I must admit crypto-trade does like promising, although I don't know their stance on allowing more securities.
Looking forward to more improvements and updates.
Topic: [Bit Funder] [btcquick] [Rising profits] - page 7. (Read 42866 times)
I will not be disclosing why. That is like giving away all the questions for a test. Just know that we are working very hard to collect sufficient data to prevent fraud. There is no guide on how to prevent fraud related to bitcoin and we are learning as we go.
The entire "we won't say what's going on but we're working very hard" hasn't turned out well for anyone. What test, from whom do you surmise you need to keep this information?
So, pro tip #1: there's so much to do and so few people capable of doing it in Bitcoin that if your plan makes sense and you seem even remotely competent everyone else who is competent will breathe a sigh of relief. They aren't going to "steal" your idea of doing the absolutely fucking obviously banal, cause so much is needed I couldn't begin to tell you.
Pro tip #2: if you are incompetent, the people who are competent aren't going to steal your business early. They are going to steal it late, just like MPEx demolished GLBSE. They don't need early mover advantage, they will come to your market six months or a year late, break off your arms and beat you over the head with them until you are reduced to a bloody mess.
So, forget about anyone "Stealing" your business. When S.DICE was announced, a bunch of forum muppets rambled on about how it's not worth its valuation because "everyone could do it". And I laughed at them then and so to prove my point that they're laughable idiots they declared that they shall do it! It's been months, who has managed to steal the business? You can't steal any business from the competent, and if you're competent yourself you don't even try to, cause it makes no business sense.
Pro tip #2: if you are incompetent, the people who are competent aren't going to steal your business early. They are going to steal it late, just like MPEx demolished GLBSE. They don't need early mover advantage, they will come to your market six months or a year late, break off your arms and beat you over the head with them until you are reduced to a bloody mess.
So, forget about anyone "Stealing" your business. When S.DICE was announced, a bunch of forum muppets rambled on about how it's not worth its valuation because "everyone could do it". And I laughed at them then and so to prove my point that they're laughable idiots they declared that they shall do it! It's been months, who has managed to steal the business? You can't steal any business from the competent, and if you're competent yourself you don't even try to, cause it makes no business sense.
That whole working without a guide issue? It gives you an opportunity to do something potentially very valuable for bitcoin: document your experience, and do it well.
You know what's funny? They wouldn't tell us their 'big secret' in here but they will tell the world in a Coindesk article. Bit odd, no?
Why are you not putting the stock up on crypto stocks, if labcoin can be listed on it, i don;t see why a legitiamate company like BTCquick can not be listed on it
If a stock exchange allows shady companies, it is itself shady.
Hence legit companies should want to have nothing to do with that.
True i guess.....
What about 796.com and crypto-trade.com? Based in HK.
is btcquick still live? I payd the membersheep fee, i submitet my documents and i emailed them twice but no answer in a week so far...
better change the name to btcslow.
better change the name to btcslow.
Why are you not putting the stock up on crypto stocks, if labcoin can be listed on it, i don;t see why a legitiamate company like BTCquick can not be listed on it
If a stock exchange allows shady companies, it is itself shady.
Hence legit companies should want to have nothing to do with that.
True i guess.....
Why are you not putting the stock up on crypto stocks, if labcoin can be listed on it, i don;t see why a legitiamate company like BTCquick can not be listed on it
If a stock exchange allows shady companies, it is itself shady.
Hence legit companies should want to have nothing to do with that.
Why are you not putting the stock up on crypto stocks, if labcoin can be listed on it, i don;t see why a legitiamate company like BTCquick can not be listed on it
Most likely, the company or some private investors will try to buy back all the shares. I think this is the only reasonable solution for BtcQuick now. Therefore, actually panic selling now may not be beneficial to us, the public investors, but to the private investors.
Unfortunately, 1M shares previously stayed in the IPO price ask position was sold directly to the bid wall and crashed the price to 0.00055.
Unfortunately, 1M shares previously stayed in the IPO price ask position was sold directly to the bid wall and crashed the price to 0.00055.
Having all the legal opinions in the world won't stop btcquick getting shutdown it might keep the owner out of jail but thats about it.
Are you suggesting that in that case the owner should just risk getting to jail, instead?But is it risky if the company only issues shares to non-US residents?
It does not matter where the shares are issued, the company is based in the USA therefore we fall under the laws of the land.
Thanks for the reply, Ascension. So is it possible for btcQuick to register with SEC?
Bitfunder has to do first.
mark
Having all the legal opinions in the world won't stop btcquick getting shutdown it might keep the owner out of jail but thats about it.
Are you suggesting that in that case the owner should just risk getting to jail, instead?But is it risky if the company only issues shares to non-US residents?
It does not matter where the shares are issued, the company is based in the USA therefore we fall under the laws of the land.
Thanks for the reply, Ascension. So is it possible for btcQuick to register with SEC?
Having all the legal opinions in the world won't stop btcquick getting shutdown it might keep the owner out of jail but thats about it.
Are you suggesting that in that case the owner should just risk getting to jail, instead?But is it risky if the company only issues shares to non-US residents?
It does not matter where the shares are issued, the company is based in the USA therefore we fall under the laws of the land.
Having all the legal opinions in the world won't stop btcquick getting shutdown it might keep the owner out of jail but thats about it.
Are you suggesting that in that case the owner should just risk getting to jail, instead?But is it risky if the company only issues shares to non-US residents?
It does not matter where the shares are issued, the company is based in the USA therefore we fall under the laws of the land.
Could you please introduce the legal issues btcquick may risk?
Having all the legal opinions in the world won't stop btcquick getting shutdown it might keep the owner out of jail but thats about it.
Are you suggesting that in that case the owner should just risk getting to jail, instead?But is it risky if the company only issues shares to non-US residents?
It does not matter where the shares are issued, the company is based in the USA therefore we fall under the laws of the land.
Ascension please have your webmaster do a quick edit of the btcQuick webpage, there are two glaring typos. It should be "Fees" not "Fee's" and "Buy bitcoins" not "Buy bitcoin's."
May seem like a trifling matter, but when we're talking about moving a lot of money around and building credibility, that sort of typographical error can push people away.
Thanks.
May seem like a trifling matter, but when we're talking about moving a lot of money around and building credibility, that sort of typographical error can push people away.
Thanks.
Having all the legal opinions in the world won't stop btcquick getting shutdown it might keep the owner out of jail but thats about it.
Are you suggesting that in that case the owner should just risk getting to jail, instead?But is it risky if the company only issues shares to non-US residents?
YES, what btcquick is currently doing is illegal it doesn't matter who owns the company. they need to get compliant before they get a cease and desist letter from the DoJ it's basically that simple in my eyes at least.
use debit card or credit card to buy bitcoin is illegal? then what of methods should we used to buy bitcoin is so called legally?
I think buying bitcoin is like trading your currency with private money ,and most countries won't recognized this transaction as a legal move..
the only guys who really worried about this issue is the issuer because he might go to jail for it.
Having all the legal opinions in the world won't stop btcquick getting shutdown it might keep the owner out of jail but thats about it.
Are you suggesting that in that case the owner should just risk getting to jail, instead?But is it risky if the company only issues shares to non-US residents?
YES, what btcquick is currently doing is illegal it doesn't matter who owns the company. they need to get compliant before they get a cease and desist letter from the DoJ it's basically that simple in my eyes at least.
Having all the legal opinions in the world won't stop btcquick getting shutdown it might keep the owner out of jail but thats about it.
Are you suggesting that in that case the owner should just risk getting to jail, instead?But is it risky if the company only issues shares to non-US residents?
Having all the legal opinions in the world won't stop btcquick getting shutdown it might keep the owner out of jail but thats about it.
Are you suggesting that in that case the owner should just risk getting to jail, instead?Having all the legal opinions in the world won't stop btcquick getting shutdown it might keep the owner out of jail but thats about it.
Are you suggesting that in that case the owner should just risk getting to jail, instead?Jump to: