Why do you keep repeating this? Clams were a separate POS alt from minute one. All bitcoin was used for was as a fair way of air dropping it.
Your point being? They could have called it Bitcoin Clams. The point is: They forked with existing balances and without consensus.
Core 0.12 is in beta stage, not stable version. Also if 75% majority of miners choose increase the block limit, you will need wait for Core to add 2 MB patch, with Classic your ready already and Classic 0.12 beta as a copy of the Core is in the work as well.
It is stable enough; about to be released.
I dont agree, Clams merged Bitcoin, Litecoin and Doge as a new PoS coin.
That's not the point.
Classic is just another Bitcoin client fully compatible with all previous and future Bitcoin blocks. The only diference from Core is it allows miners to vote for new bigger block limit, but if no overwhelming majority of miners vote for new limit, we stay at the current one. Bitcoin limit was already changed in the past, and we still call it Bitcoin.
It is compatible because it is not activated. The moment that it gets activated with the set consensus threshold it will cause a network split, effectively splitting the current network into two pieces. The limit change in the past is not comparable to the situation that we have today. The change was within the same client.
The reason you dont agree 75% is enought is just your opinion, consensus, eg 100% cannot exist
No, 75% is not consensus and this has nothing to do with "my opinion". 90-95% (nobody ever talked about 100%) does not make sense only from a game theory perspective (most people here using this as an argument know nothing about it). Let's also not forget the double spend risks and whatnot when two chains co-exist (happened for a short period in 2013).
