Pages:
Author

Topic: BFL buyers - Damned if you do, Damned if you don't? (Read 2442 times)

hero member
Activity: 924
Merit: 1000
Or just damned?
sr. member
Activity: 434
Merit: 250
Correct. guess on the # of orders, also that spreadsheet thats out that has people orders. Not entirely accurate since people haven't addded themselves(or removed themselves).
hero member
Activity: 532
Merit: 500
How does anyone know the hashrate?

I emailed Butterfly a couple of weeks back and was given the following response:

I apologize. We do not share the number of TH that has been sold.

So I anything else is a best guesstimate, is it not?
sr. member
Activity: 434
Merit: 250
The network hashrate hasn't gone up anywhere near what most people thought. GPU mining is still proftiable; of course BFL rig mining will be profitable; they'll get the hardware and mine with it!

Thats only because asics are delayed. They calculated in all the hash * orders.
420
hero member
Activity: 756
Merit: 500
The network hashrate hasn't gone up anywhere near what most people thought. GPU mining is still proftiable; of course BFL rig mining will be profitable; they'll get the hardware and mine with it!
legendary
Activity: 1450
Merit: 1013
Cryptanalyst castrated by his government, 1952
Not really, they can just cancel their order and go on with life.  Nobody is forcing them to do anything.  Of course its risky....

I like your attitude.

Life goes on, for most of us, no matter what... until it doesn't.

Noisy thread.
full member
Activity: 224
Merit: 100
Yup, this has nothing to do with anybody being damned. Those who stay in are choosing to ride the speculation wave on their investment. Those who don't are choosing to cut their losses. Pre-orders are always a speculative buy.

The idea of "Sunk Cost" in game theory is the only thing that fools people into thinking they're damned if they don't. They've got a lot of emotional investment, but they'll walk away with exactly the same amount of money they invested, if they chose to walk away.

If they chose to stay, they're still riding the speculation wave. Whether they win on it is another matter. And many people will continue to play the "what if" game, whether they choose to stick it out, or not.

No matter what people decide, some of them will be kicking themselves, and others will be patting themselves on the back...
There is no "cut their losses".  Maybe "cut their opportunity costs".  But everyone gets a full refund, so no losses...

I thought I clarified that as saying that the only "losses" are emotional ones. But yes, that's the point I was trying to make.
legendary
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1005
Yup, this has nothing to do with anybody being damned. Those who stay in are choosing to ride the speculation wave on their investment. Those who don't are choosing to cut their losses. Pre-orders are always a speculative buy.

The idea of "Sunk Cost" in game theory is the only thing that fools people into thinking they're damned if they don't. They've got a lot of emotional investment, but they'll walk away with exactly the same amount of money they invested, if they chose to walk away.

If they chose to stay, they're still riding the speculation wave. Whether they win on it is another matter. And many people will continue to play the "what if" game, whether they choose to stick it out, or not.

No matter what people decide, some of them will be kicking themselves, and others will be patting themselves on the back...
There is no "cut their losses".  Maybe "cut their opportunity costs".  But everyone gets a full refund, so no losses...
full member
Activity: 224
Merit: 100
Yup, this has nothing to do with anybody being damned. Those who stay in are choosing to ride the speculation wave on their investment. Those who don't are choosing to cut their losses. Pre-orders are always a speculative buy.

The idea of "Sunk Cost" in game theory is the only thing that fools people into thinking they're damned if they don't. They've got a lot of emotional investment, but they'll walk away with exactly the same amount of money they invested, if they chose to walk away.

If they chose to stay, they're still riding the speculation wave. Whether they win on it is another matter. And many people will continue to play the "what if" game, whether they choose to stick it out, or not.

No matter what people decide, some of them will be kicking themselves, and others will be patting themselves on the back...
hero member
Activity: 1484
Merit: 500
Across The Universe
Waiting?  You act like its waiting in a line...  It should have physically taken you no longer than 20mins to place your order and cancel it. 

Geez, talk about first world problems....
There is currently a waiting time of 2 weeks for email responses and therefore....for refunds.

Or more last time i need 4 Weeks to Clearify a simple Question ...
Which Payment date i got ?
The answer was #20** Number ( Payed via Bitinstant )
legendary
Activity: 1890
Merit: 1003
Waiting?  You act like its waiting in a line...  It should have physically taken you no longer than 20mins to place your order and cancel it. 

Geez, talk about first world problems....
There is currently a waiting time of 2 weeks for email responses and therefore....for refunds.
legendary
Activity: 1890
Merit: 1003
I've been thinking about this conundrum for a while now... here's my thoughts.

For those of you who have been patiently waiting for BFL to actually start shipping in anything that would resemble 'decent' numbers I feel bad for you. Because you are stuck in a pretty tight situation.

1. If you wait for your unit, it could still be a while -- and once you get it, the network difficulty is going to shoot up something fierce. So, you may be thinking... I want to unload my unit before that happens.

2. If you unload our unit before you get it, its still a pre-order and as such is going to get a pre-order price and everyone is skeptical about BFL right now... thus the price isn't going to be high.

3. If you wait until you receive the unit, the market will be flooded with units in hand that others are selling which will hammer down the price. If you decide not to sell it, your in situation #1 -- the difficulty making 5 GH/S or 60 GH/S not mine like what was expected.

Tough spot man Sad
Here is what you do,

You have a  BFL pre-order. Hopefully for a Jally or Single or something. Check? Good.

1) Sell it on Ebay, for 60k, the prices over there are crazy for Mining devices.

With that money, if it's not held by Paypal. You are responsible and on the hook for delivery instead of BFL. Great.

2) When they fail to deliver your order, simply panic and refund 60K as well as have your Paypal card revoked. Sucks right?

3) Sell a non-existent pre-order on "a wing and a prayer" and get your customer to pay you in BTC. That way you can join in on the "scam" of (yet to be built) Pre-Orders.

You will be like a BFL Mini-me.

Sounds great right?

---------------------------

Alot of people in the near future are going to lose either:

A) Their Paypal Privileges and cards/Accounts.

B) Their shirts and shoes when they spend that money initially and have to then give it back because they couldn't take delivery.

C) Turn into BTC black holes as people demand their money back when the deliveries aren't shipped on time.

D) Immigrate to Jamaica or Cuba.
sr. member
Activity: 434
Merit: 250

Avalon is sending out 1200 units and 490.000 chips, am i correct? That would come to somewhere around 240th/s if about 80% of the units are 85gh/s ones...

Hm, might work. We could also consider a quintupling of hash rate. Still profitable... still way more than 10% on an investment in twelve months...

Keep going. Avalon is still taking orders for chips. Asicminer will be building more blades. BFL will start shipping in volume. If you believe BFL (why would you order if you didn't?), they can ship 300 TH/s in a single month.

Very hard to say whats profitable since no one can forecast the exchange rate. Hash rate i think is contingent on exchange rate. If btc drops to $2, still think there's a quintuple in hash rate?  there's some correlation there. Forgot who posted it , but saw someone else chart this.

Sure is. But when there are a lot of units doing 5GH at 40W, and those units have no other function, I don't see them beeing turned off.
With a difficulty of 300 millions and a BTC price of 2USD, they still make a produce more money than the cost of the electricity they consume.

Not to mention that you can sell the unit to someone who think the price might rise to $4, $10 or even (gasp) $15.

Right but barely profitable at that point, the opportunity cost of money better spent on anything else(bonds and eww- bank interest). People would stop ading more asics, unless they are thinking like amazon.com make up the low profit margin with HUGE volume. So hash rate would stop rising inversely to btc price.
full member
Activity: 224
Merit: 100
One bitcoin to rule them all!

Avalon is sending out 1200 units and 490.000 chips, am i correct? That would come to somewhere around 240th/s if about 80% of the units are 85gh/s ones...

Hm, might work. We could also consider a quintupling of hash rate. Still profitable... still way more than 10% on an investment in twelve months...

Keep going. Avalon is still taking orders for chips. Asicminer will be building more blades. BFL will start shipping in volume. If you believe BFL (why would you order if you didn't?), they can ship 300 TH/s in a single month.

Very hard to say whats profitable since no one can forecast the exchange rate. Hash rate i think is contingent on exchange rate. If btc drops to $2, still think there's a quintuple in hash rate?  there's some correlation there. Forgot who posted it , but saw someone else chart this.

Sure is. But when there are a lot of units doing 5GH at 40W, and those units have no other function, I don't see them beeing turned off.
With a difficulty of 300 millions and a BTC price of 2USD, they still make a produce more money than the cost of the electricity they consume.

Not to mention that you can sell the unit to someone who think the price might rise to $4, $10 or even (gasp) $15.
full member
Activity: 224
Merit: 100

Avalon is sending out 1200 units and 490.000 chips, am i correct? That would come to somewhere around 240th/s if about 80% of the units are 85gh/s ones...

Hm, might work. We could also consider a quintupling of hash rate. Still profitable... still way more than 10% on an investment in twelve months...

Keep going. Avalon is still taking orders for chips. Asicminer will be building more blades. BFL will start shipping in volume. If you believe BFL (why would you order if you didn't?), they can ship 300 TH/s in a single month.

Very hard to say whats profitable since no one can forecast the exchange rate. Hash rate i think is contingent on exchange rate. If btc drops to $2, still think there's a quintuple in hash rate?  there's some correlation there. Forgot who posted it , but saw someone else chart this.

I'd be actually quite interested in historical market data and difficulty data.

I'd love to do some analysis on it after i am finished with my current research project.
Taking all the cryptocoins and running statistics on them like crazy might be interesting.

Not too worthwhile, but enough to see what is going on.

But if it drops to $2, we will see one thing especially: ASICs sales on ebay. I know i will be buying...
sr. member
Activity: 434
Merit: 250

Avalon is sending out 1200 units and 490.000 chips, am i correct? That would come to somewhere around 240th/s if about 80% of the units are 85gh/s ones...

Hm, might work. We could also consider a quintupling of hash rate. Still profitable... still way more than 10% on an investment in twelve months...

Keep going. Avalon is still taking orders for chips. Asicminer will be building more blades. BFL will start shipping in volume. If you believe BFL (why would you order if you didn't?), they can ship 300 TH/s in a single month.

Very hard to say whats profitable since no one can forecast the exchange rate. Hash rate i think is contingent on exchange rate. If btc drops to $2, still think there's a quintuple in hash rate?  there's some correlation there. Forgot who posted it , but saw someone else chart this.
legendary
Activity: 3878
Merit: 1193

Avalon is sending out 1200 units and 490.000 chips, am i correct? That would come to somewhere around 240th/s if about 80% of the units are 85gh/s ones...

Hm, might work. We could also consider a quintupling of hash rate. Still profitable... still way more than 10% on an investment in twelve months...

Keep going. Avalon is still taking orders for chips. Asicminer will be building more blades. BFL will start shipping in volume. If you believe BFL (why would you order if you didn't?), they can ship 300 TH/s in a single month.
full member
Activity: 224
Merit: 100

Lets say I buy it and it comes really late. Fuck, the hash rate in the network has gone to 320TH/s. my god, it sucks.

The network is going to be way higher than that. Avalon alone will bring that much power online in the next few months.

Avalon is sending out 1200 units and 490.000 chips, am i correct? That would come to somewhere around 240th/s if about 80% of the units are 85gh/s ones...

Hm, might work. We could also consider a quintupling of hash rate. Still profitable... still way more than 10% on an investment in twelve months...

legendary
Activity: 3878
Merit: 1193

Lets say I buy it and it comes really late. Fuck, the hash rate in the network has gone to 320TH/s. my god, it sucks.

The network is going to be way higher than that. Avalon alone will bring that much power online in the next few months.
legendary
Activity: 1190
Merit: 1000
Let us consider what might happen.

I invest 2499 dollars into BFL. The best investment i COULD put it in would promise me increases of 10% if i tie it down for at least 5 years (buying a windmill rig).

Lets say I buy it and it comes really late. Fuck, the hash rate in the network has gone to 320TH/s. my god, it sucks.

Now, lets say we take it that we have 40 million as a result of the quadrupling in hash rate. After twelve months, considering that per year, the investment looses 60% of its value in profitability...

That would be 11k dollars in the first year on this. That is a 400% ROI within twelve months. At todays price AFTER the crash.


So no one is damned. The only worst case scenario is BFL being bankrupt. Anything else, I want to answer with "Bitches, please, get back to the real world."


Some of the risks that you ignore with ASIC mining:

When you quote returns in dollars, you imply a stable BTC to USD exchange rate. That is masking one of the largest risk factors in mining BTC which would be a collapse in the exchange rate.

Also, people may not be using Bitcoin 1.0 at some point in the future but some alternate virtual currency (perhaps Bitcoin 2.0) that solved unforeseen issues that cropped up and rendered Bitcoin obsolete. This new currency may not be compatible with current ASICs.

Bitcoin mining is a zero sum game. A new competitor that enters the mining hardware market with a 5-10x improvement in price/performance would render existing ASIC hardware (which is really first generation stuff and can be improved upon) as obsolete as GPUs are now.

More entrants with first generation ASIC hardware flood the market and the Bitcoin network hashrate spikes even higher. This in combination with a short term exchange rate crash could render large rigs unprofitable for an extended period.

ASIC hardware could have a short operational lifetime due to hardware failures. A MTBF of 500 hours would crush everyone's anticipated returns.

If you bought a windmill rig, you could rely on long term contracts with your local utility. It is also a reasonable assumption that people will still be using electricity over the next 2 years. Windmills are designed and manufactured by firms with lots of experience and mature product lines (like GE), so we can rely on them to operate for extended periods of time. Thus buying a windmill rig is much less risky that mining Bitcoins, and it's return reflects this.
Pages:
Jump to: