I am going to show the correct interpretation once he comes out of his basket.
Got a feeling your in for a long wait. He's busy working on the core which is important. Talking to you isn't important.
Topic: Bitcoin 20MB Fork - page 92. (Read 154787 times)
Got a feeling your in for a long wait. He's busy working on the core which is important. Talking to you isn't important.
Well, you'll be amazed what satoshi really said in that quote and how it is distorted by gavin.
I am going to show the correct interpretation once he comes out of his basket.
I am going to show the correct interpretation once he comes out of his basket.
Go and eat some shit meanwhile!
A sockpuppet is an online identity used for purposes of deception.
Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sockpuppet_%28Internet%29
He has been here a long time, and how contributed to this community with good post, not just endless spam and memes. I think you need to read up a bit on your terms.
Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sockpuppet_%28Internet%29
He has been here a long time, and how contributed to this community with good post, not just endless spam and memes. I think you need to read up a bit on your terms.
How do you know who I am talking about? I didn't say any name, just that there are many sockpuppets (yes, I have read the Wikipedia definition before) in this thread.
Yes, it may be a false assumption.
Well, you'll be amazed what satoshi really said in that quote and how it is distorted by gavin.
I am going to show the correct interpretation once he comes out of his basket.
I am going to show the correct interpretation once he comes out of his basket.
And how on earth can we kill off the 1MB chain, because even if it takes the 1mb chain a year to recover it will still hold the true title of the "original Bitcoin"
Assuming that the 20MB coin got the majority, why would the 1MB need to be killed off? It would just be another altcoin, such as Litecoin etc...
It could never claim the title of "original bitcoin" because it would have a permanent block size cap and bitcoin has never had a permanent block size cap.
Again we need to stop talking about the new chain as the 20MB coin it will be a lot larger then that.
As to your question, I can only ask if the people on this forum have any idea how hard it would be to coordinate all the exchanges and business leaders and miners to switch over all at the same time.
I think it would be foolish to assume everything will just work itself out in any reasonable amount of time. Any confusion or delays could give rise to a media PR disaster and even if 95+% of business leaders agree the new chain is the real Bitcoin we should assume 10% of the Bitcoin community will side with the smaller chain and that could cause prolonged issues.
If we assume the fork is needed to maintain a healthy ecosystem; (and the math dose point in that direction) then how do we stop the blocks from filling up with spam and how do we maintain a network of independent miners if fees are going to drop below a single cent per transaction? And how on earth can we kill off the 1MB chain, because even if it takes the 1mb chain a year to recover it will still hold the true title of the "original Bitcoin" and that is 99% of why Bitcoin has rained as the supreme leader in a sea of alt-coins.
And I recommend the name of this thread be changed to "Bitcoin's 1GB to 20GB Fork" because its clear 20mb is the bare minimum requested by Gavin it was a compromise to get the ball rolling but he wants a lot more then 20MB.
And I recommend the name of this thread be changed to "Bitcoin's 1GB to 20GB Fork" because its clear 20mb is the bare minimum requested by Gavin it was a compromise to get the ball rolling but he wants a lot more then 20MB.
Why should we stop the blocks from filling up with spam? I think that a good pruning method will be developed which will solve the bloatchain issue. This is just a technological challenge, it's nothing impossible.
rename it from 'blockchain' to 'bloatchain'
lmao
lmao
Retard. This can be solved. We only need to put our minds to work instead of throwing with shit like you do. Oh wait you haven't developed/built anything in your life so you have no idea how to do it.
now 1GB would be if we had nations using it as default currency.
lol seriously wtf..
drop teh pipe dude..
Please for all of us on the forum, learn to read and think before you post.
you got nothing, if i would to follow your statement, it would depends on the nation size, network access, etc etc.
you are just throwing 1Gb out of nothing but the thin air your brains are filled with.
please think before posting. or else dont.
And how on earth can we kill off the 1MB chain, because even if it takes the 1mb chain a year to recover it will still hold the true title of the "original Bitcoin"
Assuming that the 20MB coin got the majority, why would the 1MB need to be killed off? It would just be another altcoin, such as Litecoin etc...
It could never claim the title of "original bitcoin" because it would have a permanent block size cap and bitcoin has never had a permanent block size cap.
rename it from 'blockchain' to 'bloatchain'
lmao
lmao
now 1GB would be if we had nations using it as default currency.
lol seriously wtf..
drop teh pipe dude..
If we assume the fork is needed to maintain a healthy ecosystem; (and the math dose point in that direction) then how do we stop the blocks from filling up with spam and how do we maintain a network of independent miners if fees are going to drop below a single cent per transaction? And how on earth can we kill off the 1MB chain, because even if it takes the 1mb chain a year to recover it will still hold the true title of the "original Bitcoin" and that is 99% of why Bitcoin has rained as the supreme leader in a sea of alt-coins.
And I recommend the name of this thread be changed to "Bitcoin's 1GB to 20GB Fork" because its clear 20mb is the bare minimum requested by Gavin it was a compromise to get the ball rolling but he wants a lot more then 20MB.
And I recommend the name of this thread be changed to "Bitcoin's 1GB to 20GB Fork" because its clear 20mb is the bare minimum requested by Gavin it was a compromise to get the ball rolling but he wants a lot more then 20MB.
gavin tested 200MB already..
If we assume the fork is needed to maintain a healthy ecosystem; (and the math dose point in that direction) then how do we stop the blocks from filling up with spam and how do we maintain a network of independent miners if fees are going to drop below a single cent per transaction? And how on earth can we kill off the 1MB chain, because even if it takes the 1mb chain a year to recover it will still hold the true title of the "original Bitcoin" and that is 99% of why Bitcoin has rained as the supreme leader in a sea of alt-coins.
And I recommend the name of this thread be changed to "Bitcoin's 1GB to 20GB Fork" because its clear 20mb is the bear minimum requested by Gavin it was a compromise to get the ball rolling but he wants a lot more then 20MB.
a new BTC will raise in short time. Gavin and Co. will do it. You will have to choose then. it's so simple
If we assume the fork is needed to maintain a healthy ecosystem; (and the math dose point in that direction) then how do we stop the blocks from filling up with spam and how do we maintain a network of independent miners if fees are going to drop below a single cent per transaction? And how on earth can we kill off the 1MB chain, because even if it takes the 1mb chain a year to recover it will still hold the true title of the "original Bitcoin" and that is 99% of why Bitcoin has rained as the supreme leader in a sea of alt-coins.
And I recommend the name of this thread be changed to "Bitcoin's 1GB to 20GB Fork" because its clear 20mb is the bare minimum requested by Gavin it was a compromise to get the ball rolling but he wants a lot more then 20MB.
And I recommend the name of this thread be changed to "Bitcoin's 1GB to 20GB Fork" because its clear 20mb is the bare minimum requested by Gavin it was a compromise to get the ball rolling but he wants a lot more then 20MB.
The amount of sockpuppets is too damn high.
says the sockpuppet
The amount of sockpuppets is too damn high.
Im starting to feel concerned scared for this forum to get bloated with all these spammy troll posts.
We should raise max users subscriptions limit for allowing every purely hypothetical future person to post whether taking a dump or fucking teddy bears.
We should raise max users subscriptions limit for allowing every purely hypothetical future person to post whether taking a dump or fucking teddy bears.
Isn't 'bloat' what bitcoin stands for?
BTC is for 'bloat'
Im starting to feel concerned scared for this forum to get bloated with all these spammy troll posts.
We should raise max users subscriptions limit for allowing every purely hypothetical future person to post whether taking a dump or fucking teddy bears.
We should raise max users subscriptions limit for allowing every purely hypothetical future person to post whether taking a dump or fucking teddy bears.
wow is TBF still running?!
yes, three of them actually
(you must be refering to the exclusive one with the snobs and scammers, the other two are inclusive ones as far as i can see)
...
Note / Disclosure:
I am running for Individual Director seat for the Bitcoin Foundation.
CryptoCoinsNews: https://www.cryptocoinsnews.com/colin-gallagher-bitcoin-foundation-elections/
Note / Disclosure:
I am running for Individual Director seat for the Bitcoin Foundation.
CryptoCoinsNews: https://www.cryptocoinsnews.com/colin-gallagher-bitcoin-foundation-elections/
wow is TBF still running?!
Hello Mrs. Andresen, i'm sorry, your son indicated no seriousness or willingness for a discussion on his point raised. His post made to me the impression of no serious post. I am deeply sorry for pointing it out and for refusing to discuss its content based on the sloppy impression it makes.
Welcome to my ignore list Mrs. Andresen
Welcome to my ignore list Mrs. Andresen
Ok. Now share us with your reason against 20MB blocks. And please ignore the bloatchain reason. Do you have another one?
Jump to: