Pages:
Author

Topic: ⭐️ BETLLER.IO | 🤜 🤛 P2P Betting | 🏆 Wagering contest | 🎁 Bonus 30k satoshi (Read 1155 times)

global moderator
Activity: 3794
Merit: 2612
In a world of peaches, don't ask for apple sauce
Locked for incentivizing posting within the thread.
hero member
Activity: 3038
Merit: 617


This is p2p betting which a user will have to bet against someone else bet.  The so much DECLINE (RED MARK) means no one had bet against the user which means he won nothing  as well. This is not a sustainable model, there should have been a house after all we are betting in the 1 minute time frame otherwise it will just end up having a lot of DECLINE.
hero member
Activity: 2170
Merit: 530
My intention is to bet only 10 bets to qualify in Bitcoin Review Promo but When Im playing I forgot how many bets I already bet and really enjoy the game.

I see some issues in All bets HIGH and LOW, after betting in the last round some bets is still there for few seconds.

A piece of advice, moderators should keep the chatroom active like other betting casinos. Entertraining chatroom makes your bettor active.

Overall your website is so good, you just need to promote and find many active players.








hero member
Activity: 2926
Merit: 722
DGbet.fun - Crypto Sportsbook
^ At this moment there are 129 users currently online and I think that is not quite lacking of players.


The campaign signature was launched today, I guess probably it needs a few more weeks before it will bring good traffic. Through the giveaways and promotions, I am sure it will have a good result but not just quickly. Nevertheless, I have a small suggestion, I saw the chatbox no one was talking there. Probably it is good if you also have giveaways there to lure gamblers also to have more interesting conversations and somebody will surely stay on site.
Just like a gambling site? Maybe it would be nice to have this feature but for sure it wouldnt still make any difference at all.Why? People would be busy to trade
and analyze yet 1 minute result isnt really that long for the result of their bet.

About this site which i have seen their signature recently.So this is like a binary option have 1 minute Timeframe and there are similar platforms like this one like Betinance.
Wondering if these things do really gain attraction.
hero member
Activity: 2590
Merit: 644
^ At this moment there are 129 users currently online and I think that is not quite lacking of players.


The campaign signature was launched today, I guess probably it needs a few more weeks before it will bring good traffic. Through the giveaways and promotions, I am sure it will have a good result but not just quickly. Nevertheless, I have a small suggestion, I saw the chatbox no one was talking there. Probably it is good if you also have giveaways there to lure gamblers also to have more interesting conversations and somebody will surely stay on site.
legendary
Activity: 2436
Merit: 1189
Need Campaign Manager?PM on telegram @sujonali1819
Yesterday, I have played some bet with the giveaways BTC. It was smooth but lost the amount😀. The site design and Browsing speed is really very smooth. But the site is lack of players. I think this complain is from maximum players. But hope we will see some traffic of real players there since they started some promotional campaign.   
full member
Activity: 546
Merit: 120
very good in the process of deposit and withdrawal, I have tried it, even though a little written we have to wait 8 hours, but the withdrawal does not require a long time.
for the game I think this method is better than the others, because we can while knowing the real trading world, yes like this where the PO is determined by the position of the player itself.
newbie
Activity: 15
Merit: 0

I don't understand why you don't offer bonuses and Deposit-free entry like other casinos do. First you need to give something away to make a profit. Your profit is the players.
full member
Activity: 853
Merit: 114
Good site and good promo, but a little difficult to understand how to use the betting section initially. It would be good to have a tutorial section.
member
Activity: 143
Merit: 13
I've placed around 20 or so bets on the platform, everything went smoothly, there were no major hiccups.

Sometimes there were lag in the system and the odds displayed were somewhat skewed, e.g. when I bet 0.0001 BTC against 0.0001 BTC, the expected payout should have been 1.95x but the displayed odds were 1.45x for some odd reason. I still got 1.95x in a win, so it's probably just a frontend issue.

I'm very impressed in terms of the quickness of the withdrawal and the responsiveness of the team members, at least on the forum. I did manage to turn my 0.0003 BTC to 0.0013 BTC before withdrawing, which probably can be attributed to beginners luck  Cheesy

My suggestions would be as follows:
a) Have some sort of house game to ensure that gamblers are able to bet against the house when there is no immediate liquidity on the 'books' in the p2p game.
b) Somehow encouraging bettors to contribute to the liquidity of the books as opposed to "sniping" the pots, perhaps by having a 'maker' rebate similar to a derivatives trading platform if one contributes to the pot in the first half of the minute.
c) Have a better index, other than just Binance which can be manipulated easily. E.g. using the index of bitmex/deribit which is a weighted index of a lot of exchanges.
d) Have more currencies, e.g. ETH with less time. A lot of binary options offer 30 sec-1 minute game modes.

But overall, games are fast, snappy, and exceeded my expectations for sure. I love the community oriented aspect as well. Keep up the good work, I'll certainly be in touch with the site.

Just an amazing review! Thank you

Sometimes there were lag in the system and the odds displayed were somewhat skewed, e.g. when I bet 0.0001 BTC against 0.0001 BTC, the expected payout should have been 1.95x but the displayed odds were 1.45x for some odd reason. I still got 1.95x in a win, so it's probably just a frontend issue.

This is not a frontend issue. So I need to explain in more detail how the Betller odds work  Smiley
Expected payout odds include the amount you have entered. If you try to increase the bet amount and you will see the odds changes.

eg. in the active round 0.0001 vs 0.0001 bets, the odds considers your amount as well and decrease the value to 1.475X because your second bet will divide the potential win in half. (0.0001/0.0002)*0.95+1=1.475
This is the key difference from Expected payout odds and Payout (final odds) at history

Thank you for all (a b  c d) ideas!

hero member
Activity: 1666
Merit: 753
I've placed around 20 or so bets on the platform, everything went smoothly, there were no major hiccups.

Sometimes there were lag in the system and the odds displayed were somewhat skewed, e.g. when I bet 0.0001 BTC against 0.0001 BTC, the expected payout should have been 1.95x but the displayed odds were 1.45x for some odd reason. I still got 1.95x in a win, so it's probably just a frontend issue.

I'm very impressed in terms of the quickness of the withdrawal and the responsiveness of the team members, at least on the forum. I did manage to turn my 0.0003 BTC to 0.0013 BTC before withdrawing, which probably can be attributed to beginners luck  Cheesy

My suggestions would be as follows:
a) Have some sort of house game to ensure that gamblers are able to bet against the house when there is no immediate liquidity on the 'books' in the p2p game.
b) Somehow encouraging bettors to contribute to the liquidity of the books as opposed to "sniping" the pots, perhaps by having a 'maker' rebate similar to a derivatives trading platform if one contributes to the pot in the first half of the minute.
c) Have a better index, other than just Binance which can be manipulated easily. E.g. using the index of bitmex/deribit which is a weighted index of a lot of exchanges.
d) Have more currencies, e.g. ETH with less time. A lot of binary options offer 30 sec-1 minute game modes.

But overall, games are fast, snappy, and exceeded my expectations for sure. I love the community oriented aspect as well. Keep up the good work, I'll certainly be in touch with the site.
member
Activity: 143
Merit: 13
but lack of users makes it difficult to find someone on the other side of the bet everytime.
I think this isn't very big issue for new platform. It would take time to introduce their platform to gamblers since its totally new. That's only one disadvantage for peer to peer betting platform.
I think so When I was playing at their peer to peer platform I was on the time that many players are active that time, I think it is the time where many players who got from their sign up bonus is playing, After some time I stop on playing and decide to play after I got a rest, Players are showed online but there are aren't not many people playing so the rounds tend to decline each time. I think it is the main issue for me. This kind of gambling site needs to have better traffic from players to avoid decline in rounds continuously that avoids people to play in this kind of system.

For me this idea is good, p2p battle is what I enjoyed most, I think administrators need more promotions or some kind of campaign to promote this gambling site here and attract more people in playing.

By the way, I got my withdrawal request received on my wallet and proving that they are paying from the sign-up bonus that they are giving away.



Thank you for the constructive comment!
BT signature company coming soon.
Better promo - more players - more active rounds, you are right!
We are currently looking for Telegram, Twitter and YouTube marketing promo

Yes, I do agree that you need to be aggressive in the marketing aspect as it might help in attracting potential players on your platform. If you can hire a reputable sig campaign manager also that would be great. Because if you will hire a reputable one, it will add credibility to your betting platform. p2p betting is a tough one, so you need to look for contingency plans in sustaining the interest of players.

Give us some time, we have many ideas  Smiley
full member
Activity: 1904
Merit: 138
★Bitvest.io★ Play Plinko or Invest!
but lack of users makes it difficult to find someone on the other side of the bet everytime.
I think this isn't very big issue for new platform. It would take time to introduce their platform to gamblers since its totally new. That's only one disadvantage for peer to peer betting platform.
I think so When I was playing at their peer to peer platform I was on the time that many players are active that time, I think it is the time where many players who got from their sign up bonus is playing, After some time I stop on playing and decide to play after I got a rest, Players are showed online but there are aren't not many people playing so the rounds tend to decline each time. I think it is the main issue for me. This kind of gambling site needs to have better traffic from players to avoid decline in rounds continuously that avoids people to play in this kind of system.

For me this idea is good, p2p battle is what I enjoyed most, I think administrators need more promotions or some kind of campaign to promote this gambling site here and attract more people in playing.

By the way, I got my withdrawal request received on my wallet and proving that they are paying from the sign-up bonus that they are giving away.



Thank you for the constructive comment!
BT signature company coming soon.
Better promo - more players - more active rounds, you are right!
We are currently looking for Telegram, Twitter and YouTube marketing promo

Yes, I do agree that you need to be aggressive in the marketing aspect as it might help in attracting potential players on your platform. If you can hire a reputable sig campaign manager also that would be great. Because if you will hire a reputable one, it will add credibility to your betting platform. p2p betting is a tough one, so you need to look for contingency plans in sustaining the interest of players.
member
Activity: 143
Merit: 13
but lack of users makes it difficult to find someone on the other side of the bet everytime.
I think this isn't very big issue for new platform. It would take time to introduce their platform to gamblers since its totally new. That's only one disadvantage for peer to peer betting platform.
I think so When I was playing at their peer to peer platform I was on the time that many players are active that time, I think it is the time where many players who got from their sign up bonus is playing, After some time I stop on playing and decide to play after I got a rest, Players are showed online but there are aren't not many people playing so the rounds tend to decline each time. I think it is the main issue for me. This kind of gambling site needs to have better traffic from players to avoid decline in rounds continuously that avoids people to play in this kind of system.

For me this idea is good, p2p battle is what I enjoyed most, I think administrators need more promotions or some kind of campaign to promote this gambling site here and attract more people in playing.

By the way, I got my withdrawal request received on my wallet and proving that they are paying from the sign-up bonus that they are giving away.



Thank you for the constructive comment!
BT signature company coming soon.
Better promo - more players - more active rounds, you are right!
We are currently looking for Telegram, Twitter and YouTube marketing promo
legendary
Activity: 2492
Merit: 1145
Enterapp Pre-Sale Live - bit.ly/3UrMCWI
but lack of users makes it difficult to find someone on the other side of the bet everytime.
I think this isn't very big issue for new platform. It would take time to introduce their platform to gamblers since its totally new. That's only one disadvantage for peer to peer betting platform.
I think so When I was playing at their peer to peer platform I was on the time that many players are active that time, I think it is the time where many players who got from their sign up bonus is playing, After some time I stop on playing and decide to play after I got a rest, Players are showed online but there are aren't not many people playing so the rounds tend to decline each time. I think it is the main issue for me. This kind of gambling site needs to have better traffic from players to avoid decline in rounds continuously that avoids people to play in this kind of system.

For me this idea is good, p2p battle is what I enjoyed most, I think administrators need more promotions or some kind of campaign to promote this gambling site here and attract more people in playing.

By the way, I got my withdrawal request received on my wallet and proving that they are paying from the sign-up bonus that they are giving away.

legendary
Activity: 2408
Merit: 2226
Signature space for rent
but lack of users makes it difficult to find someone on the other side of the bet everytime.
I think this isn't very big issue for new platform. It would take time to introduce their platform to gamblers since its totally new. That's only one disadvantage for peer to peer betting platform. Also there is matter of time zone, worldwide gamblers won't active at once. However, I think it will solved within month or more. When more and more gamblers will registered there someone always will be other end. Anyway, platform seems good to me. Let's see react of gamblers.
jr. member
Activity: 191
Merit: 7
Good site, easy to use, but lack of users makes it difficult to find someone on the other side of the bet everytime.
legendary
Activity: 3066
Merit: 1312
In order to increase user base, you should start with deposit bonus rather than running a wagering contest. I was going through the contest and bonus page and was not happy with it. To attract new user you have to offer something from your pocket first. Your competitors are doing it why can't you?
Wagering is good to but I agree about the site having a deposit bonus when you deposit an amount of btc. As far as I am concern, there are lots of crypto websites that give deposit bonus to players. Players will have more btc to wage in your website which it's also a good start for players and the site.
I would prefer wagering instead of deposit bonus but the wagering contest should be more attractive than what they have now. On other side, deposit bonus is not a good offer because most deposit bonus requires a huge wagering requirement. Would you both take deposit bonus with high wagering requirement? Having more btc to wager as a reason to like deposit bonus does not make senses for me unless there is no wagering requirement behind the bonus (at least low wagering requirement).
I think both are good it's just how we can use them well. If you choose a Deposit bonus that means you have to complete the wagering requirements and can be withdrawn. And if you choose to take part in a wagering contest it means you also have to compete with the players there. Both have advantages and difficulties so how can you make good use of it. But why not try both?

Both are indeed good for the site, but I'm talking in the side as a player. I would never tried deposit bonus if the wagering requirement is too high, no matter if there is an advantage like what you think but for me deposit bonus is something that makes player get more -EV compared wagering contest.
In wagering contest, player can stop anytime they want especially if players are getting profit already. It does not apply with deposit bonus where we cant stop anytime as we have to complete the wagering requirement in order to withdraw money.
copper member
Activity: 1204
Merit: 737
✅ Need Campaign Manager? TG > @TalkStar675
Welcome to bitcointalk. I have checked your website and its looking good to me. Specially mobile version and colour combination is nice. Although forum users isn't well notified about your service. Hope that will be enough professional which is really necessary to run a betting platform. After visiting your telegram channel link i just found little amount of user there and its quite common for a new startup. Most probably you have marketting plans and after implementing that you maybe be able to get players on your platform.

Pages:
Jump to: