This from
their twitter:
After speaking with various parties, including
@JeremyRubin,
@_prestwich,
@bcmakes,
@hasufl,
@JihanWu and others, we decided NOT to pursue the re-org approach. Considerations being:
Pros:
- 1 we could "revenge" the hackers by "moving" the fees to miners;
- 2 deter future hacking attempts in the process.
- 3 explore the possibility of how bitcoin network would deal with situations like these.
Cons:
- 1 we may damage credibility of BTC,
- 2 we may cause a split in both the bitcoin network and community. Both of these damages seems to out-weight $40m revenge.
- 3 the hackers did demonstrate certain weak points in our design and user confusion, that was not obvious before.
- 4 While it is a very expensive lesson for us, it is nevertheless a lesson. it was our responsibility to safe guard user funds. We should own up it. We will learn and improve. As always, thank you for your support!
And as someone correctly pointed out (in the
second comment):
🌮You didn't decide not to, you realized you cannot.
true that too, that's what Jihan advised/educated me on too. I trust his advice.
Why would you even consider it? If Binance can re-org Bitcoin we might as well all get out of crypto as JP Morgan and the Fed could too.
people still don't understand the value of immutability, the whole point is people shouldn't cover others stupidity
It's scary that you considered rollback option on #BTC chain.
would be very hard to pull off anyway, not for $40m. Most miners will not "centralize" together just for that. But it was suggested by some great minds, we learned, considered, and decided not to pursue further.
What is exactly in the mind of these people, Reorganize Bitcoin? Just what those millionaires think they are, lol it took their fellow Jihan Wu to straight them out... (Ie. "I tried but failed...").
Also they should learn from Ethereum when they did that grave mistake that split their blockchain forever...
"
Not for $40m"... So they haven't learned their lesson. Some millionaire out there still thinks he can pull off a Bitcoin reorg if he loses some more. Thanks their
leniency they "just" losing $40m... What amount would it warrant them doing a fork, or would that be a 51% attack?