Pages:
Author

Topic: Bitcoin Classic = a bunch of idiots running the full node - page 2. (Read 2291 times)

legendary
Activity: 1582
Merit: 1006
beware of your keys.
If Bitcoin core implements the 2MB block size within two months, there is no need for bitcoinclassic. But will Core do that?
something you need to understand that the bitcoin core is not being changed just because of the biased factor, if bitcoin core just changed into XT one for biased reason, then bitcoin core would not likely be trusted by the users anymore. Huh
legendary
Activity: 3248
Merit: 1070
If Bitcoin core implements the 2MB block size within two months, there is no need for bitcoinclassic. But will Core do that?

their target for segwit, which is basically the 2mb implementation for core, is around april, you can see the roadmap bitcoin.org
sr. member
Activity: 689
Merit: 269
What a shame to miss amazing post from franky1
legendary
Activity: 4424
Merit: 4794
If Bitcoin core implements the 2MB block size within two months, there is no need for bitcoinclassic. But will Core do that?

+1
needs to be answered..

as i think most users dont care about what band camp the devs belong to as long as CODE progresses and CODE has nothing nefarious.

i personally dont care about the emotions of the dev's.. as long as their emotions dont put anything bad into the code, bt do put positive features into the code. things that users want..
full member
Activity: 174
Merit: 100
If Bitcoin core implements the 2MB block size within two months, there is no need for bitcoinclassic. But will Core do that?

There is no need to raise the block size to 2MB now thanks to segregated witness, try again. Bitcoin works perfectly ok, wtf are you implying, that Core wants to kill Bitcoin or something? get a grip man, just pay the recommended fees, surely it is better than risking an unnecessary hard fork and centralizing nodes? Don't you realize node count is already low as it is today? Hello? anyone here with common sense?

If the Core developers had common sence they would:

1) Include in Core only features where super majority support is for
2) Made proper fix of transaction mallebeality in hardfork together with blocksize limit increase

Neither of this happening, and all they can think of is just crappy workaround with SegWit. If they were working as employers of a company, responsible for this would be fired already. Because unrational and big eggo guys inside Core blocking the way how open decentralized development should be done, there is no other option than choose better repo representing Bitcoin.
legendary
Activity: 1162
Merit: 1004
Greg and Peter will quit, and im sure others will follow, the Classic leeches will have nothing to keep copy-pasting onto their fork in order to progress, therefore you are left with a bunch of incompetent idiots running the full node,


LOL

https://bitco.in/forum/threads/gold-collapsing-bitcoin-up.16/page-273#post-10117
sr. member
Activity: 689
Merit: 269
These classic teapots have no idea what they are doing.
legendary
Activity: 3542
Merit: 1965
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
The name calling and finger pointing are not necessary for Bitcoin to grow and develop. We have had enough of that already and it is time to stand together against a bigger problem in the form of R3 and other companies wanting to develop all these Blockchains.

Let's just join together and look for ways to accept our differences and what we need from Bitcoin and then concentrate on that goal.   
hero member
Activity: 1106
Merit: 521
And bitcoin core just keeps chugging on doing what its ment to...........  Wink
legendary
Activity: 1358
Merit: 1014
If Bitcoin core implements the 2MB block size within two months, there is no need for bitcoinclassic. But will Core do that?

There is no need to raise the block size to 2MB now thanks to segregated witness, try again. Bitcoin works perfectly ok, wtf are you implying, that Core wants to kill Bitcoin or something? get a grip man, just pay the recommended fees, surely it is better than risking an unnecessary hard fork and centralizing nodes? Don't you realize node count is already low as it is today? Hello? anyone here with common sense?
full member
Activity: 201
Merit: 100
If Bitcoin core implements the 2MB block size within two months, there is no need for bitcoinclassic. But will Core do that?
legendary
Activity: 1358
Merit: 1014
Greg and Peter will quit, and im sure others will follow, the Classic leeches will have nothing to keep copy-pasting onto their fork in order to progress, therefore you are left with a bunch of incompetent idiots running the full node, only in hopes of paying a little bit less fees for the fantastic tradeoff of increased node centralization and amateur developers with sneaky intentions (be ready for shit like this once the HF happens:

http://cointelegraph.com/news/115153/bitcoin-xt-fork-can-blacklist-tor-exits-may-reveal-users-ip-addresses
)

Good job R3CEV!!!!!! Classic right in time to save the day.
Pages:
Jump to: