Hi, yes that was a miscomunication, and I believe Krystelle had her own reason to use Public Figure pic as her profile picture. She is a professioal ICO marketing advisor, registered in several website such as ico bench, coin schedule, etc. I hope your opinion does not become accusation to us. We are registered company with legal entity and Lawyer team, we also currently working closely with Indonesia Goverment in certain area including drafting regulation for cryptocurrencies in Indonesia. So, pls consider before accusing.
1. So you don't verify Kristelle identity first? Seems like a very clever move coming from a company which would literally hold a lot of money. Anyway, who is this Kristelle then? I can't find any link or info about her identity (if she really exist).
Edit: is this her?
https://www.linkedin.com/in/krystelle-galano-15940610b.
2. Where did you register your company? Any proof of working with the Indonesian government and what does this kind of "working closely means"? They survey and ask your opinion?
If you want to know our credibility, pls find all our coverage news below, all of these news released during october 2018, when we first launched our Exchange to public.
Dude, when you don't know your advisor is using a fake picture, that pretty much shows your credibility.
Tbh I don't really care even if you've been covered in many publications. I know one or two ICO projects like Eunomia which is entirely bullshit but can run their ICO. If you want people to believe you, then do your job properly, give proof and don't use a lame excuse like "sorry this is a communication problem".
1. We verified her, we have legal agreement. We missed because that girl above looks identical with Krystelle face, especially she was using that picture as her profile picture in linkedin (you can google Krytelle Gallano and That girl on the same time and see they both have identical face structure). and yes thats her linkedin page, you can see Biido is one of her portfolios
2. Indonesia, you dont have to ask what kind of portfolio we are doing with the govement, but if you see closely we have regulator in our advisory Board, we are drafting regulation for cryptocurrency and crypto exchange in Indonesia, we meet with the Govement and Bank regulator in Indonesia. We are doing what we can to actually helping Crypto become Mainstream.
Thanks for your opinion, but accusing our project is a scam based on one small mistake is seriously exaggerating, and dont compare our project with Eunomia.
What do you mean doing job properly? Explaining to you is our way to show we are doing our job properly. what else do you need as proof? We have apologize and show all the evidence that this is trully misscommunication.
I think what you are trying to do, is FORCING your opinion That we are Scam project.
Being covered in many publications showing our intent to work honest and not scamming people.
