Topic: Bitcoin anarchy in need of some rules | NY Post (Read 4250 times)

Classic. Put that on a T-Shirt.

If you judge our current global economic situation according to history and logic, and not the P-R campaigns, then regulation leads to a very small number of corrupt wealthy elites manipulating financial markets for incredible amount of personal profit.

I'll take no regulation please.

It’s not that regulation makes the drug war 100% successful or that officials involved cannot be corrupted but provides a tool to lessen the impact.

Drugs are not the only thing an unregulated barter system like Bitcoin are perfectly suited for or currently used to promote. I can think of many unsavory situations where money needs to change hands and Bitcoin + TOR would work well. Silk Road isn’t the only one. Bitcoin is well suited for child prostitution, pornography, assassination, arms dealers, bribery, extortion payments, kickback, money laundering, tax evasion and hidden payments for any number of other barbaric savageries toward society. It’s not as if you can’t use other forms of payment for these evil acts but why make a payment system perfectly suited to them?

Oh, and please don’t tell me your freshly learned Poli Sci/Sociology/Philosophy 101 bullshit preached by a professor that’s never held a real job in his life and has no children. He has the luxury of believing the anarchistic nonsense. The rest of us have to live in the real world and would like our children to grow up without being molested or given drugs by the guy down the street (shipped straight to his home from SR).

Mainstream media is mostly just a circus, or vultures running for the next cadaver to feast on. The masses buy into the hype and entertainment, I would think..

am in contact with Australian government i will report back as soon as i get any information, have been busy the last few weeks with other things otherwise i would already have something

Wasn't that same media yelling "gold" as a safe heaven almost everyday? Now they're promoting gold is not safe at all. And I totally agree with your fiat/BTC trade analysis. If we remove fiat from exchanges, there will be no talk about regulation or something.

Good post. Govts will eventually want to regulate everything though..

This argument is retarded: regulation of the exchanges has nothing to do with Bitcoin and everything to do with fiat money. FinCEN published guidelines on the exchanges because they trade fiat money for Bitcoins. Both people interviewed oversee operations involving trading fiat money for Bitcoins. The government already regulates fiat money so why would they stop just because you want to trade fiat money for bitcoins?

Bitcoin isn't special in this regard and just because the fiat side of it is/will/should be regulated doesn't mean that Bitcoin is/will/should be regulated.

#1 mistake of media is failing to distinguish bitcoin exchanges from the currency itself, and that's because they struggle to understand the concept that something can exist without a traditional "entity" owning or controlling it .

Completely agree.  The market will be regulated, and I want the regulators to be us.

This is completely correct. I also see the same horseshit happening in my country (Norway). People who for whatever reason have something bad happening to them, calls out for regulation. Recently, a lot of investors who trusted their banks blindly to create loans in 'low-risk' investments sued one of the biggest banks here, because they lost a lot of money. If they had made a lot of money, of course they would not have sued...

The court ruled that the bank had deceived the investors, and thus needed to pay them back. Personally I think that a person is responsible for any investments that he/she does, but at the same time it is really bad when somebody is less than honest about the prospects of a certain investment as well.

I can't imagine how naive it is to just trust a banker to act in your best interest. They only act in their own interest.

At the same time I see this all the time, people fuck up, and then instead of admitting to the fault, taking responsibility, they have a too big ego or lack a spine, and point at whoever they think they can put the blame on.

The fact is that an individual always have 100% responsibility for everything that this individual does. If one does an investment without knowing what one invests in, but simply trusts someone else that it is a good investment, then one cannot blame anybody but oneself when it turns out to be a bad investment.

First, when an individual takes 100% responsibility for his own actions, then he is truly free and strong.

If your into Bitcoin and want regulation and the nanny state to watch over your Bitcoin economy, then your of low intelligence plain and simple.

The entire idea of Bitcoin and what Satoshi wanted is a independent decentralized system that needs no big brother.

Please remember that those who want regulation are in a position to profit from the regulation. Please don't be stupid and agree to this rubbish, yeah a lack of regulation might get us burnt every now and then but thats a worthwhile price to pay for freedom.

Saying no go government regulation does not excuse you from the responsibility of regulation. The community must figure out how to regulate itself which means it probably needs some elected governing body or some form of regulation in the form of the protocol and code.

There is a good point which was made in the article though. We do need self regulation of some sort and there is a lack of experts. The people running these exchanges don't know what they are doing. But how do we regulate it in a libertarian way?

Being libertarian doesn't mean no regulation, the regulation has to be designed into the protocol somehow. How do we do it internally?

Can't we just make our own foundation and lure (bribe) Gavin to it? Then these other directors and their corporations can regulate themselves all they want while the rest of us decentralize their services so they are redundant

Probably whoever paid him is who he wants regulating Bitcoin.

If the Federal Reserve ever would accept bitcoin as superior to fiat, they would not buy into bitcoin but create and mine their own alt-coin where they decide the inflation rate and other parameters.

What the hell bullshit is this?!? The whole entire point of bitcoin is a worldwide, free market. If he supports regulation, why is not he involved in Fiat to Fiat Exchange? Then he can get regulated as much as his little heart desires. Leave me out of that.

I don't know if it's just the media, but I read an article today saying alot of people who invested in bitcoin wanted to see regulation after the crash, because basically, (I am paraphrasing here) they don't like loosing money. Sounds like some sore loosers. I can't imagine this this true - but if it is, it's a sad day for our community and probably humanity. We work hard to create a free market so we can prosper, take charge of our own lives, and live in freedom together then the instant there is one minor setback people go crying to mommy government for help and protection. Those who made/lost money in the recent volatility have only themselves to hold responsible. It's not government's responsibility to keep us safe from ourselves! I just cannot believe what I am reading!

What is it going to take to get away from these damn people who seem to crave government control over their life? A FTL space craft and a new planet? Even then, 200-300 years later... guess where that society will be. Unless some level of sustainable common sense culture can be created, I fear they'll be a bunch of whining ninnies seeking to give up personal responsibility too. It must be human nature. The U.S. constitution was good and we had a good run. Guess I should be thankful for that, but eventually corruption finds its way into everything. The problem with everything at this point in history is there is no choice for people who desire freedom. I don't have a problem with communism, socialism, dictatorships etc... I simply do not want to live under them. I recognize everyone has different ideas on how to live, and those who desire "stability" and "safety" (even from themselves) can go to a location where the government will "provide" that for them. Fine. But what is making me disenchanted, especially with continuing globalization and increased regulation of personal life in the United States (Think illegal > 16oz drinks in NY etc), is there is nowhere truly free left to go.

I sure hope our society does not totally collapse in on itself before space technology gets to a usable point, and brings choice back into our lives. We may be getting ready to enter a new set of dark ages and I fear suppression will mean centuries before anything like that happens, sadly. Bitcoin, the Open Source movement, and things of that nature do provide some optimism and we can "win".... except for the fact that it does appear we don't want to?

Anyone read the book "The Giver?" Nuff Said.

Governments are welcome to regulate bitcoin prices but only with buying or selling bitcoins.
The USA could buy some bitcoins reserves.
This bitcoin reserves could be used for bitcoin stabilization and later when the bitcoin market volume will increase could be used like gold reserves to stabilize the dollar.
I would recommend for the US government to buy at least 1 million bitcoins, for Russia and China each a half of million.
 

In 1913, a bunch of ultra-rich business men convinced (corrupted) the US Govt to create the Federal Reserve wich is their private property (the business men).  Their main argument was that giving them the power over money creation will bring stability.  The US economy then became very unstable.  Crash after crash, the Federal Reserve owner are just going richer and richer at the cost of all citizen.  Look to the history of "the money changers".. The history of gold, silver, banks.. Tons of examples lies in the past that clearly shows that regulation has done no good at all.  If we cant learn from the past, we are doomed to fail.

Regulation ?  ok Gox, begins by regulating yourself, then be regulated by some "authority", then you'll see what the market will do !  You may be really surprised !

Agreed - but now there will be internal unrest in the foundation. Seems like there are differing viewpoints here.