Well - finally we get trolled (as is to be expected on such a forum as this).
So we say "goodbye" to all the trolls by locking the topic (yes - sorry - you will need to create your own topiics if you want to try and keep on trolling me).
Topic: "Bitcoin Classic" is a classic attempt at a hostile takeover (Read 8104 times)
<>
I'm almost sure those remittance companies all speculate on FOREX to maximize their gain, so they can afford cutting their fee if there is some competition. And most of the competition for them today is coming from online payment. I often see people buying/selling bitcoin using mobile payment at localbitcoins to do international remittance, that still costs less than WU if he knows how to put a limit order on localbitcoins
I'm almost sure those remittance companies all speculate on FOREX to maximize their gain, so they can afford cutting their fee if there is some competition. And most of the competition for them today is coming from online payment. I often see people buying/selling bitcoin using mobile payment at localbitcoins to do international remittance, that still costs less than WU if he knows how to put a limit order on localbitcoins
Please read this first: https://medium.com/@Cryptonight/bitcoin-doesn-t-make-remittances-cheaper-eb5f437849fe#.uizq282l7
Offers some insight into the costs of remittance.
Again, what you're doing has nothing to do with that.
Just like they said, they want to mimic the traditional money remittance service thus failed. I also provide remittance service but I only targeting online solutions. I have to teach each of the user to go to online exchanges at local place and open account, but once that step is done, the cost saving can start to kick in
Cash to cash can also be done, but then you have to setup a local agency specially to do cash trades, like localbitcoin cash trading advertise, then the cost is down to 1-2%. You can not just use existing cash transfer network, then you end up with the same cost as them
Funniest extortion attempt ever. 
What exactly is your problem?
There is nothing funny about what you are saying at all - are you trying to have a go at me?
I have no idea if he lied, conceded the point for brevity. I also have no idea if you have a waifu, but that "she's holding the forum coin hostage, and won't let me have it back untill you do what I say" bit was hilarious. Makes you 110% trustworthy & credible in my eyes
So your strategy is to just keep on repeating that.
Do you think you are going to make me angry?
Personally I feel sorry for you - as why would anyone bother to waste their time doing what you are doing unless they are paid something for it which would also indicate that you must be very poor.
My strategy is to answer your questions. Should I try a different tack?
I have no idea if he lied, conceded the point for brevity. I also have no idea if you have a waifu, but that "she's holding the forum coin hostage, and won't let me have it back untill you do what I say" bit was hilarious. Makes you 110% trustworthy & credible in my eyes
So your strategy is to just keep on repeating that.
Do you think you are going to make me angry?
Personally I feel sorry for you - as why would anyone bother to waste their time doing what you are doing unless they are paid something for it - which would also indicate that you must be very poor (as I doubt anyone would be paying that much to troll me).
Hmm.. exactly how does this post actually contribute anything at all?
How does that relevant to my being paid?
Seriously. Frankie lied about having source (lol, VB), and you? You lied about a wifu holding 50 BTC of forum funds hostage, which she refused to release until you got your way. Idk, hard to say which one of you is moar credible
So you agree that he lied and now you want to bring in a completely different issue to do with my wife to excuse him for lying?
Interesting.
I have no idea if he lied, conceded the point for brevity. I also have no idea if you have a waifu, but that "she's holding the forum coin hostage, and won't let me have it back untill you do what I say" bit was hilarious. Makes you 110% trustworthy & credible in my eyes
That's just lambie. He does that for fun.
Hmm.. exactly how does this post actually contribute anything at all?
You keep talking about paid tolls. I'm just being curious. Can you present proof of this?
Just look at the poster I am replying to above if you need proof.
That's just lambie. He does that for fun.
You keep talking about paid tolls. I'm just being curious. Can you present proof of this?
Just look at the poster I am replying to above if you need proof.
Seriously. Frankie lied about having source (lol, VB), and you? You lied about a wifu holding 50 BTC of forum funds hostage, which she refused to release until you got your way. Idk, hard to say which one of you is moar credible
So you agree that he lied and now you want to bring in a completely different issue to do with my wife to excuse him for lying?
Interesting.
I agree. I've always thought he was full of crap. They didn't move it as far as I can tell, they deleted it.
I think it was moved to a Reputation sub-forum (which wasn't really what I had wanted but fine if it needs to be like that then that is how it is).
Perhaps those that are paying posters think that they can just wear us down - but I will not be worn down in that way. If you post nonsense then I am going to call it nonsense!
You keep talking about paid trolls. I'm just being curious. Can you present proof of this?
Lol, my approach is to respond in kind. You sidestepped the real issue, and latched onto Frankie's credibility, but now that your own credibility is brought up, you get sulky?
Seriously?
Is that the best that you can come up with?
@franky1 claimed to have source code he doesn't have (and that is now a fact until he posts the code to show otherwise) - what exactly have you *discovered* about my credibility?
Seriously. Frankie lied about having source (lol, VB), and you? You lied about your wifu holding 50 BTC of forum funds hostage, which she refused to release until you got your way. Idk, hard to say which one of you is moar credible
Hint (for people wanting to attack CIYAM).
#1 - Get your facts straight.
#2 - Don't post bullshit.
#3 - Try again (because you must have screwed up with one of the above).
#1 - Get your facts straight.
#2 - Don't post bullshit.
#3 - Try again (because you must have screwed up with one of the above).
Lol, my approach is to respond in kind. You sidestepped the real issue, and latched onto Frankie's credibility, but now that your own credibility is brought up, you get sulky?
Seriously?
Is that the best that you can come up with?
@franky1 claimed to have source code he doesn't have (and that is now a fact until he posts the code to show otherwise) - what exactly have you *discovered* about my credibility?
I see - so your approach is to "attack the person" is it?
Probably that is because you have nothing else of any substance to contribute - or do you?
(let's see if you can actually show you have any intelligence at all)
Lol, my approach is to respond in kind. You sidestepped the real issue, and latched onto Frankie's credibility, but now that your own credibility is brought up, you get sulky?
http://s29.postimg.org/chg400u6f/baww.jpg
The main difference between Bitcoin Core and Classic is the 2MB block size. If Core can implement the 2MB block size, there is no need for Classic to exist.
The both have the same effective blocksize.. Stop spreading misinformation.
I see - so your approach is to "attack the person" is it?
Probably that is because you have nothing else of any substance to contribute - or do you?
(let's see if you can actually show you have any intelligence at all - personally I doubt that you do but we could make a bet if you want)
So Ian is challenging the Cunt to a showdown.
The main difference between Bitcoin Core and Classic is the 2MB block size. If Core can implement the 2MB block size, there is no need for Classic to exist.
^You gentlemen should probably get a room, I'm blushing...
I have apologised for getting your friend (@franky1) in trouble so I expect he'll be fine tomorrow.
Would it surprise you to know that he's not my friend?
Just found it a bit curious that someone with your track record would harp on credibility
Jump to: