Pages:
Author

Topic: Bitcoin 0.9.0 FINAL is available [Changelog] [Download] - page 7. (Read 38359 times)

full member
Activity: 140
Merit: 100
Successfully upgraded to 0.9.0 Smiley
I like the new receive window and the lowered tx fees, good work devs!
legendary
Activity: 854
Merit: 1000
Hey guys, the linux version doesn't work on centos 6.5 x64. It requires newer version of glibc
I compiled a static version of bitcoind, but still get the same message.

Message is:
--------------------------------
./bitcoind: /usr/lib64/libstdc++.so.6: version `GLIBCXX_3.4.15' not found (required by ./bitcoind)
./bitcoind: /lib64/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.15' not found (required by ./bitcoind)
./bitcoind: /lib64/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.14' not found (required by ./bitcoind)
---------------------------------

Can this be fixed in anyway?

Thanks!
This is a known issue.
Can you try the static builds here  https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/3914 ?

It works!

Thanks
hero member
Activity: 812
Merit: 1022
No Maps for These Territories
Hey guys, the linux version doesn't work on centos 6.5 x64. It requires newer version of glibc
I compiled a static version of bitcoind, but still get the same message.

Message is:
--------------------------------
./bitcoind: /usr/lib64/libstdc++.so.6: version `GLIBCXX_3.4.15' not found (required by ./bitcoind)
./bitcoind: /lib64/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.15' not found (required by ./bitcoind)
./bitcoind: /lib64/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.14' not found (required by ./bitcoind)
---------------------------------

Can this be fixed in anyway?

Thanks!
This is a known issue.
Can you try the static builds here  https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/3914 ?
hero member
Activity: 686
Merit: 504
always the student, never the master.
give us back the address pages.
This pages are hidden within File menu

ah thanks. i'm happy now. little confused by the request payment feature, but the improvements are nice to say the least.
legendary
Activity: 854
Merit: 1000
Hey guys, the linux version doesn't work on centos 6.5 x64. It requires newer version of glibc
I compiled a static version of bitcoind, but still get the same message.

Message is:
--------------------------------
./bitcoind: /usr/lib64/libstdc++.so.6: version `GLIBCXX_3.4.15' not found (required by ./bitcoind)
./bitcoind: /lib64/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.15' not found (required by ./bitcoind)
./bitcoind: /lib64/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.14' not found (required by ./bitcoind)
---------------------------------

Can this be fixed in anyway?

Thanks!



newbie
Activity: 15
Merit: 0
I've installed 0.9 on ubuntu 13.10 (copied the files in the archive to /usr/bin)

It's working fine. Though I thought the transaction fee's were lowered to 0.00001 btc. It's the same 0.0001 as before. Did I do something wrong?
legendary
Activity: 2126
Merit: 1001

Thanks again for your help.

In the meantime I compiled with:

Code:
aptitude install automake libdb++-dev libboost-dev
aptitude install libboost-{system,filesystem,chrono,program-options,thread,test}-dev

./autogen.sh
./configure --with-incompatible-bdb
make

Works on Debian.
Take care that your wallet files may be incompatible to other bitcoin-core installations because of the different berkeley db version. Which is no issue for me.

Ente
legendary
Activity: 1232
Merit: 1011
Monero Evangelist
legendary
Activity: 2126
Merit: 1001
I pulled the git, installed "automake", now it complains
Code:
checking for Berkeley DB C++ headers... no
configure: error: libdb_cxx headers missing
..although I have "libdb-dev" installed.

Any hints?

Ente
locate db_cxx.h

then you have different options:

a) fixing directories with symlinks, so configure finds it within the default dirs (/usr/lib and /usr/include)
b) using ./configure flags or BASH settings to specifiy where libs are searched/found
(e.g. something like ./configure BDB_LIBS=/usr/local/db48/lib BDB_CPPFLAGS=-I/usr/local/db48/include)


Thanks pal. It turned out I need "libdb++-dev" instead of "libdb-dev".

One step closer now, next roadblock:

Code:
checking for Berkeley DB C++ headers... default
configure: error: Found Berkeley DB other than 4.8, required for portable wallets (--with-incompatible-bdb to ignore)
There is only v5.1 available on Debian

edit: recompiling with "--with-incompatible-bdb"

Ente
newbie
Activity: 79
Merit: 0
give us back the address pages.
This pages are hidden within File menu
legendary
Activity: 1232
Merit: 1011
Monero Evangelist
I pulled the git, installed "automake", now it complains
Code:
checking for Berkeley DB C++ headers... no
configure: error: libdb_cxx headers missing
..although I have "libdb-dev" installed.

Any hints?

Ente
locate db_cxx.h

then you have different options:

a) fixing directories with symlinks, so configure finds it within the default dirs (/usr/lib and /usr/include)
b) using ./configure flags or BASH settings to specifiy where libs are searched/found
(e.g. something like ./configure BDB_LIBS=/usr/local/db48/lib BDB_CPPFLAGS=-I/usr/local/db48/include)
hero member
Activity: 686
Merit: 504
always the student, never the master.
give us back the address pages.
jr. member
Activity: 266
Merit: 1
Thank you for your hard work.
hero member
Activity: 770
Merit: 500
full member
Activity: 126
Merit: 100
Nice work, thanks and keep it up!
legendary
Activity: 1204
Merit: 1015
are there any no longer used data files at %appdata%/bitcoin that are safe to get rid off for the sake of extra disk space? 

i think i'm seeing 2 blockchains in mine, one in folder 'blocks' that is current and an older chain at the root of %appdata%/bitcoin that stopped updating over a year ago, around 6 gigs. is it safe to dump it?
Yes, you can get rid of that one, but it's just a hard link to a file in the blocks folder, so deleting it doesn't actually free up any space.
member
Activity: 75
Merit: 10
There are some quirks in the Italian translation (and some text which hasn't even been translated).

Where can I report them?


The translations in 0.9.0 release is not the latest on Transifex.
I don't understand why the release team don't pull the latest into the release,
especially some strings are just replaced/updated several weeks before the release.
It annoys me as a translator because it happens several times, and I see half-baked translations in a release.
It could be better that the release schedule includes a period to call for translations,
so developers have a deadline to update strings to be localized,
and translators have a deadline to finish their work.
legendary
Activity: 1050
Merit: 1000
are there any no longer used data files at %appdata%/bitcoin that are safe to get rid off for the sake of extra disk space? 

i think i'm seeing 2 blockchains in mine, one in folder 'blocks' that is current and an older chain at the root of %appdata%/bitcoin that stopped updating over a year ago, around 6 gigs. is it safe to dump it?
hero member
Activity: 821
Merit: 503
question: is the 1 time use btc address per transaction active now in the new 0.9 client?

thanks

Icon





sr. member
Activity: 263
Merit: 250
FYI, the linux binary doesn't run out of the box on CentOS 6 (6.5 fully updated).

./bitcoind -daemon
./bitcoind: /usr/lib64/libstdc++.so.6: version `GLIBCXX_3.4.15' not found (required by ./bitcoind)
./bitcoind: /lib64/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.15' not found (required by ./bitcoind)
./bitcoind: /lib64/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.14' not found (required by ./bitcoind)

EDIT:
I made gitian builds of 0.9.0 that should work on the same operating systems as the 0.8.6 builds.  However the builds in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/3914 might eventually be better if it becomes an official fix.
Pages:
Jump to: