Topic: Between EOS and NEO - page 4. (Read 585 times)
NEO is better in my honest opinion. EOS has manage to come up with a platform that's not user friendly. You have your tokens staked up against your wish. For an ICO that lasted almost a year or more, we expected better and that they hit the ground running, but all we've gotten are bugs and failures.
To bad people still call EOS a scam.
These are the type of people buying ETH at ath and are afraid EOS will rupture there bubble, where they live in since january.
All three are good projects, both with succeses and flaws, are they overvalued? Could be! Is 4 bill alot for an ICO? Could be, but its not EOS who asked for it, its what everyone payed for it, depending on the demand on that date of buying.
Same for eth, is it worth 500 or 1000? I dont think so, what can i do for 500dollar with eth? Make some kitty or such? Same for eos and neo btw. True value of a crypto platform will rely on mass adoption, then you know. Greetings
These are the type of people buying ETH at ath and are afraid EOS will rupture there bubble, where they live in since january.
All three are good projects, both with succeses and flaws, are they overvalued? Could be! Is 4 bill alot for an ICO? Could be, but its not EOS who asked for it, its what everyone payed for it, depending on the demand on that date of buying.
Same for eth, is it worth 500 or 1000? I dont think so, what can i do for 500dollar with eth? Make some kitty or such? Same for eos and neo btw. True value of a crypto platform will rely on mass adoption, then you know. Greetings
I keep wondering what could be any body's conclusion on this two coins? NEO brings to the table a new consensus algorithm called Delegated Byzantine fank tolerance. Which is better?
i choose eos.
its platform and projects are much better than neo. and it gives more hope for future.
I keep wondering what could be any body's conclusion on this two coins? NEO brings to the table a new consensus algorithm called Delegated Byzantine fank tolerance. Which is better?
I'd pick NEO every day if only for the simple fact that they don't seem to be money-grubbing scammers.
The EOS team has collected $4 BILLION worth of funding but their launch has been nothing but plagued with issues and problems. There is no real reason why they needed the $4 billion and they have no concrete plans on why and how they plan to use it.
NEO is a good platform and if you notice the tokens on the platform of NEO are good projects and quality. Although the new altcoin has emerged since 2017, NEO has proven its worth and is well received by the community.
NEO community is very big and has been developing strongly in recent times. I believe that NEO's foundation can contribute to the construction of new ICO projects as almost all ICO projects using this platform attract large investors and can earn very good profits when listed on major exchanges. At present NEO prices are very cheap you can buy or invest in NEO's ICO projects Given that EOS is a centralized scam, and you can have your coins seized and transactions reversed at any time and for any reason without having any say in the matter, I would say pretty much any other coin is better.
Is this true? lmao EOS is that bad.
I keep wondering what could be any body's conclusion on this two coins? NEO brings to the table a new consensus algorithm called Delegated Byzantine fank tolerance. Which is better?
Both are very potent and powerful altcoins. I think you should invest in both altans. Profit will double and I think the EOS will bring more profit. Because the price of EOS will soon return to $ 18-20 in Q4 this year. without hesitation my preference go to eos , eos can rapidly become the second crypto volume and bypass ethereum soon.
Buy both instead one.
without hesitation my preference go to eos , eos can rapidly become the second crypto volume and bypass ethereum soon.
NEO is a good platform and if you notice the tokens on the platform of NEO are good projects and quality. Although the new altcoin has emerged since 2017, NEO has proven its worth and is well received by the community.
neo is certainly better for longer runs, but both will do well mate
Given that EOS is a centralized scam, and you can have your coins seized and transactions reversed at any time and for any reason without having any say in the matter, I would say pretty much any other coin is better.
Is this true? lmao EOS is that bad.
I keep wondering what could be any body's conclusion on this two coins? NEO brings to the table a new consensus algorithm called Delegated Byzantine fank tolerance. Which is better?
two coins have bright future prospects, NEO and EOS have advanced technology and now these two coins are getting popular if I am required to choose one I will choose NEO, NEO is called a lot of Ethereum people from China so I'm sure the future of NEO will be bright like Ethereum
I keep wondering what could be any body's conclusion on this two coins? NEO brings to the table a new consensus algorithm called Delegated Byzantine fank tolerance. Which is better?
I believe EOS is following the footstep of Ethereum but new consensus implemented by NEO is good but also come huge risk if the people in the system don't trust each other i.e If 66% of the other nodes disagree with the information/transaction then consensus cannot be achieve. I keep wondering what could be any body's conclusion on this two coins? NEO brings to the table a new consensus algorithm called Delegated Byzantine fank tolerance. Which is better?
I think both eos and neo can rise again and reach good values in the future. But for me, NEO is a coin which is more reliable and promising than EOS. Because I think NEO has many good features.
There is no even distribution for EOS, the majority of coins is held by a handful of people. For this reason i would stay away as it is not worth the risk, NEO is a much better investment and a more usable platform for ICOs
I will pick NEO to EOS but who knows with time EOS can do better in the Blockchain industry
Given that EOS is a centralized scam, and you can have your coins seized and transactions reversed at any time and for any reason without having any say in the matter, I would say pretty much any other coin is better.
I agree with you, EOS still struggling in their launching debut, there are problems that still unsolve, so forget it and focus to NEO which has a potential to make a surprise in the long run.
EOS uses delegrated proof of stake consensus algorithms which gives more power to the arbitrators in their governance system, this created unfair condition for the small EOS holders and makes whole EOS governance centralized. Where as NEO bringing new consensus algorithm in their governance body called delegated byzantine fault tolerance(dBFT) which gives opportunity for small players to vote if they found some validators are not fair which makes win-win situations for all and make their governance more decentralised and gives power for all. You can find more info here https://steemit.com/neo/@basiccrypto/neo-s-consensus-protocol-how-delegated-byzantine-fault-tolerance-works
I keep wondering what could be any body's conclusion on this two coins? NEO brings to the table a new consensus algorithm called Delegated Byzantine fank tolerance. Which is better?
I would pick neo, for me this project has more chances to give us profits in future, i believed in neo when it was very cheap and i believe now, so if this coin will make some pumps it will be nice hit for every investor who give some trust in it. Jump to: