Short-term, central banks seem to rule the economy nowadays, but long-term, their money only loses value.
What makes you believe they won't win long term? They have more tools than we can imagine.
This is what "winning" looks like for central banks:
Bitcoin without proper use (e.g. Binance) - would be a trouble.
Bitcoin existed before Binance, and will still exist long after Binance is gone and forgotten. Bitcoin doesn't need Binance.
Proper use is explained in the title of the Bitcoin whitepaper:
Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System.
Clearly regulation is what most governments look for - but what if the entire economy will be digitalized like Bitcoin (yes, no more "Swift" for wire transfers) - and still the 21st Bitcoin so many talked about could bring the end of Bitcoin?
Who talked about the end of Bitcoin? And have you asked yourself why they feel the need to talk about it?
Then what do you have left? Ethereum?
Lol. Another centrally controlled shitcoin that abanoned their USP (Code is law) the moment it was convenient to protect their own interests.
The centeral banks cannot be underestimated, they are the ones with unlimited supply of cash to do whatever floats their boats.
And they truely fear Bitcoin's potential to take that power away from them.
Say you can get a Passport from some island across the ocean, but you can't use it at all, no country in the world would accept you with this Passport, not even for travel - then what good use can you make out of this Passport? (ask the same about Bitcoin/Binance etc.)
That's a bad example. Bitcoin knows no borders, and there's always someone willing to accept it.
Binance on the other hand: I couldn't care less. I don't use them, I don't like them, and clearly their own financial interests are different than the interests of the Bitcoin community.