Pages:
Author

Topic: BitCoin COP - We need them [NSFW] - page 3. (Read 9775 times)

member
Activity: 70
Merit: 10
Writer $0.10/word +
January 30, 2014, 04:20:55 PM
#16
Oh no, she gonna abreast me!
legendary
Activity: 2072
Merit: 1049
┴puoʎǝq ʞool┴
January 30, 2014, 01:59:37 PM
#15
Agree.
legendary
Activity: 2282
Merit: 1204
The revolution will be digital
January 30, 2014, 01:16:24 PM
#14
I don't trust anyone who calls Bitcoin "BitCoin".
Ditto. I see it way too much today. Learn how to spell, seriously.

Oh ...i dint know the word 'BitCoin' is now a part of Oxford dictionary... I pitty u
sr. member
Activity: 476
Merit: 251
COINECT
January 30, 2014, 10:26:47 AM
#13
I think we need a decentralized, opt-in system of transaction reversibility but that's just me.
sr. member
Activity: 450
Merit: 250
January 30, 2014, 09:00:34 AM
#12
I see the people who are actually discussing this, have completely missed the point of the thread.

Therefore, I declare them as being off-topic, and should be banned. Smiley

=squeak=
legendary
Activity: 1148
Merit: 1010
In Satoshi I Trust
January 28, 2014, 07:33:46 PM
#11
Z1#
newbie
Activity: 22
Merit: 0
January 28, 2014, 07:26:39 PM
#10
How about an anonymous decentralized contract for their heads.........well maybe not.  Roll Eyes
hero member
Activity: 854
Merit: 658
rgbkey.github.io/pgp.txt
January 28, 2014, 07:08:00 PM
#9
I don't trust anyone who calls Bitcoin "BitCoin".
Ditto. I see it way too much today. Learn how to spell, seriously.
legendary
Activity: 2282
Merit: 1204
The revolution will be digital
January 28, 2014, 05:56:13 PM
#8
I am deadly against blacklisting any coin, because that goes Satoshi's basic fungibility concept. But we can consider blacklisting addresses, just like we blacklist IP addresses for their notorious character. It does not mean those IP addresses are outside internet, similarly those Bitcoin addresses wont be outside the Bitcoin protocol. Only people will know that they are scammer/thief and deal with their own risk.

Then you are against fungibility.  Anything that taints any coin makes people value it differently, which means the fungibility is screwed.  The response to hacking is better proactive security and good old detective work; it is NOT post-hoc blacklisting of ANY sort.

When u xpect something to be used by non-tech people, u cant xpect they'll do detective work before using it. To reach people en masse u must have features with which they can easily get a signal of alert against any impending danger and that needs to be embedded in the design. Else, they wont lose much, we the bitcoiners will. Because, after 2/3 frauds they'll stamp Bitcoin as scammer's money, where we'll keep whining at its irreversible nature by the Grand design.
legendary
Activity: 3766
Merit: 1368
January 28, 2014, 03:02:19 PM
#7
The blockchain is all the Bitcoin cop we need. It's about time that people start to take responsibility for doing due diligence in their transactions, rather than relying on someone else to do it for them. Transact in small amounts or use escrow.

Smiley

hero member
Activity: 793
Merit: 1016
January 27, 2014, 08:20:30 AM
#6
I am deadly against blacklisting any coin, because that goes Satoshi's basic fungibility concept. But we can consider blacklisting addresses, just like we blacklist IP addresses for their notorious character. It does not mean those IP addresses are outside internet, similarly those Bitcoin addresses wont be outside the Bitcoin protocol. Only people will know that they are scammer/thief and deal with their own risk.

Then you are against fungibility.  Anything that taints any coin makes people value it differently, which means the fungibility is screwed.  The response to hacking is better proactive security and good old detective work; it is NOT post-hoc blacklisting of ANY sort.
legendary
Activity: 2282
Merit: 1204
The revolution will be digital
January 27, 2014, 07:01:04 AM
#5
I am deadly against blacklisting any coin, because that goes Satoshi's basic fungibility concept. But we can consider blacklisting addresses, just like we blacklist IP addresses for their notorious character. It does not mean those IP addresses are outside internet, similarly those Bitcoin addresses wont be outside the Bitcoin protocol. Only people will know that they are scammer/thief and deal with their own risk.
sr. member
Activity: 294
Merit: 250
January 26, 2014, 08:57:08 PM
#4
What would be the exact functions of BTC cops and how would they be able to find stolen BTC? I think it would be god to have some regulatory body over shady and dodgy BTC deals and scammers also maybe a blacklist shame and name site so everyone can visit so they can be aware of dodgy peeps trying to scam them. Could be in idea I guess as scammers are prowling now using BTC as their new peddling machine. We had revshares, hyips posing as forex companies and cyclers and now sites are cropping up pretending to be cloud mining companies then bang they gone with our dough.. Cry
sr. member
Activity: 280
Merit: 250
Coolness: ∞
January 26, 2014, 08:20:16 PM
#3
I don't trust anyone who calls Bitcoin "BitCoin".
legendary
Activity: 1512
Merit: 1011
January 26, 2014, 08:10:08 PM
#2
Well ... i'm in the game.

legendary
Activity: 2282
Merit: 1204
The revolution will be digital
January 26, 2014, 06:46:11 PM
#1
With so many Bitcoin stealing complaints around, I think, we need a BitCoin COP. Just like when someone steals our money, we can complain the Govt paid cop. Our very own Bitcoin Foundation will pay this cop. Then I wont have to write against every stealing case "Your Bitcoins are gone. Please play safe next time." Below is the kind of COP I am looking for.



The proposal stand invalid if Bitcoin core developer group disagree with this kinda COP !!!

Update: We have got our COP...

Pages:
Jump to: