[BIT-X.com] [CoinsBank.com] Earn Bitcoins by Posting | Signature Campaign - page 330.

irfan_pak10

legendary

Activity: 3234

Merit: 1654

Enterapp Pre-Sale Live - bit.ly/3UrMCWI

Quote from: marcotheminer on November 30, 2014, 12:39:20 PM

UPDATE:

Posting in ['x'] board requirements have been removed.

Please do try to post in bitcoin discussion and beginners & help anyway!

We all know that you are trying to get more exposure of your site and want your site to reach a maximum number of visitor and members every day. we really try to help you out and make posts in all the section but please don't make us bound that do this thing or this or avoid this Wink

thanks

gkv9

legendary

Activity: 1246

Merit: 1000

!!! RiSe aBovE ThE StoRm !!!

@marcotheminer,
Are all the Full Member slots filled? It's seriously my bad this time I didn't receive any code and just promises from their side that they are fixing it. I've checked the google docs spreadsheet and I think I'm out of the game. Please update me whether shall I still put the signature or remove it?

hilariousandco

global moderator

Activity: 4046

Merit: 2732

Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!

Quote from: Quickseller on November 30, 2014, 11:57:44 AM

Quote from: hilariousandco on November 30, 2014, 11:30:52 AM

Quote from: marcotheminer on November 30, 2014, 10:47:09 AM

Rule update:
Minimum of 5 new topics (that's only one or two a week) in the bitcoin discussion board (make them interesting and relevant to news and continually reply to the discussion in the thread!)

What is the point in this and how is it even enforceable? Are you going to go through everybody's posts (potentially hundreds) one by one to check if they've made the mandatory minimum five threads? You can't even tell if they created the thread just by looking at their post history anyway. Seems more hassle than it's worth and will only cause problems for everyone.

You can look at the title of the thread in a person's post history. If the title starts with a "Re:" then it is a reply, if he title of the post does not have this then it is a new thread (at least this is how it is by default, someone could manually change the post title).

I think he is trying to weed out spammers with this rule (and others). I personally think this will end up backfiring as people will get denied payment for breaking the rules and get upset. Anyone that is denied payment for breaking the rules has the potential to make a lot of noise about the company and will likely counter the positive effect of signature advertising. I think the way that EvilPanda handles the GAW campaign (and the way that Stunna handled the PD campaign) is much more effective and less reputation risky then the way that the luckyb.it campaign is run (on the other end of the spectrum).

The result of this rule will probably be a lot more threads like this.

It will backfire especially if people are denied payment over technicalities. It's also still not really feasible to go through potentially hundreds of posts per user to check. This rule just creates more hassle for everyone - users, campaign manager and staff. There's easier ways to weed out spammers: check their posts before they sign up, keep an eye on them whilst they're posting and check again at the end of the term before you send payment.

Quote from: marcotheminer on November 30, 2014, 12:39:20 PM

UPDATE:

Posting in ['x'] board requirements have been removed.

Please do try to post in bitcoin discussion and beginners & help anyway!

Glad to see. I think this will benefit everyone.

marcotheminer

legendary

Activity: 2072

Merit: 1049

┴puoʎǝq ʞool┴

UPDATE:

Posting in ['x'] board requirements have been removed.

Please do try to post in bitcoin discussion and beginners & help anyway!

Testing123

hero member

Activity: 561

Merit: 500

Quote from: ikydesu on November 30, 2014, 12:23:02 PM

Quote from: marcotheminer on November 30, 2014, 11:52:16 AM

Rule updates:
Minimum of 10+ posts in the bitcoin discussion board. (this is a minimum NOT a max)
Mimimum of 10+ posts in the beginners & help board. (this is a minimum NOT a max)

Must post minimum 10 post in bitcoin discussion and beginners & help? or select between?

~~Looks like Macro has updated the numbers from 10+ to 5+.~~

~~I believe you need to fulfill both the two requirements.~~

Edit: Please read the latest update in the next post by Macro.

detector

full member

Activity: 484

Merit: 124

★

Too many rule! Too many restrictions
At the end, all campaigner will get upset if they did not paid,
And this signature campaign is very not effective

Anyway

Good luck for who has joined and remember those restrict rule Roll Eyes

marcotheminer

legendary

Activity: 2072

Merit: 1049

┴puoʎǝq ʞool┴

Quote from: Brewins on November 30, 2014, 12:28:52 PM

By the way, when will the campaign starts?

It has already started!

Brewins

legendary

Activity: 1120

Merit: 1000

Quote from: Quickseller on November 30, 2014, 11:57:44 AM

Quote from: hilariousandco on November 30, 2014, 11:30:52 AM

Quote from: marcotheminer on November 30, 2014, 10:47:09 AM

Rule update:
Minimum of 5 new topics (that's only one or two a week) in the bitcoin discussion board (make them interesting and relevant to news and continually reply to the discussion in the thread!)

What is the point in this and how is it even enforceable? Are you going to go through everybody's posts (potentially hundreds) one by one to check if they've made the mandatory minimum five threads? You can't even tell if they created the thread just by looking at their post history anyway. Seems more hassle than it's worth and will only cause problems for everyone.

You can look at the title of the thread in a person's post history. If the title starts with a "Re:" then it is a reply, if he title of the post does not have this then it is a new thread (at least this is how it is by default, someone could manually change the post title).

I think he is trying to weed out spammers with this rule (and others). I personally think this will end up backfiring as people will get denied payment for breaking the rules and get upset. Anyone that is denied payment for breaking the rules has the potential to make a lot of noise about the company and will likely counter the positive effect of signature advertising. I think the way that EvilPanda handles the GAW campaign (and the way that Stunna handled the PD campaign) is much more effective and less reputation risky then the way that the luckyb.it campaign is run (on the other end of the spectrum).

The result of this rule will probably be a lot more threads like this.

You can edit the title of the reply you get. You can even take off the re thing, like I did, and make looks like you created the topic, by your logic.

By the way, when will the campaign start?

ikydesu

hero member

Activity: 686

Merit: 500

fb.com/Bitky.shop | Bitcoin Merch!Premium Quality!

Quote from: marcotheminer on November 30, 2014, 11:52:16 AM

Rule updates:
Minimum of 10+ posts in the bitcoin discussion board. (this is a minimum NOT a max)
Mimimum of 10+ posts in the beginners & help board. (this is a minimum NOT a max)

Must post minimum 10 post in bitcoin discussion and beginners & help? or select between?

jw_industry

sr. member

Activity: 327

Merit: 250

I will like to join

botany

legendary

Activity: 1582

Merit: 1064

Quote from: Quickseller on November 30, 2014, 11:57:44 AM

Quote from: hilariousandco on November 30, 2014, 11:30:52 AM

Quote from: marcotheminer on November 30, 2014, 10:47:09 AM

Rule update:
Minimum of 5 new topics (that's only one or two a week) in the bitcoin discussion board (make them interesting and relevant to news and continually reply to the discussion in the thread!)

What is the point in this and how is it even enforceable? Are you going to go through everybody's posts (potentially hundreds) one by one to check if they've made the mandatory minimum five threads? You can't even tell if they created the thread just by looking at their post history anyway. Seems more hassle than it's worth and will only cause problems for everyone.

You can look at the title of the thread in a person's post history. If the title starts with a "Re:" then it is a reply, if he title of the post does not have this then it is a new thread (at least this is how it is by default, someone could manually change the post title).

I think he is trying to weed out spammers with this rule (and others). I personally think this will end up backfiring as people will get denied payment for breaking the rules and get upset. Anyone that is denied payment for breaking the rules has the potential to make a lot of noise about the company and will likely counter the positive effect of signature advertising. I think the way that EvilPanda handles the GAW campaign (and the way that Stunna handled the PD campaign) is much more effective and less reputation risky then the way that the luckyb.it campaign is run (on the other end of the spectrum).

The result of this rule will probably be a lot more threads like this.

I tend to agree with you there. Weeding out spammers should be done while selecting participants. An effective tactic would be denying people with low quality posts the chance to participate in subsequent campaigns. They are less likely to make noise if they are paid, but are not allowed to participate in the next term.

Quickseller

copper member

Activity: 2996

Merit: 2374

Quote from: hilariousandco on November 30, 2014, 11:30:52 AM

Quote from: marcotheminer on November 30, 2014, 10:47:09 AM

Rule update:
Minimum of 5 new topics (that's only one or two a week) in the bitcoin discussion board (make them interesting and relevant to news and continually reply to the discussion in the thread!)

What is the point in this and how is it even enforceable? Are you going to go through everybody's posts (potentially hundreds) one by one to check if they've made the mandatory minimum five threads? You can't even tell if they created the thread just by looking at their post history anyway. Seems more hassle than it's worth and will only cause problems for everyone.

You can look at the title of the thread in a person's post history. If the title starts with a "Re:" then it is a reply, if he title of the post does not have this then it is a new thread (at least this is how it is by default, someone could manually change the post title).

I think he is trying to weed out spammers with this rule (and others). I personally think this will end up backfiring as people will get denied payment for breaking the rules and get upset. Anyone that is denied payment for breaking the rules has the potential to make a lot of noise about the company and will likely counter the positive effect of signature advertising. I think the way that EvilPanda handles the GAW campaign (and the way that Stunna handled the PD campaign) is much more effective and less reputation risky then the way that the luckyb.it campaign is run (on the other end of the spectrum).

The result of this rule will probably be a lot more threads like this.

marcotheminer

legendary

Activity: 2072

Merit: 1049

┴puoʎǝq ʞool┴

Quote from: hilariousandco on November 30, 2014, 11:30:52 AM

Quote from: marcotheminer on November 30, 2014, 10:47:09 AM

Rule update:
Minimum of 5 new topics (that's only one or two a week) in the bitcoin discussion board (make them interesting and relevant to news and continually reply to the discussion in the thread!)

What is the point in this and how is it even enforceable? Are you going to go through everybody's posts (potentially hundreds) one by one to check if they've made the mandatory minimum five threads? You can't even tell if they created the thread just by looking at their post history anyway. Seems more hassle than it's worth and will only cause problems for everyone.

It would be enforceable, without too much hassle.

This rule has been removed however. The following have been added.

Rule updates:
Minimum of 5+ posts in the bitcoin discussion board. (this is a minimum NOT a max)
Mimimum of 5+ posts in the beginners & help board. (this is a minimum NOT a max)

Personal Message text must not advertise another site (it can be something personal, not a site)

Effective immediately.

botany

legendary

Activity: 1582

Merit: 1064

Quote from: hilariousandco on November 30, 2014, 11:30:52 AM

Quote from: marcotheminer on November 30, 2014, 10:47:09 AM

Rule update:
Minimum of 5 new topics (that's only one or two a week) in the bitcoin discussion board (make them interesting and relevant to news and continually reply to the discussion in the thread!)

What is the point in this and how is it even enforceable? Are you going to go through everybody's posts (potentially hundreds) one by one to check if they've made the mandatory minimum five threads? You can't even tell if they created the thread just by looking at their post history anyway. Seems more hassle than it's worth and will only cause problems for everyone.

Enforcing this should be pretty simple.
You have a stat panel for each person's profile.
You can pull out details - including post count and number of topics started. A simple script can do this.
Run this script at the start and end of the term - voila, you have the number of topics started.

In my personal opinion, this rule will lead to more irritating spam. If spammy posts are buried deep inside, you can ignore them. If there are spammy topics, they will be more irritating.

hilariousandco

global moderator

Activity: 4046

Merit: 2732

Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!

Quote from: marcotheminer on November 30, 2014, 10:47:09 AM

Rule update:
Minimum of 5 new topics (that's only one or two a week) in the bitcoin discussion board (make them interesting and relevant to news and continually reply to the discussion in the thread!)

What is the point in this and how is it even enforceable? Are you going to go through everybody's posts (potentially hundreds) one by one to check if they've made the mandatory minimum five threads? You can't even tell if they created the thread just by looking at their post history anyway. Seems more hassle than it's worth and will only cause problems for everyone.

Nobitcoin

legendary

Activity: 966

Merit: 1000

In holiday we trust

~~Name: Nobitcoin~~
~~Posts: 1316~~
~~Activity: 308~~
~~Position: Senior Member~~
~~Bitcoin address: 1NYaBPmrUjGZ5WA7iiPkDGcd7EBZKNTECW~~
~~Bit-X : 33PAco5cQHcNK6G4rFbggKLz9R9WUftXPB~~

Count me out just read your rules this campaign is no fun sorry I think I'll wait for another.

marcotheminer

legendary

Activity: 2072

Merit: 1049

┴puoʎǝq ʞool┴

Quote from: Malin Keshar on November 30, 2014, 10:54:14 AM

Quote from: BitCoinDream on November 30, 2014, 10:51:24 AM

Quote from: marcotheminer on November 30, 2014, 10:47:09 AM

Rule update:
Minimum of 5 new topics (that's only one or two a week) in the bitcoin discussion board (make them interesting and relevant to news and continually reply to the discussion in the thread!)

This will give them a lot of exposure. Please update it in the OP.

As long we don't see people spamming low contend topics only to get their quota.

That will fall under spam and they won't be counted.

Remember: Make high quality topics, not only in the bitcoin discussion board, everywhere!

Malin Keshar

hero member

Activity: 616

Merit: 500

Quote from: BitCoinDream on November 30, 2014, 10:51:24 AM

Quote from: marcotheminer on November 30, 2014, 10:47:09 AM

Rule update:
Minimum of 5 new topics (that's only one or two a week) in the bitcoin discussion board (make them interesting and relevant to news and continually reply to the discussion in the thread!)

This will give them a lot of exposure. Please update it in the OP.

As long we don't see people spamming low contend topics only to get their quota.

BitCoinDream

legendary

Activity: 2394

Merit: 1216

The revolution will be digital

Quote from: marcotheminer on November 30, 2014, 10:47:09 AM

Rule update:
Minimum of 5 new topics (that's only one or two a week) in the bitcoin discussion board (make them interesting and relevant to news and continually reply to the discussion in the thread!)

This will give them a lot of exposure. Please update it in the OP.

marcotheminer

legendary

Activity: 2072

Merit: 1049

┴puoʎǝq ʞool┴

Rule update:
Minimum of 5 new topics (that's only one or two a week) in the bitcoin discussion board (make them interesting and relevant to news and continually reply to the discussion in the thread!)

Topic: [BIT-X.com] [CoinsBank.com] Earn Bitcoins by Posting | Signature Campaign - page 330. (Read 554259 times)