Topic: [BIT-X.com] [CoinsBank.com] Earn Bitcoins by Posting | Signature Campaign - page 79. (Read 554235 times)

Glad he is giving out feedback to you now.

I agree with you wholeheartedly on this concern you have. That was not my intention.
If want to talk about this further take to this thread I mentioned earlier. My answer is there to:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/signature-campaigns-the-truth-1221682

I answered your question in my post. Next please.

my question was actually, why you're enrolled, if you can post many post without the signature, not how many post you will do anyway without it...

there is a big difference..

I am quite patient and don't mind waiting. I just asked for an update yesterday and Marco already replied

I just asked you this question as many here are now arguing with each other and this thread has become a war zone. Each member putting down the other.

As soon as you see management of any entity cutting out members(in essence laying off staff in the working world) for varies reasons their is something wrong either with the company (campaign in this instance) or the performance of the members involved.
I am sure your camp manager will come forward with his reported findings soon. Both economical and participation wise.
Give Macrotheminer time.

@Android: I don't get the reason why have you taken interest to post in this thread. Why are you getting affected by members asking for their payment and calling them shameless?

I suggest bring this further conversation to:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.12838264

or mexxer-2 might see this as Signature Campaign Spam  

We don't want to aggravate Macrotheminer with polluting his camp's thread any further. 
He has payments to sort out.

I have a combined post count of probably ~4k+ posts in different forums around the internet, around 3k of those completely unpaid (as they weren't here). I post here to help people out with code and because Bitcoin interests me. I do not get paid for the coding that I do for other people, so I consider a signature campaign to be the best way to do so. If signature campaigns were abolished, my posting habits wouldn't change too much; I post on forums and topics that interest me, not that pay me.

I did the count from Oct31 12am-11:59pm and I did 28 posts. So that clap was not needed, but thanks regardless  I don't keep track of how many posts I do on a daily basis because I am not anal about the specifics like that unless I was counting down how much I make per day to the penny. Anyhow, that's the campaign manager job to do. I have faith in mine and don't question anything they do. They have been ontime with their answers to many others questions and are honest with us in any situation that arises. Whether it be time of next payouts or member's ranking, which I have never had a concern about and I don't think I ever will.
To answer your question, it was Saturday (and Halloween giving out the candy and being here inbetween delays of the little ones at my door ), so I was off work and had more time to spend on the forums. I do work a regular 8 hour mon-fri job so only have Saturdays to actually go through more posts that interest me.
If you have faith in this campaign I wouldn't question the campaign manager's loyalty to their members, or you might find yourself weeded out of as well.

Haha yeah tell me more, you posted 34 posts yesterday. Claps for you I guess.
And when did the discussion turn from "Not getting paid" to one of those boring and usually drama inducing "Signature campaign spam" again? If you consider a signature campaign like https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/we-pay-for-signature-even-more-up-to-00016-btcs-per-post-w-600446 which refused payment , a scam, Bit-x not paying should be held in the same light unless the cause is given. All I got from marco was "Some problem with bot, payment will be made shortly" , and the payment is still not done.

This is exactly how I view it too. I post on another forum the same amount as I do here and do not have any form of payments for posts there. Why I do it you would question to ask? For the fun of interacting with fellow members of the community and to get THEIR OPINIONS on certain topics that we are all interested in. Not to get paid at the bottom dollar for it.   

I post the same amount with it without a signature. It is strictly bonus coins for doing something I already would be doing anyways. If you treat it as a job then you will post more stuff that does not help anyone. I am flat rate paid anyways.

If you even care to see on secondstrade count sheet I have never and even tried to REACH MAX post counts. Oh and I did say "THEY STOP" when they have reached their 100 posts you can clearly see this on the Bit-X data sheet of all the members who do this just to get paid. Why exert themselves any further if they are not getting paid, right?  Good thing Macro is weeding these ones out of his campaign.
I do not post because I feel obligated to. I do it because I want to participate in the forum as I am an avid forum user on many other forums for many years and just recently got into bitcoin so joined this forum and didn't even have interest in signature campaigns upon joining.
Hey everybody has their agendas but mine is not greed. And concerning my posts: I don't start conversations because I am not as knowledgeable as most here when it comes to the topic at hand but instead I'd rather contribute what I do know so far to the threads you have questioned.
If nobody posted when they wanted to give an opinion(which I am doing now) then what use is a forum? It is to see other's points of views and to learn from each other. But to see people in sig camps posting 30+ a day, take that as you see it. If you don't like it then tell the camp manager and let them decide if they are performing outside their rules.

Mat I ask why you are currently n the secondstrade campaign then? What is your sole purpose of wearing their signature and posting? Shouldn't it be the same reason as you stated as a shame? If you claim that you arr posting here in the forum just yo post then IMO youcare lying because I can clearly see it through your post that it is not made to start a conversation or something but it was posted because you yourself are trging to reach the max post number to get your whole payment for the week. It's not an issue of asking aboit the delayed payment. It's pretty normal to wonder why the payment is late and it has nothing to do with poating in this forum just to get paid for it.

This is kind of silly to if you ask me. People who are posting just to make the maximum then stop isn't really in it for the spirit of what a forum was created for but instead to just see it as a cash grab. For the ones constantly asking where is my payment, for shame. If it is because you are depending on it as income and want it paid "right now, on time" to pay your utility bills, well I honestly am sorry for you.

well i can't do nothing if he decide to take me out, but like i've said it is obvious that if someone is carrying a signature, he do it for the money, otherwise everyone is lying here, because he would post without the signature... why all you guys are enrolling then?

anyway.. i want to say one thing, i would write the exact same post if i was without signature campaign, the only difference would be the numbers of post

Because Amph openly only posts for the signature earnings. Marco said that anyone that only posts for the earnings will be removed from the campaign. Try reading the thread.

Really though, as happy as I'm sure it would make several members on the forum, I really doubt Amph will get kicked from the campaign. I would like to be proven wrong though.

why is there a problem when he is not banned even after getting noticed ? looks something personal.

Read this statement.. He has stated a few times now he only posts for payment.

I can't find much fault in his posts. Posts in this thread would automatically be excluded from the final payment. I can seem to find a rule which prevents posting solely for profit. I agree that it should be seen as a tip though.