To people replying to this post i intentionally ask the too not quote and talk about something else around something else and intentionally deepen the topic matter of evidence that stays around the topic, but actually I ask people to try to dig in the enormous masses of evidence related too Block 5035 --> 1Derby Accounts --> John Thomas --> Mad Hedge Trader --> NYSO --> Bitcoin Deposit through Investment by people that mainly invested in Mad Hedge Trader, Bitcoin Logo and John Thomas -> Ecstacy --> Pharmaceutical Companies --> S&P500 --> BTC Exhanges --> New York Wall Street --> Identity of John Thomas --> War Machines and all other possibilities of World Mass Destruction With Chemicals and Pollution Industry -- > Lobotomy of drug abusers --> Production of pharmaceutical too treat lobotomy or just maintain optional possibility too live as destroyed human normally With anti-psychotica and anti-depressiva at nearly high cost for all worlds countries.
Hi Dealazer - what you seem to point out above is a known and understood thing to some intelligent people on earth.
so this things matters less, to me , don't get me wrong, i care, its just we can forward project these things and see a predictable outcome.
what i want to specifically ask you is this :
are you alleging that in normal operation or in a certain 51% attack scenario, that block rewards can be changed retrospectively, while appearing the same on the block chain explorer - on this issue i'd like to specifically ask you.
the other issues are still very relevant - although most of Bitcoin talk member are probably employees of in-Q-tel so they see BTC kind of as "their project" now it seems, even a retard can see how the innovation got sucked out of it, the weird "religious" nature and vibe in which many a "BTC supporter" reacts .
the 1984 style in which edits and posts were changed.
so you see these armchair vikings don't believe in free markets or even in their own constitution, they are simply contractors that work for a "corporation" which ironically is a Fiat Bank. they are not here to help you and don't care about Cryptocurrency in most cases, they have no leaders and thus mostly have no faith or belief structures.
such a backwards system is just a few steps away from full communist style police state in which "meta data" and information becomes a "threat", these are all signs of very sick structures, centralized and decayed, but then with this there is also the will to enforce projects onto other people.
but unfortunately just as with Communism the results become very predictable - welcome to modern western reality.
the Question again :
are you alleging that in normal operation or in a certain 51% attack scenario, that block rewards can be changed retrospectively, while appearing the same on the block chain explorer - on this issue i'd like to specifically ask you.
I think he's trying tell us something else other than crypto lol , still trying to figure what he's upto though. Let me know if you crack the code.
I don't have to crack that code, it was cracked many years ago, and its falling apart in front of you.
I'd like to see if he answers my questions however.
Actually to says the Word retrospectively causes some problems too me, but as I can think is that even tho we face another convict too Bitcoin ask me this first Block of just bytes are the endless data of millions of satoshis while even a computer cannot actually create 25 coins as of Bitcoin into millions of data that are created in fraction of Seconds, even tho we can actually face an different belief that all data is just squash about just random figures that are based on time on how much processor is working on and figuring out the typical data of the most suspicious workflow of actually to believe in the time where robots might turn into Terminators while we actually reprocess the data so the Terminators actually can create movements and even imaginable data of information to even know how the reality is and move within it.
Actually thinking about just how this could had been done is hardly for me, but it's clearly not strings of SHA256 bytes we are creating it's more into this to believe, even tho I don't actually know.
What is most reasonable to think is that 10000 coins Block reward has too much bytes to even exist as megabytes in codes like it would be an gigabyte of codes or even more to just transfer the coin.
leaving the terminator robots aside for the moment ..are you suggesting a relationship between the Block reward and the block size in data that there could be a flaw?