Author

Topic: BiblePay | 10% to Orphan-Charity | RANDOMX MINING | Sanctuaries (Masternodes) - page 585. (Read 243376 times)

full member
Activity: 1260
Merit: 115
So the way Masternodes.Pro calculates annual ROI (Return On Investment) is:

"To get the annual ROI we sum the 24 hours rewards multiply that by 365 then divide that product by the amount of coin required and multiply that by 100 to get the percentage.
We're just doing getblockhash then get block with that hash and taking the information given to us by that to get the txids and such to get all this information."

And I guess first txid in the getblock tx list is always the new coin generation transaction?, and then they probably use gettxout txid 0 and gettxout txid 1 to get the values?

I noticed last budget that our monthly budget pumped our ROI up by 4x for 24 hours, so I think they added code to start ignoring incorrect masternode reward for superblock from getgovernanceinfo, and with the new daily research superblock, I believe this also would pump up our ROI, and I think they might start ignoring incorrect masternode reward for the superblock from exec getboincinfo

Which leads just regular blocks left, which I believe 90% is Masternode Reward and 10% is Proof of Work reward, is this correct?

This is all very interesting, Im not sure our ROI has ever been totally correct on the masternode statistics sites
and Im not sure if my understanding is fully correct yet either
Im not sure if the way they are doing things works with superblocks involved
member
Activity: 489
Merit: 12
Alright everyone, as most of you know, our main websites visual appearance has been updated recently, but the content still need some work. I've been in contact with April, Togo and Thomas to ensure that our website can become something that we all can be proud of!

In order to do that, we could use the help of the community Smiley

April had the great idea that we should make a so called boilerplate: http://dkrcommunications.com/how-to-write-an-effective-boilerplate/

A boilerplate is basically a one-paragraph outline of what we are and what we do. It's a static chunk of information that will pop up in numerous places (mostly on the bottom): on our website, in newsletters, in press-releases, etc. It should give people the possibility to quickly be able to find out what we are about.

Thomas has created a whole new section on our forum called 'Website Enhancements & Suggestions', and I'd like to invite everyone who wants to, to help us write a catchy oneliner and boilerplate, so that we can really show the world what we are about.

http://forum.biblepay.org/index.php?board=8.0

Thanks Jaap for the forum PR about the 'Website Enhancements & Suggestions'!

http://forum.biblepay.org/index.php?board=8.0


full member
Activity: 1260
Merit: 115
can you made better proposal on pool? looks very mish-mash, that lines is horrible for knowing

columns with TriggerTime   FundedTime       Height  deletes and add description together in 1 line

7500000.0000   View Proposal   Charity   1  March 2018 Compassion.com Recurring Orphan Sponsorship Premiums  etc

Slovakia, add suggestion as Issue on Pool Github code page:  https://github.com/biblepay/BiblePayPool/issues >> New Issue
full member
Activity: 1260
Merit: 115
Just curious, can we make this any more complicated to mine this coin?  We went from extremely easy, to something that requires a ridiculous amount of time to understand.  Maybe we can add a couple of more acronyms, and steps that the average user is unwilling / unable to deal with.
Its pretty easy, maybe go for flubber coin?  
Won't win any awards for plain English however...
Our documentation is very good, and we are easier to understand than a BFL Labs ASIC, and of a higher calling, you just need a moderate IQ to understand the documentation.  This sets us apart, being a better breed for Christ.
Ah, and there we have it.  We went from talks of getting grandma to install a Biblepay wallet, to "We only want the mentally elite to apply."  The main point I am making is that this coin went from something I could walk people through in a matter of minutes; to the average person isn't going to bother.  That is really going to hurt a large scale adoption. 

Most future users of BiblePay will not be miners, future users will just use a desktop or mobile wallet to store and send coins

Interested to write better mining documentation ride22?

Distributed Computing:
http://wiki.biblepay.org/Distributed_Computing_Start_Guide
http://wiki.biblepay.org/Distributed_Computing

Togo Step Guide:
http://wiki.biblepay.org/Distributed_Computing_2

Lichtsucher Guide:
https://www.biblepay-central.org/en/mining-how-to/

The wiki is open to anyone to edit, just have to create an account, look forward to what you contribute.
MIP
newbie
Activity: 362
Merit: 0
Grandma doesn't care about mining.

What she needs is a mobile wallet and a decent exchange to convert the $$$ into BBP easily so she can tithe at the church.
full member
Activity: 462
Merit: 103
jaapgvk i know how to vote: but it looks bad : all melts together, descirption is under proposal  Huh

Rob already gave me access to the data behind the proposal lists of the pool. I will add a more stylish version with more graph to the next version of the Biblepay-Central site. Hope that will help.

It will help! Your work is very much appreciated, Lichtsucher! Smiley
full member
Activity: 574
Merit: 104
jaapgvk i know how to vote: but it looks bad : all melts together, descirption is under proposal  Huh

Oh okay Grin

I agree that the proposals could be separated a bit more clearly (maybe with an extra separation-line or something). And it shouldn't matter if you click on the black or gray part to get the vote command (or the pop-up shouldn't appear when you click on the black part).

But the most important thing to me is that it works.
jr. member
Activity: 219
Merit: 3
jaapgvk i know how to vote: but it looks bad : all melts together, descirption is under proposal  Huh

Rob already gave me access to the data behind the proposal lists of the pool. I will add a more stylish version with more graph to the next version of the Biblepay-Central site. Hope that will help.
full member
Activity: 770
Merit: 100
jaapgvk i know how to vote: but it looks bad : all melts together, descirption is under proposal  Huh
full member
Activity: 574
Merit: 104
ROB give here link for voting for IT ... im lost from web,forum,btctalk,pool,github,reddit .... we need max 2 webs for this .... ill go vote for IT and blockchain is right now  Wink

can you made better proposal on pool? looks very mish-mash, that lines is horrible for knowing

Code:
gobject vote-many 1399b99f1c28f6452e0f7a9aa852d84e3e265bbe745dab81772c236b60e2a77a funding yes


You can find it in the pool in 'governance > proposal list' (of course, you know this). But you need to right-click in the grey area of the proposal and select 'copy vote for proposal'.
full member
Activity: 770
Merit: 100
ROB give here link for voting for IT ... im lost from web,forum,btctalk,pool,github,reddit .... we need max 2 webs for this .... ill go vote for IT and blockchain is right now  Wink

can you made better proposal on pool? looks very mish-mash, that lines is horrible for knowing

columns with TriggerTime   FundedTime       Height  deletes and add description together in 1 line

7500000.0000   View Proposal   Charity   1  March 2018 Compassion.com Recurring Orphan Sponsorship Premiums  etc


voted yes for all things
full member
Activity: 462
Merit: 103
The blocks are now exactly 7 mins, 35094-35296 = 24 HR!  Thank God, all praise to Yeshua.

Thank you for your awesome coding work, Rob! What you do in a month an average developer does in a year!

I have voted Yes for IT expenses and I remind all sanctuary owners to vote for that proposal every month.
newbie
Activity: 491
Merit: 0
for me is better to wait, as i still have locked big buch of coins on c-cex... Smiley)
full member
Activity: 770
Merit: 100
7 days for voting is enough: how long being ELECTIONs less than 24 hours
full member
Activity: 364
Merit: 102
Thanks guys, it works for me. But before the balance reaches 50k, I have to update it manually?
Technically yes. I think Rob was looking at making things a bit more automatic but that is in the works.

However, right now to make full use of your RAC you need 500 BBP per magnitude. With your RAC where it is you won't need to change anything until the 1st of April (when we switch to another # of BBP per magnitude, or BBP per RAC).
newbie
Activity: 6
Merit: 0
Thanks guys, it works for me. But before the balance reaches 50k, I have to update it manually?
full member
Activity: 364
Merit: 102
capulo znfall we can switch next 1-2 days, why to wait for 1.april .... i see almost 40% all votes and ppl dont want voting

I think this is one of those situations where Rob cannot win!
If he waits until 1st April then people are upset that we have to wait so long.
If he changes early then people complain that he cut the vote short and accuse of removing democrazy.

Better to just stick with whatever date is set already, in my opinion.
full member
Activity: 364
Merit: 102
I don't have "utxoamount" in the config.
Ok then add
Code:
utxoamount=16900

Then in the debug console try doing

Code:
exec podcupdate true
newbie
Activity: 491
Merit: 0
I don't have "utxoamount" in the config.

if you not specified in config, then default is 50001, do you have at least this amount in wallet?
newbie
Activity: 491
Merit: 0
this error means that you dont have enough coins to stake (not staked coins), so if you have 50k coins and stake 20k coins, then if you change config to stake 50k it failes because you have only 30k not staked...
you need to wait for all coins will be again available, check exec stakebalance to see how many.. and then do podcupdate
it works for me in this way
Jump to: