With the quality of the art and the speed to generate the image after the request (approx 1-2 min depending on the server load) I can see that soon the digital artists will be replaced by AI.
You can send a request with a description and voilà, you get your piece done in 1-2 min, in addition you get a few different versions you can choose from.
Topic: Bitcoin art created by AI {gallery} ... and the satoshi portrait as well. (Read 744 times)
October 17, 2022, 10:54:59 PM
October 16, 2022, 10:46:57 PM
Other people may seem to view A.I as a tool that will aid artists to do their job more efficiently especially to those who are veteran in the field, which will make them stand out among others, but as a young artist this thing creeps me out, and there's this feeling that anytime soon, when computer became more sentient, artist like me can be easily replaced
September 08, 2022, 02:53:14 AM
Unfortunately, based on my experience in life, those who cheat they succeed in life. (look at all the politics for instance). Life isn't fair and many artists will suffer if they do not adopt the new technique in the future. If you create art for business, this will be the main tool to use, but the prices for the work done will be lower and the real artists will be affected because
- First, there not so much work do be done after a piece is generated for 1-2 min.
- Second, more and more "artists" emerge and will use the AI and just make the final touches in chasing the quick money. If you generate an artwork for 2 min. and use 1-2 hours to final touch it, for sure you can lower the price below the one the avarage artist which will use at least a week to do the same art piece and he will expect to get a good return for the time he has invested in his work.
The AI is great, but there will be consequences for some people.
- First, there not so much work do be done after a piece is generated for 1-2 min.
- Second, more and more "artists" emerge and will use the AI and just make the final touches in chasing the quick money. If you generate an artwork for 2 min. and use 1-2 hours to final touch it, for sure you can lower the price below the one the avarage artist which will use at least a week to do the same art piece and he will expect to get a good return for the time he has invested in his work.
The AI is great, but there will be consequences for some people.
September 04, 2022, 06:38:42 AM
I agree with that.
Limiting the discussion to “competitions” (might also be true for paintings on commission), it also might be easier to master the use of AI than master the painting technique. Unfair advantage.
Exactly! Not only for competitions though, but also for digital artists who spent thousands of hours just to get a corporate job. And I fear that there will come a time where companies would rather pay an artist who can create a piece that's close to being a "masterwork" within minutes than commissioning an artist who will create a piece of artwork in a month. Limiting the discussion to “competitions” (might also be true for paintings on commission), it also might be easier to master the use of AI than master the painting technique. Unfair advantage.
September 04, 2022, 06:19:39 AM
Interesting to see more and more of these. I even read that one AI art won a contest submitted as a prank, and made a lot of people angry.
To be fair, NFT art and so-called AI generated art with NFTs really made people go crazy over it and I didn't get it at the time, but I guess I never got art in the first place.
Seems a bit sad for me to see Bitcoin art like this though. No meaning behind it, just an algorithm.
To be fair, NFT art and so-called AI generated art with NFTs really made people go crazy over it and I didn't get it at the time, but I guess I never got art in the first place.
Seems a bit sad for me to see Bitcoin art like this though. No meaning behind it, just an algorithm.
September 04, 2022, 02:34:26 AM
but it's in no way a threat to human artists.
Unfortunately, I have to disagree with that... Such things give an unfair advantage to some of the so-called artists while it makes "true artists" suffer in multiple ways [e.g. time-based competitions]I agree with that.
Limiting the discussion to “competitions” (might also be true for paintings on commission), it also might be easier to master the use of AI than master the painting technique. Unfair advantage.
September 04, 2022, 02:27:10 AM
but it's in no way a threat to human artists.
Unfortunately, I have to disagree with that... Such things give an unfair advantage to some of the so-called artists while it makes "true artists" suffer in multiple ways [e.g. time-based competitions] and it's worth noting that someone already took advantage of Midjourney by entering in a competition [I don't think it's going to end in there]: An AI-Generated Artwork Won First Place at a State Fair Fine Arts Competition, and Artists Are Pissed August 30, 2022, 09:30:07 PM
This is acutally good for art in general. Artists protest that art created by AI is not art, and to some extent, I agree (if we consider the emotional aspect of art) but it's in no way a threat to human artists. In fact, it puts more value on human made art. Also, for years there has been generic "art" made by people that is in no way more "artistic" than the AI made.
You might be right:In the end, digital photography, where everyone makes thousands of photographs every months, put an end to artistic photography? No.
The artistic value remains intact.
So the artistic value of an human made painting couldn’t be challenged by thousands of artistic valuable AI generated paintings.
August 29, 2022, 06:59:08 AM
This is acutally good for art in general. Artists protest that art created by AI is not art, and to some extent, I agree (if we consider the emotional aspect of art) but it's in no way a threat to human artists. In fact, it puts more value on human made art. Also, for years there has been generic "art" made by people that is in no way more "artistic" than the AI made.
August 29, 2022, 06:40:01 AM
I generally see no use case of the NFTs except for the game industry, or some small groups of collectors. Those projects who were issued back in 2017/18 could be only for collectors interest but everything else is just a bullshit speculations riding the wave, like the ICOs shitshow back in 2017/18.
I doubt that 1% of all those ICOs from back them actually exists.
It was just a scammer's machine to print money. Same here.. everyone is pushing "metaverse" as a real future, but everything is just to fool some lost souls.
Many were addicted to Second Life, the game. It was interesting, but after a few years it lost the momentum.
I doubt that 1% of all those ICOs from back them actually exists.
It was just a scammer's machine to print money. Same here.. everyone is pushing "metaverse" as a real future, but everything is just to fool some lost souls.
Many were addicted to Second Life, the game. It was interesting, but after a few years it lost the momentum.
August 29, 2022, 04:28:53 AM
You could easily sell this as NFTs and given the aesthetics of NFT market, I think that this is in the right spot where it looks good but at the same time it's profitable. This is the first time I've heard of Midjourney, I'm more familiar with Dall-E with it's captcha like image generation format.
NFT market is going to be swept by this innovation. A LOT of the current NFT market is just a bunch of auto-generated jpg’s with random permutations of standard parts.
I can see an AI NFT generator doing permutation of standard prompts (words used to generate images).
August 29, 2022, 02:30:31 AM
Why? How can them sue? For example, Dalle2,doesn’t permit generating images with celebrities, while Midjourney and Stable diffusion allows that.
I have serious doubt about the fact they copyrighted material must not be included in the training set of an AI.
the chances of getting sued are probably very small but they do exist. also keep in mind just because you get sued doesn't mean you are guilty. but it does make for a possible pain in the ass.
I am no legal expert here, but I bet ToC agreement are pretty clear about what you can, and cannot do with these softwares. Also not to be excluded the celebrity could sue the “software” (whatever it means) instead of the users (I have seen crazy things lately on this…).
And, yeas, being sued is a pain in the ass, and not a cheap one.
August 28, 2022, 09:14:33 PM
Why? How can them sue? For example, Dalle2,doesn’t permit generating images with celebrities, while Midjourney and Stable diffusion allows that.
I have serious doubt about the fact they copyrighted material must not be included in the training set of an AI.
the chances of getting sued are probably very small but they do exist. also keep in mind just because you get sued doesn't mean you are guilty. but it does make for a possible pain in the ass.
August 27, 2022, 10:52:59 PM
I am not über technical (also) on this particular field. But I guess the images used to train the neural network aren’t directly used to build the image, or at least not in a recognisable way…
just because it's not a "recognizable" way how do you even define that term technically? you can't just get copyrighted pictures of google images and let it use those in anyway unless they got permission from the copyright holders. i would imagine a celebrity could sue anyone using their images in an unauthorized fashion. if they turned up in any "generated" works.
Why? How can them sue? For example, Dalle2,doesn’t permit generating images with celebrities, while Midjourney and Stable diffusion allows that.
I have serious doubt about the fact they copyrighted material must not be included in the training set of an AI.
August 27, 2022, 09:17:07 PM
I am not über technical (also) on this particular field. But I guess the images used to train the neural network aren’t directly used to build the image, or at least not in a recognisable way…
just because it's not a "recognizable" way how do you even define that term technically? you can't just get copyrighted pictures of google images and let it use those in anyway unless they got permission from the copyright holders. i would imagine a celebrity could sue anyone using their images in an unauthorized fashion. if they turned up in any "generated" works.
August 27, 2022, 07:23:17 PM
In addition to the description of the image, you can use some “command” to define the type of picture you want, the engine used, the startle of the render and other commands.
I find very useful to see how others got to their results to play with our creations.
but its really not creating anything as much as it is just matching text to a database of images from the real world. then it does some type of processing on them. that's about it i would think. so whoever owns the original images put into the database probably has a claim on any derived works from it.
I am not über technical (also) on this particular field. But I guess the images used to train the neural network aren’t directly used to build the image, or at least not in a recognisable way…
August 27, 2022, 07:03:02 PM
In addition to the description of the image, you can use some “command” to define the type of picture you want, the engine used, the startle of the render and other commands.
I find very useful to see how others got to their results to play with our creations.
but its really not creating anything as much as it is just matching text to a database of images from the real world. then it does some type of processing on them. that's about it i would think. so whoever owns the original images put into the database probably has a claim on any derived works from it.
August 25, 2022, 06:54:02 AM
Would be cool if you also wrote the prompts (the words you gave it to create the image)
~
~
Most of the words are in the name of the file of the pictures I posted. If you open the image files in a new tab you see them
August 23, 2022, 07:02:08 AM
Would be cool if you also wrote the prompts (the words you gave it to create the image)
Tried it a few weeks as well ...
Prompt: satoshi nakamoto bitcoin creator
Prompt: satoshi nakamoto bitcoin blockchain cryptocurrencies
Prompt: privacy
Tried it a few weeks as well ...
Prompt: satoshi nakamoto bitcoin creator
Prompt: satoshi nakamoto bitcoin blockchain cryptocurrencies
Prompt: privacy
August 21, 2022, 11:45:33 PM
There was also this image from a discussion here:
https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/wrwmet/dalle_prompt_an_ancient_roman_sestertius_with_a/
And it was AI image was developed using Dall-E, https://openai.com/
https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/wrwmet/dalle_prompt_an_ancient_roman_sestertius_with_a/
And it was AI image was developed using Dall-E, https://openai.com/
Jump to: