Topic: Bidcent: A peer to peer blockchain game (Read 300 times)
A poor advertisement like this one will make the site become worst for many people, I also think this casino might be one of rug pull casino because that's what happen in most of new casino. It's better to create a well prepared ANN thread, it's not hard and expensive to do, maybe you need to spend for around $100-$200. Many people will not interested with this kind ANN.
So it means if someone will join it would be a nonstop bidding. I remember playing this with my friends but I don't think there's enough greedy people who will join in a game like this one, how many people can join or participate? Also, what is the betting coin Bitcoin, Ethereum? Also I think the website need a little bit improvement as currently I don't think the UI is that attractive.
Game has been revised.
Countdown is now just 5 minutes and min bid increased to 0.02.
This should minimise the probability of a long battle scenario.
Countdown is now just 5 minutes and min bid increased to 0.02.
This should minimise the probability of a long battle scenario.
Players can analyse the game results and see if there is any one with deep pockets before playing. When there are more players, this effect should be minimal as both sides should have players with deep pockets.
For players to be able to analyze the results of the game and see if anyone has deep pockets, this is pretty good in my opinion because players can adjust what to do.But if both parties have players with deep pockets, I disagree, friends, because in a game not all players will have more money and they won't necessarily make bets with quite a lot of money even though they do have that money.
It's better for a game that can really make all the players, not just players with deep pockets, so that gamblers with only a little capital still feel comfortable and aren't afraid of losing while playing.
Cases of loss of some tokens when connecting wallets to casinos do happen but if the casino is good it might not hurt to try connecting a secondary wallet filled with just a small amount and see if they have an edge or not.
Regarding the depth of balances in players' wallets, I disagree because this will create a feeling of insecurity and the assumption that this site is unfair because it is like expecting players with thick wallets.
If you're looking for anything like Stake or Duelbits, look elsewhere. It looks like a child learnt web design and ran wild with it, with no clever use of colour or other visual tricks. But hey, props for the hard work you obviously put into this. How much of a disadvantage does the house have in your "lovely" casino?
@coolcoinz You raised an interesting battle scenario where the players keep each other in battle for too long. This can be quite burdensome for some players to keep up with the battle. I will try to revise the game where battle time can be fastened. Thanks for the suggestion.
Decreasing the waiting time sounds like a good idea to prevent the above mentioned scenario from happening. However, you shouldn't decrease it too much to give players enough time to make a new bid.While working on this, I suggest also working on improving the website's design. tbh, it's a bit hard to figure out what each butoon is supposed to do even if you fully understand the concept of the game.
Basing up on the game concept then it would really be real battle on how deep is your pockets which means and i do agree that it is really that prone to manipulation on someone who does have that deep pocket.
Resetting the time to zero whenever there's a deposit then it would be a long time battle or making out that piling up the amount.Its true that this isnt the first time we do see this kind of idea on which
its true that most or all of them died along the way because they didnt really get any players on playing or making out that bet because they do really know on what are the tendencies or chances
that they can really be manipulated and ending up on non-fair way result which we dont really like for it to happen.
Resetting the time to zero whenever there's a deposit then it would be a long time battle or making out that piling up the amount.Its true that this isnt the first time we do see this kind of idea on which
its true that most or all of them died along the way because they didnt really get any players on playing or making out that bet because they do really know on what are the tendencies or chances
that they can really be manipulated and ending up on non-fair way result which we dont really like for it to happen.
It's also a battle of endurance. It says the game counter is 600 seconds, so 10 minutes for each new bid. Let's say your pockets are deep on both sides and you keep bidding, after 10 hours or so you'll both be exhausted. If one of you has an emergency at home, loses Internet connection, falls asleep, they lose. The bigger the stakes the more you'll have to lose and the more you'll be waiting for the last second to see if the opponent outbids you.
This could potentially escalate to something like a battle for a 1BTC stake where you both don't sleep for days not to give away that money, and at some point one of you gets a power outage and it's all over.
@coolcoinz You raised an interesting battle scenario where the players keep each other in battle for too long. This can be quite burdensome for some players to keep up with the battle. I will try to revise the game where battle time can be fastened. Thanks for the suggestion.
outlast for how many hours then the more serious that they shouldnt really be letting go with the rope because they do know on whats up stake in regarding on this one.Its true that once internet connection
has been cut off or the power line then it would be over.Its good that you would really be making off some revises or changes to make this not a long lasting type of game. There should be those
limitations considering that this game could really last up as much as possible because people would really be fighting for someone who do keeps on outbidding you first.
Basing up on the game concept then it would really be real battle on how deep is your pockets which means and i do agree that it is really that prone to manipulation on someone who does have that deep pocket.
Resetting the time to zero whenever there's a deposit then it would be a long time battle or making out that piling up the amount.Its true that this isnt the first time we do see this kind of idea on which
its true that most or all of them died along the way because they didnt really get any players on playing or making out that bet because they do really know on what are the tendencies or chances
that they can really be manipulated and ending up on non-fair way result which we dont really like for it to happen.
Resetting the time to zero whenever there's a deposit then it would be a long time battle or making out that piling up the amount.Its true that this isnt the first time we do see this kind of idea on which
its true that most or all of them died along the way because they didnt really get any players on playing or making out that bet because they do really know on what are the tendencies or chances
that they can really be manipulated and ending up on non-fair way result which we dont really like for it to happen.
It's also a battle of endurance. It says the game counter is 600 seconds, so 10 minutes for each new bid. Let's say your pockets are deep on both sides and you keep bidding, after 10 hours or so you'll both be exhausted. If one of you has an emergency at home, loses Internet connection, falls asleep, they lose. The bigger the stakes the more you'll have to lose and the more you'll be waiting for the last second to see if the opponent outbids you.
This could potentially escalate to something like a battle for a 1BTC stake where you both don't sleep for days not to give away that money, and at some point one of you gets a power outage and it's all over.
@coolcoinz You raised an interesting battle scenario where the players keep each other in battle for too long. This can be quite burdensome for some players to keep up with the battle. I will try to revise the game where battle time can be fastened. Thanks for the suggestion.
when I saw your game I didn't understand anything, when people create something that is aimed at customers, that something must be easy to use, and that includes being easy even for the most layman, the interface must be something very beautiful to attract people's attention, people like very beautiful things, with lots of colors and a good designer because that shows that the owner of the project put a lot of effort into creating the project to please the customers, and the method in which the owner of the project publicizes the project it's another big important factor, and you didn't do it right either, you didn't create a beautiful ann thread
after all these very important points that I mentioned, there is another important point, which are the deposit and withdrawal methods, if you create a cryptocurrency game, it is important that you put bitcoin as a deposit and withdrawal method, bitcoin is the largest cryptocurrency , you yourself are in a forum where bitcoin has the biggest community, but you come to show a site that only accepts altcoin, that doesn't make any sense, I think there's a lot missing to organize
after all these very important points that I mentioned, there is another important point, which are the deposit and withdrawal methods, if you create a cryptocurrency game, it is important that you put bitcoin as a deposit and withdrawal method, bitcoin is the largest cryptocurrency , you yourself are in a forum where bitcoin has the biggest community, but you come to show a site that only accepts altcoin, that doesn't make any sense, I think there's a lot missing to organize
First, you should move this topic to Alternate cryptocurrencies->Announcements (Altcoins) since bitcoin is not supported.
Second, although I appreciate your efforts to create 'an on-chain game to prevent manipulation, but as other members have said, the concept of the game itself gives advantage to players who have more money and the luck factor doesn't have much effect on the results. Correct me if am wrong, but doesn't this leave room for manipulation?
Second, although I appreciate your efforts to create 'an on-chain game to prevent manipulation, but as other members have said, the concept of the game itself gives advantage to players who have more money and the luck factor doesn't have much effect on the results. Correct me if am wrong, but doesn't this leave room for manipulation?
So... it's a battle of who's richer? I hardly doubt that's something interesting. It's not based on luck or skill, it's based on how much you can slap the other party with a thick stack of money instead, and really, the only party enjoying this is the winner. At least in other gambling games, like poker, losers would still somehow enjoy even the process. This might be better in a tournament format if OP wants to continue though, I don't think it's a game for a site really, unless timeframes for people to put their money in is like in days or weeks.
Even if they create video tutorials, it wont make any change imo. Also, I would not say it as a good initiative but it is a bad initiative because this game is a game that will be easily dominated by players with big bankroll. However I do not even think that players with big bankroll are interested to play this game. Sorry to say, this project gambling site will not alive for long time due to lack of interest.
It's tutorial is basically pressing some sort of button and giving the pot the money I reckon, nothing interesting or thinking happening. 
Players can analyse the game results and see if there is any one with deep pockets before playing. When there are more players, this effect should be minimal as both sides should have players with deep pockets.
For players to be able to analyze the results of the game and see if anyone has deep pockets, this is pretty good in my opinion because players can adjust what to do.But if both parties have players with deep pockets, I disagree, friends, because in a game not all players will have more money and they won't necessarily make bets with quite a lot of money even though they do have that money.
It's better for a game that can really make all the players, not just players with deep pockets, so that gamblers with only a little capital still feel comfortable and aren't afraid of losing while playing.
Players can analyse the game results and see if there is any one with deep pockets before playing. When there are more players, this effect should be minimal as both sides should have players with deep pockets.
For players to be able to analyze the results of the game and see if anyone has deep pockets, this is pretty good in my opinion because players can adjust what to do.But if both parties have players with deep pockets, I disagree, friends, because in a game not all players will have more money and they won't necessarily make bets with quite a lot of money even though they do have that money.
It's better for a game that can really make all the players, not just players with deep pockets, so that gamblers with only a little capital still feel comfortable and aren't afraid of losing while playing.
Good initiative to OP to come out of a game like this, based on what I'm reading on the majority of the post this is not the kind of game that the majority of the gambling community will support, what's your motivation for on launching game like this when there's already sites like this in the past that has failed to generate support in the support.
Maybe because the majority of the gambling community is not used to this kind of game.
To generate interest why not create video tutorials so people have an idea at a first glimpse of what the site is all about and how to play it.
Maybe because the majority of the gambling community is not used to this kind of game.
To generate interest why not create video tutorials so people have an idea at a first glimpse of what the site is all about and how to play it.
Even if they create video tutorials, it wont make any change imo. Also, I would not say it as a good initiative but it is a bad initiative because this game is a game that will be easily dominated by players with big bankroll. However I do not even think that players with big bankroll are interested to play this game. Sorry to say, this project gambling site will not alive for long time due to lack of interest.
The only thing that bothers me is .org because as far as I know, it is the domain for organizations. If anyone uses it for anything other than that, there will probably be a warning from the regulators. But let's hope it doesn't happen to you @OP.
The design takes a classic design that doesn't include pictures or anything else like in other casinos. Maybe you can provide more details if your thread is an ANN for your casino and my suggestion is to add more gambling games to catch people's attention. By only having one type of gambling game, it seems difficult to compete with other casinos.
The design takes a classic design that doesn't include pictures or anything else like in other casinos. Maybe you can provide more details if your thread is an ANN for your casino and my suggestion is to add more gambling games to catch people's attention. By only having one type of gambling game, it seems difficult to compete with other casinos.
I checked the site and it is a who has more token will win game since both party needs to outbid each other. The decentralized idea is cool, the pvp idea is great but the thought of only those who have more or deeper pocket will win suck.
I hope you can present more decentralized games that rely on either luck or skill and not only how deep their pocket is. Anywho, Welcome to the forum. It would be great if you heed some of the advice here that you create your service announcement and buy copper membership in order to publish graphical presentation in the forum.
I hope you can present more decentralized games that rely on either luck or skill and not only how deep their pocket is. Anywho, Welcome to the forum. It would be great if you heed some of the advice here that you create your service announcement and buy copper membership in order to publish graphical presentation in the forum.
Good initiative to OP to come out of a game like this, based on what I'm reading on the majority of the post this is not the kind of game that the majority of the gambling community will support, what's your motivation for on launching game like this when there's already sites like this in the past that has failed to generate support in the support.
Maybe because the majority of the gambling community is not used to this kind of game.
To generate interest why not create video tutorials so people have an idea at a first glimpse of what the site is all about and how to play it.
Maybe because the majority of the gambling community is not used to this kind of game.
To generate interest why not create video tutorials so people have an idea at a first glimpse of what the site is all about and how to play it.
Players can analyse the game results and see if there is any one with deep pockets before playing.
But for that to happen there has to be a decent number of games, am I right?
Since there isn't yet, some of us will have to be the lab rats that make the results others can later examine.
Who's willing to do that? Not me.
Quote
When there are more players, this effect should be minimal as both sides should have players with deep pockets.
In other words it's you saying: "you better have a lot of money if you want to play my game."
Don't expect a lot of traffic.
Fees are currently 0.3% for every bid. There is no fee for deposits and withdrawals.
Additionally, the details of how to play the game can be found in the docs with examples.
https://bidcent.org/docs/
Players can analyse the game results and see if there is any one with deep pockets before playing. When there are more players, this effect should be minimal as both sides should have players with deep pockets.
Additionally, the details of how to play the game can be found in the docs with examples.
https://bidcent.org/docs/
Players can analyse the game results and see if there is any one with deep pockets before playing. When there are more players, this effect should be minimal as both sides should have players with deep pockets.
Basing up on the game concept then it would really be real battle on how deep is your pockets which means and i do agree that it is really that prone to manipulation on someone who does have that deep pocket.
Resetting the time to zero whenever there's a deposit then it would be a long time battle or making out that piling up the amount.Its true that this isnt the first time we do see this kind of idea on which
its true that most or all of them died along the way because they didnt really get any players on playing or making out that bet because they do really know on what are the tendencies or chances
that they can really be manipulated and ending up on non-fair way result which we dont really like for it to happen.
Resetting the time to zero whenever there's a deposit then it would be a long time battle or making out that piling up the amount.Its true that this isnt the first time we do see this kind of idea on which
its true that most or all of them died along the way because they didnt really get any players on playing or making out that bet because they do really know on what are the tendencies or chances
that they can really be manipulated and ending up on non-fair way result which we dont really like for it to happen.
It's also a battle of endurance. It says the game counter is 600 seconds, so 10 minutes for each new bid. Let's say your pockets are deep on both sides and you keep bidding, after 10 hours or so you'll both be exhausted. If one of you has an emergency at home, loses Internet connection, falls asleep, they lose. The bigger the stakes the more you'll have to lose and the more you'll be waiting for the last second to see if the opponent outbids you.
This could potentially escalate to something like a battle for a 1BTC stake where you both don't sleep for days not to give away that money, and at some point one of you gets a power outage and it's all over.
Jump to: