https://binance.zendesk.com/hc/en-us/articles/115001444731-Binance-Update-2017-09-06
why not delisting BNB token itself?
BNB itself also had an ICO, with 50% of them to public through ICO.
But $BNB already crashing hard.
That is a very good question. I mean PBoC did declare that all Chinese ICOs have to return what was raised to their investors, and did not say that there are any exceptions. So, in my opinion, this means that ANS(NEO) and Binance and every other Chinese ICO that ever was have to refund. NEO council has said that investors have an option to either keep their NEO or get refunded at the ICO price, but Binance hasn't said anything on that matter, so doesn't it makes it illegal in China?
There is still a chance that PBoC will reconsider about total ban on ICOs when there will be regulation in place, but when is that going to happen and what will be with Binance until then?
Also, where did information that Binance is in Hong Kong came from? Who first said it? I did my research and I've found out that BINANCE Limited is registered in Shanghai and not in Hong Kong - which is under mainland chinese jurisdiction unlike HK. Here are some proofs:
1) In this article by Binance it says 'Shanghai' https://binance.zendesk.com/hc/en-us/articles/115001395712-Binance-Gets-VC-Investments
2) Ever noticed '© 2017 Binance.com All Rights Reserved 沪ICP备17028955号' at the bottom of Binance page? Guess what? 沪ICP备17028955号 - is a Chinese registration number, try google it - and here is what you will find: http://www.beianhao.net/IcpBeian/%E6%B2%AAICP%E5%A4%8717028955%E5%8F%B7.html
And if you google-translate the page it says Shanghai all over the place!
You guys have any thoughts?