + Dean just said the hot wallet was empty.

It used to be the case that all user deposit addresses were offline addresses, so you can't just add up "hot wallet + published cold wallet", see that the total is less than the bankroll and scream "insolvent!" - because you would also need to include the balances of all the (presumably unknown) deposit addresses.

That's not to say the casino is solvent, just that you've not proved that it isn't.
legendary
Activity: 4004
Merit: 1250
Owner at AltQuick.com
I noticed a disturbance in the force this evening while getting stoned and I checked the PRC chat.

Appears people are having a withdraw issues, so I checked the cold wallet.

https://blockchain.info/address/1FhxjhFb1YudGC1vtV4FuLpQc2uHzq3XFd

Looks like 100 coins not there + Dean just said the hot wallet was empty.

Are the other coins stored in deposit addresses and could you possibly please prove that your solvent?
Jump to: