If we draw some parallels with SEC and Binance situation, the US is clearly attacking Binance (and Bitcoin in general), because they dared to refuse to ban Russian customers. I guess you can call the US a terrorist state then? Which can try to close any exchange to reach their goals? Pretty much any economy in the World can suffer from the economic terror of the US. If you can't see these similarities here, that's hypocrisy.
Great answer, thank you ! I'll explain why
Breaking laws, violating CONTRACTS, financing terrorism, or helping rogue countries/regimes to circumvent sanctions, are ILLEGAL ACTIVITIES !
And here again, it's perfectly obvious that you're trying to wishful thinking - that it's "the US fighting Binance and BITCOIN".
Would you care to prove your statement, and show where else the U.S. is fighting BITCOIN, accusing the structures of financing terrorism and violating their commitments, and demanding a ban on BITCOIN transactions ?
By the way. question, part two - in which part of the SEC claim does the demand to Binance prohibit or limit the Bitcoin transactions sound? I'm waiting very carefully for the reasoned advice, with links to the original documents corresponding to your "morass"
At this point, I have to ask: where have you spent last 10-13 years?
It's common knowledge that all countries are generally against Bitcoin, because Bitcoin is a threat to banks and their existence.
And note it's merely my opinion, not a fact so I'm not obliged to provide any sources (unlike you posting your fake news without sources and pretending they're real facts haha). But nevertheless I will:
"Now, the Biden administration has been accused of trying to "quietly" ban bitcoin, ethereum and other cryptocurrencies in a move that's been described as "Operation Choke Point 2.0"—referring to a 2013 government initiative that sought to cut off undesirable industries from banking services."
"The U.S. government is using the banking sector to organize a sophisticated, widespread crackdown against the crypto industry,"
"And the administration’s efforts are no secret: they’re expressed plainly in memos, regulatory guidance, and blog posts. However, the breadth of this plan—spanning virtually every financial regulator—as well as its highly coordinated nature, has even the most steely-eyed crypto veterans nervous that crypto businesses might end up completely unbanked, stablecoins may be stranded and unable to manage flows in and out of crypto, and exchanges might be shut off from the banking system entirely."
https://www.forbes.com/sites/billybambrough/2023/02/09/us-accused-of-trying-to-quietly-ban-bitcoin-ethereum-and-crypto/?sh=6b7762e86403The lack of regulatory clarity is a common complaint among crypto firms, which argue that the United States is pushing the industry overseas, and ultimately ceding authority to foreign regulators that have established clearer guidelines.
And that may be true, but Gary Gensler, the outspoken crypto-skeptic and top cop at the SEC, doesn’t seem to care.
“Look, we don’t need more digital currency,” Gensler told CNBC on Tuesday. “We already have digital currency: It’s called the US dollar. It’s called the euro or it’s called the yen; they’re all digital right now. We already have digital investments.”
https://edition.cnn.com/2023/06/06/business/nightcap-crypto-sec-binance-coinbase/index.htmlAnd I could go on and on and on...
Breaking laws, violating CONTRACTS, financing terrorism, or helping rogue countries/regimes to circumvent sanctions, are ILLEGAL ACTIVITIES !
Oh, come on, grow up. These are the formal reasons presented to the public. But everybody knows what the REAL reasons are...