It depends on how much money you have and what your risk tolerance is. Nobody should start gambling with money they can’t afford to lose, it doesn’t matter if it’s big capital with a small risk or small capital with a big risk. Responsible gambling is key, everybody with half a brain knows that.
Topic: Big capital, small risk or small capital big risk - which is best approach? - page 7. (Read 785 times)
September 12, 2023, 03:35:55 PM
September 12, 2023, 03:32:20 PM
It's the opposite for me. The lower the bankroll or capital you have, the lesser risk that you're taking.
Yeah, those that have huge capitals can stay to gamble for so long but do they afford to lose all of that? And that's why I think that having a smaller capital is what should be the lesser risk.
Since everyone is anticipating that they're going to lose then lose with small and affordable amount of yours. The principle of betting what you can afford to lose is what we always say because its risk is associated on how much we're willing to let go.
Yeah, those that have huge capitals can stay to gamble for so long but do they afford to lose all of that? And that's why I think that having a smaller capital is what should be the lesser risk.
Since everyone is anticipating that they're going to lose then lose with small and affordable amount of yours. The principle of betting what you can afford to lose is what we always say because its risk is associated on how much we're willing to let go.
September 12, 2023, 03:25:49 PM
Different people with different approach to gambling. Some prefer committing huge capital to high probability small odds while others prefer using small capital to target big wins. There are many reasons for each of these approaches.
While those that put huge capital win more often, their losses are usually painful. On the other hand, those that commit small capital to make huge wins rare win but when they do, they win big; their losses too are less painful. There are other advantages and disadvantages for both approaches but for the sake of this discussion, let's know which approach you think is better and why?
While those that put huge capital win more often, their losses are usually painful. On the other hand, those that commit small capital to make huge wins rare win but when they do, they win big; their losses too are less painful. There are other advantages and disadvantages for both approaches but for the sake of this discussion, let's know which approach you think is better and why?
Every gamblers had their own style of gambling,some ready to inverse huge by multiple bets.Then the profit percentage is also high and sure win for the multiple betting gamblers.Each game had the winning of 10x of the invest money.If the gambler win of 3-10 bets,then the winning percentage will be 30x for the 10x deposit.So the gambler will easily win of 20x of the profit from the betting.This multiple bet is almost the risky one.Some time their is no winnings or 1-2 win from the 10 betting.For this reason,many gamblers avoid of the multiple betting.The big winning people also from the multiple betting,So the choice is yours.Since the money deposited by yourself.
September 12, 2023, 03:18:46 PM
I think both options are good, but it still depends on which match you prefer.
I think there are times to use big bets for small odds and there are times to bet at big odds with small bets. It all depends on who is going to play the match so I am not as consistent as other people in my decisions. This means that analysis is required and bets must be placed on which team has the potential to win.
I think there are times to use big bets for small odds and there are times to bet at big odds with small bets. It all depends on who is going to play the match so I am not as consistent as other people in my decisions. This means that analysis is required and bets must be placed on which team has the potential to win.
September 12, 2023, 03:10:33 PM
To be honest, I’d prefer to bet using a few bucks and not a huge amount of money because it would feel so bad when you lose it all. I’d prefer to go with small capital all the time and see if my luck will be with me.
I really don’t wanna risk a lot of money on gambling as It’s something that you couldn’t control and you don’t even know if you could win or lose so it’s better to wager a bit of money but with high odds imo.
I really don’t wanna risk a lot of money on gambling as It’s something that you couldn’t control and you don’t even know if you could win or lose so it’s better to wager a bit of money but with high odds imo.
September 12, 2023, 03:07:06 PM
Different people with different approach to gambling. Some prefer committing huge capital to high probability small odds while others prefer using small capital to target big wins. There are many reasons for each of these approaches.
While those that put huge capital win more often, their losses are usually painful. On the other hand, those that commit small capital to make huge wins rare win but when they do, they win big; their losses too are less painful. There are other advantages and disadvantages for both approaches but for the sake of this discussion, let's know which approach you think is better and why?
I think I'll stay with small capital with big risk considering in the long run if you wager enough and hit the win you either win or be just at breakeven. The only downside in it is that if you make lot of bets and all ended in losses that considers a huge loss of capital. There's always a risk on both sides but that's just gambling. While those that put huge capital win more often, their losses are usually painful. On the other hand, those that commit small capital to make huge wins rare win but when they do, they win big; their losses too are less painful. There are other advantages and disadvantages for both approaches but for the sake of this discussion, let's know which approach you think is better and why?
September 12, 2023, 03:00:26 PM
I think there is no standard to what we can gamble with it just depends on the availability of funds with the gambler because if the gambler is having high funds he will definitely gamble with high money thinking that will reduce the risk also same thing goes with an average gambler who doesn't have much because he will tend to manage his funds and go with high risk because of the money he used.
September 12, 2023, 03:00:14 PM
I think small capital will always be the best way to pick for average people. We are not millionaire you know. I don't think this is easy comparison so. Its one side only in my opinion. Small capital, big risk games but higher amounts can help you to hit high. By trying more, you substantially increase your chances to win. I also love trying sports betting with very high odds so I would get very high returns.
September 12, 2023, 02:57:22 PM
~
Best Approach remains playing with an amount of money you can afford to lose, you decide if it is a big or small amount. And then If it is sports betting, I rather not pick too many games to bet on to accumulate odds, selecting a few games with good odds is good for me.While those that put huge capital win more often, their losses are usually painful. On the other hand, those that commit small capital to make huge wins rare win but when they do, they win big; their losses too are less painful.
This is your own assumption. It is not true. Asides that there is no correlation with the amount you use in gambling influencing how often you win, there is no way to really quantify the pain that the people who gamble with small and big money feel when they loose. For example, someone who gambles with a small amount of money, it most time mean that they do not have much, loosing that small amount of money that they have managed to spare for gambling can be as painful as loosing a big amount. September 12, 2023, 02:52:00 PM
Small capital as I don't have a stash of coins. You only have two options though when there should be more. Small-time gamblers are often just betting small amounts but could accumulate wins which is what I prefer to do.
If I try small capital to win big, it would be the sports parlay but I have never won any of it since the time I have been doing it. I stopped because it was much like a state-owned lottery. The chances of winning is like 1 in 500M.
September 12, 2023, 02:42:34 PM
Cashout is usually too expensive to use. If the game has started and the situation has not changed, then it is already worth 10-15% of the bet, and if things did not go in our favor, then immediately more than 50%. Sometimes it is easier to make a hedge bet, but this is also expensive. I prefer not to fuss and just see how it all ends (unexpected endings are common in sports).
Most of the time I don't use cash out either and the only time I consider cash out is when I select multiple bets and I see there is a high tendency of one of the clubs to lose out.
September 12, 2023, 02:37:09 PM
In my opinion, it’s better to have a small capital and a big risk, because if I risk a lot of capital for the sake of a 10% profit, success will not impress me. But if I win 1000% of the bet, then emotions make themselves felt. In addition, it is obvious that it is better to lose a small bet than a huge deposit. This is a kind of damage control.
If you check some football in-play, you will notice odds like 1.02 down to the ones I have mention above. With 1.02 odd, that is 0.02% profit and people going for that such odds are not wise at all because once they will lose, they lose in a way that will cause them depression and they will continue to lose money to gambling. 10% of profit is 1.1 odd and that is also still small. Just like I have said above, I prefer nothing less than 1.5 odd while gambling with bookmakers, while nothing less than 3 odds in casinos.Yes, I have good betting experience. I never make single bets on such low odds - there is no point in this (maybe except for the wager, but I am not distracted by such bonuses). I sometimes add low odds selections to my multi bets but even here I prefer a range of 1.3-1.7 and a total odds of 6 to 10. Such bets don’t always work out, but when they do, I get a lot of positive emotions.
Damage control can be very helpful in such situations and one of the most ignored damages control features that gamblers neglect some time is the cash out features, because even the smallest odds can still lose so since there is no guaranteed odds one need to be very smart enough to monitor the entire game process and being able to make decisions in-between, because that is what make the difference when you want to apply damage control not to lose the entire bet.
~
~
Cashout is usually too expensive to use. If the game has started and the situation has not changed, then it is already worth 10-15% of the bet, and if things did not go in our favor, then immediately more than 50%. Sometimes it is easier to make a hedge bet, but this is also expensive. I prefer not to fuss and just see how it all ends (unexpected endings are common in sports).
September 12, 2023, 02:25:38 PM
Different people with different approach to gambling. Some prefer committing huge capital to high probability small odds while others prefer using small capital to target big wins. There are many reasons for each of these approaches.
While those that put huge capital win more often, their losses are usually painful. On the other hand, those that commit small capital to make huge wins rare win but when they do, they win big; their losses too are less painful. There are other advantages and disadvantages for both approaches but for the sake of this discussion, let's know which approach you think is better and why?
While those that put huge capital win more often, their losses are usually painful. On the other hand, those that commit small capital to make huge wins rare win but when they do, they win big; their losses too are less painful. There are other advantages and disadvantages for both approaches but for the sake of this discussion, let's know which approach you think is better and why?
In my opinion, it’s better to have a small capital and a big risk, because if I risk a lot of capital for the sake of a 10% profit, success will not impress me. But if I win 1000% of the bet, then emotions make themselves felt. In addition, it is obvious that it is better to lose a small bet than a huge deposit. This is a kind of damage control.
Small deposit or big stake what matters is the luck, if you are lucky to have selected a few sure games that you know can give some substantial winning you ought to go for it, but also mind you, the more the game selected the higher you chances of losing because you can be sure in all the selections, definitely one or two games will cut the ticket and that is where making use of the cash-out feature could help significantly.
September 12, 2023, 02:25:33 PM
In my opinion, it’s better to have a small capital and a big risk, because if I risk a lot of capital for the sake of a 10% profit, success will not impress me. But if I win 1000% of the bet, then emotions make themselves felt. In addition, it is obvious that it is better to lose a small bet than a huge deposit. This is a kind of damage control.
If you check some football in-play, you will notice odds like 1.02 down to the ones I have mention above. With 1.02 odd, that is 0.02% profit and people going for that such odds are not wise at all because once they will lose, they lose in a way that will cause them depression and they will continue to lose money to gambling. 10% of profit is 1.1 odd and that is also still small. Just like I have said above, I prefer nothing less than 1.5 odd while gambling with bookmakers, while nothing less than 3 odds in casinos. September 12, 2023, 02:19:18 PM
Different people with different approach to gambling. Some prefer committing huge capital to high probability small odds while others prefer using small capital to target big wins. There are many reasons for each of these approaches.
While those that put huge capital win more often, their losses are usually painful. On the other hand, those that commit small capital to make huge wins rare win but when they do, they win big; their losses too are less painful. There are other advantages and disadvantages for both approaches but for the sake of this discussion, let's know which approach you think is better and why?
While those that put huge capital win more often, their losses are usually painful. On the other hand, those that commit small capital to make huge wins rare win but when they do, they win big; their losses too are less painful. There are other advantages and disadvantages for both approaches but for the sake of this discussion, let's know which approach you think is better and why?
In my opinion, it’s better to have a small capital and a big risk, because if I risk a lot of capital for the sake of a 10% profit, success will not impress me. But if I win 1000% of the bet, then emotions make themselves felt. In addition, it is obvious that it is better to lose a small bet than a huge deposit. This is a kind of damage control.
September 12, 2023, 02:15:48 PM
I was using huge amount of money on small odds before and I win often, but if I lose, I lose more and one loss can be up to 20 winnings. Using huge capital for small odds is not good.
Using small capital for huge winning is better. That is why I prefer casinos with games that gives me 3 odds or more. In sport, that kind of possibility makes the odd to significantly be reduced.
The smallest odds are on sport betting. There is no good reason to be going for 1.005, 1.01 or other low odds. When I prefer to go for better odds more than 1.5 odds in sport, it has been better than before. I bet less than before and I use low amount of money.
Using small capital for huge winning is better. That is why I prefer casinos with games that gives me 3 odds or more. In sport, that kind of possibility makes the odd to significantly be reduced.
The smallest odds are on sport betting. There is no good reason to be going for 1.005, 1.01 or other low odds. When I prefer to go for better odds more than 1.5 odds in sport, it has been better than before. I bet less than before and I use low amount of money.
September 12, 2023, 02:09:53 PM
Different people with different approach to gambling. Some prefer committing huge capital to high probability small odds while others prefer using small capital to target big wins. There are many reasons for each of these approaches.
While those that put huge capital win more often, their losses are usually painful. On the other hand, those that commit small capital to make huge wins rare win but when they do, they win big; their losses too are less painful. There are other advantages and disadvantages for both approaches but for the sake of this discussion, let's know which approach you think is better and why?
While those that put huge capital win more often, their losses are usually painful. On the other hand, those that commit small capital to make huge wins rare win but when they do, they win big; their losses too are less painful. There are other advantages and disadvantages for both approaches but for the sake of this discussion, let's know which approach you think is better and why?
Jump to: