Topic: Bitcoin Acceptance. - page 12. (Read 2400 times)
If you are expecting it to be accepted by the government and it will be imposing taxes in the future I think is there. If it is approved by all nations in the world, I believe it will be the strongest and well-developed virtual currency and influence on the multinational economy. The level of taxation can be adjusted downward. , creating the best conditions for investors.
If Bitcoin is accepted, its anonymity remains unchanged, I think it is essential for the future development of Bitcoin. Everyone loves the bitcoin very much like being accepted as a Fiat and being global racing. I really want the bitcoin to be accepted internationally.
Before the bitcoin is accepted there will be some way to go. The blockchain offers a lot of possibilities and facilitates in the future. This will surely have a positive influence on many areas (health, technology ...). Before all this happens, we will have to work much more safely. It is one of the pillars for success. The scams will have to disappear and they will be able to invest more easily.
I don't agree, if bitcoin is accepted on that condition. then bitcoin is not a decentralized technology. the purpose of Bitcoin is made to eliminate centralized control. and users are free to use their assets without rules restrictions. then if bitcoin follows fiat rules and others by the government. Bitcoin doesn't work on the way.
Totally agree with you. Bitcoin won't be what it should be when it is not decentralized. I want bitcoin to be decentralized forever. But when some one talks with me about the crimes an be dome using bitcoin. I have no answer.
If bitcoin were to be accepted, on the condition that it should be regulated. Do you think it should be done, disregarding its decentralized nature?
Regulating Bitcoin may have its own advantages. At least some of the common frauds or scams can easily be tracked or prevented. If that is the only condition for general bitcoin acceptance, I think I am cool with it. 
If bitcoin were to be accepted, on the condition that it should be regulated. Do you think it should be done, disregarding its decentralized nature?
I have no problems with the regulation of Bitcoins rather I even accept it because it prevents the use of the currency for criminal purposes and it's even better that it's regulated because should they ban it, the repercussion will be very bad.
Just us as long as whatever regulation is made can still preserve the features and advantages of bitcoin, that should be okay in my opinion. Regulation may just be security policies, right? The decentralized feature of bitcoin is its best feature, so there should be no attempt to alter that.
I don't agree, if bitcoin is accepted on that condition. then bitcoin is not a decentralized technology. the purpose of Bitcoin is made to eliminate centralized control. and users are free to use their assets without rules restrictions. then if bitcoin follows fiat rules and others by the government. Bitcoin doesn't work on the way.
Accepted by who? There is already a large, enthusiastic community supporting the goal and targets of bitcoin.
Regulation isn't necessary for growth or mass global adoption, this would happen naturally as more people become aware of the potential and possibilities. And decentralization is what makes bitcoin a suitable alternative to fiat.
Regulation isn't necessary for growth or mass global adoption, this would happen naturally as more people become aware of the potential and possibilities. And decentralization is what makes bitcoin a suitable alternative to fiat.
Yes, regulation isnt necessary. But it would significantly accelerate the growth of popularity of bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies, but at the same time it would put an end to the huge incomes from these assets.
If bitcoin were to be accepted, on the condition that it should be regulated. Do you think it should be done, disregarding its decentralized nature?
actually crypto currency receipts can all accept if all countries accept crypto currencies as the currency that applies to crypto currencies created as technological development demands and the era of economic development must also follow it in my opinion crypto currency will be acceptable because it follows the development of technology 
Without regulation, it will simply have no future.He will not give the road and just block the oxygen.The decentralized nature will always leave it on the other side of the law.Few States would agree to cooperate on such terms.There is no need to be afraid of legalization and centralization.They will not harm Bitcoin's activity in any way.
Accepted by who? There is already a large, enthusiastic community supporting the goal and targets of bitcoin.
Regulation isn't necessary for growth or mass global adoption, this would happen naturally as more people become aware of the potential and possibilities. And decentralization is what makes bitcoin a suitable alternative to fiat.
accepted by more and more people and government. people will have good understanding about bitcoin and start to enter them. secondly, government will accept bitcoin as a legal currency Regulation isn't necessary for growth or mass global adoption, this would happen naturally as more people become aware of the potential and possibilities. And decentralization is what makes bitcoin a suitable alternative to fiat.
Cryptocurrency or bitcoin already accepted. About disregarding decentralized nature, The government should form a governing body who has the authority for centralized bitcoin.
Monitoring all activities like investing and trading and protecting users and investors from hacking.
The regulation should be based where the cryptocurrency receives negative publicity, and banned those illegal doers, and laws for better stability.
Monitoring all activities like investing and trading and protecting users and investors from hacking.
The regulation should be based where the cryptocurrency receives negative publicity, and banned those illegal doers, and laws for better stability.
Millions of people use cryptos and Bitcoin already and the nunber is increasing.
Bitcoin is so much superior to the US dollar, there's no comparison. It is traceable, impossible to steal without leaving a trace, it's decentralized and you can run your own bank at home.
Bitcoin is so much superior to the US dollar, there's no comparison. It is traceable, impossible to steal without leaving a trace, it's decentralized and you can run your own bank at home.
I hope it never happens. Otherwise, bitcoin will lose its main feature, which has become one of the key factors of its success - decentarilization. However, time will show how things will actually be. I hope bitcoin will cope with the state pressure.
There are a large number of crypto-currency exchanges on which bitcoin is traded, but you need to choose the service carefully, not all are reliable, and some can very fail.
This is a very difficult question. For someone the official permission of the government to bitcoin to increase confidence in him. For someone bitcoin will lose its main feature in the case of regulation by the state. And I rather belong to the second category. Bitcoin needs to remain decentralized.
Of course, this will be a violation of all the principles of bitcoin. But on the other hand, it will enable cryptocurrency to develop officially. I think that if the government finds the right approach to regulation, it will not violate the decentralization of bitcoin.
If bitcoin is tuned to be legitimate and recognized by governments then I think it's an impossible thing because if bitcoin adjusts then it will lose many of its great functions. Bitcoin will no longer be bitcoin if it is managed from someone.
i think bitcoins is the future of digital currency and bitcoins will be the future currency
Jump to: