So victory is not due to luck.
Maybe this tournament is aimed at those who are able to spend a lot of money, but spending money on bets will pay off in a very valuable way because the winning prizes are many times bigger than the money used to participate in the tournament.
Luck does matter here just like in any other gambling game to a certain extent. Spending lots of money doesn't guarantee that you will win if luck doesn't side with you. Invest only what you are willing to lose.
I second this concept. Luck does matter especially when you are against a player with a huge bankroll. To be able to sustain your wagering, you need to win and better if you win big multiplier. Winning huge multiplier or winning back what we wager can extend our betting longer, and since most tournament depends on the amount of wagering done, recovering losses can refresh our bankroll and enable us to wager more thus acquiring more points to get higher on the ranking.
The first prediction was placed. I don't think it's logical to become a winner again 😉
It's completely logical since both events are completely independent of each other. One example is LFC who win two events back to back.
In a prediction game, it is logical to win more than back-to-back if you happen to predict the price of Bitcoin consecutively. I think there is no restriction on the number of times an account can win in the prediction game. And that opens the possibility of winning more than once or twice.