Topic: Bitcasinorank.com - Reviews and ranking of Crypto Casinos - page 6. (Read 1812 times)

Hello bitcasinorank,

I have been looking at your site again, but it strikes me that there are other casinos that you place from ranking 1 that I have not seen that type of reviews, and well I respect your criteria, but seeing that several people in the forum have from the ranking 1 high-level casinos with a high reputation, does not match your criteria. The criteria to take into account more or less in what parameters does it do it? since apparently they are criteria that others do not take into account,

 thank you very much in advance.

You make those reviews by observing the casino only or you are a gambler too? In the ‘Reputation’ part you have given the example of other rating websites. I liked that, but winz.io have only 5 reviews on trustpilot. It's normal to have good ratings from low number of reviews. And you should include some important information of their TOS in your review. As example, the details of KYC policy, Dormant Accounts, multiple accounts. You only mentioned that their TOS is standard.

Hello everyone!

Please check my new review for Winz.io

I don't think that a betting platform has a need for a provably fair system, the site doesn't have a control over the matches so I don't think it's useless for them to implement the system, I think it's used in roulletes, blackjack and other probability games.

Website looks good but what I really do like about it is how do you rank them or your criteria in ranking the casinos for what I've seen there's only few at the moment are you waiting for them to contact your first? or that's the only casino so far you have seen great?

For me the Provably Fair is what will always rule in the world of casinos and betting, based on sports bets the use of sports bets can be realized, in fact here in the forum they are already offering a service that has to do with Provably Fair, I think it is interesting although they are starting up but it has a very good reception here in the forum: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/provablyfairme-bet-verifiers-fair-gambling-5360001

The article is interesting, I do not have deep knowledge about this but it is a topic that must be covered and mastered, especially for those of us who are playing on platforms and assets.

Thank you very much for your comment and for the good words about the article. For some reason, I didn't think about betting when I was writing this article. Probably that's because I usually don't work with betting. But I will definitely research this topic and update the article.

Regarding the casino reviews, I write all the texts on my own and have to do all other work on the site, so new casino reviews are rare guests. But more are coming of course

Article was well written, but did you find more information what betting websites are using Provably Fair algorithm system and what are the differences between them?
I saw you wrote that PrimeDice, BitDice, Bitsler, Bustabit and Stake are using it, but can this be applied for Sports betting, so we can confirm we placed a bet on some match?
You should add more reviews for casinos, I only see four now on your website.

Hi, bitcasinorank YarW!

The community in general need of websites of this type, but also with another type of appreciation or the classic approach to the game.

At nascent era Casinos Online the best reviews were with the players themselves (on "blogs" poker in my case) who showed us their experience to make us the shortest way in how to reach VIP levels, playing times, etc... in short, things have changed and now that falls to a part of the Youtuber / Twichtv.

Anyway, I chose a casino and went to the point that interested me:
 
^{Source :https://www.bitcasinorank.com/casino/  source/quote Edit with "..."}


My "Final Verdict"  

You understand me, the point is that we need the approach to be better, more daring, this type of reviews is becoming repetitive and only leaves information, it does not leave the essence of a true review, it has become a template / format.

Is your scheme pretty? Yes, is the information understood? Yes. By the way I congratulate you and thank you for leaving a space for us opinion on your website, I recently saw another site of this type and it did not leave space for comment.

I also appreciate the opportunity to express my opinion on forum and we must recognize the effort that goes into making an undertaking of this type and especially with the aim of doing it in crypto.

Ah! the small details are appreciated, the contrast of daytime, night is also appreciated. And perhaps less necessary for the vast majority but it is good to see them below: Privacy PolicyTerms and Condition.

I would add the mission / objective or objective / mission that you placed in the OP. I also liked that button that links to the forum. I'm not asking for anything, I just think out loud.  

RegarbeTs

Hello everyone!

Today I want to introduce my article about the Provably Fair algorithm

If you find any inaccuracies or missing pieces in it, please let me know. The article doesn't have topics Provably Fair Games and Casinos because they will be presented on separate pages.

Thank you for your time.

Do you think they wouldn't have good reputation if they didn't received good feedback?. In my opinion, it is good enough to base it on legitimacy of the platform but still provide something else about the site if there is a small issue if ever there is. About other platforms that doesn't have good reputation needs a thorough reviewing before giving the score.

Making a review doesn't depend on the legitimacy of the casino. The review maker have to check several things at a casino before making a review. And a single person works behind every review making site. That's why it takes long time. Maybe OP was busy with other works as a result he made the detailed review of 4 casinos till now.

I wonder why it takes longer to give reviews since the site is reputable and trusted so op would need to find the negative side of the platform if there is. It's good that op is active on this forum and answer questions from forum users. We could find other review sites like thus but we'll see how different this one is.

I love your effort that you are trying to add many casinos and reviews to your site.
Moreover i am pretty surprised to see that you are adding the review of such a popular site (stake.com ) in so much delay.
The should have been presented first when you opened the site as Stake is one of the biggest site in crypto gambling world.

Nevertheless let’s see what extra you can add to make your site more worthy for the visitors to visit.

I decided to show only casinos that have reviews. Other brands were just added to the site but didn't have a proper review. I will back all of them soon.

Stake.com review is on the way

What made you decide to remove easily the more reputable casinos and show only these 4 on your landing page?

Thank you everyone for the comments. I really appreciate that you spent your time reviewing my work and sharing your thoughts and advice.

I've added a Night Mode to the site like some of you asked. You can switch the mode by pressing Ctrl + Alt + D or in the left-down corner on the screen.

Today I want to ask what real crypto gamblers think about the latest release from Red Tiger studios - NFT Megaways. You can try the game in demo mode and read my review here.

Probably that's the case but we have to understand that OP should've been informed about this already so they avoid the issue entirely and they can create a good reputation around them to help with their site since they're implying that they're going to respond if there's an issue.

I understand, this often happens even for beginners who start with review sites but don't synchronize it with the facts of gambling sites in the real field. I also agree that he was too hasty in this just for the sake of finding affiliates for himself not even noticing the scam sites that were on his list. We just need to shed some light on that on this forum there are already much better casino reputations with much more real reviews.

Well, compared to Stake they have a smaller game selection, their loyalty program is weaker, their withdraws aren't instant, their promotions aren't as good, they haven't been around as long, and afaik it's a mystery who's behind them.