Topic: Bitcoin Core 0.10.1 has been released (Read 11797 times)
Awesome !!
Thank you shorena 
if you say it's normal, i'm cool
if you say it's normal, i'm cool
Hello, since the earlier today fork event, and the scary warning i got on the core wallet, i decide to update.
I was using 0.8.6, uninstalled, installed the win64 bit version 0.10.2 with the installer, and the weird thing is that it didn't reindex anything.
only did a very fast check that probably take like 30 seconds, and start updating blocks.
How can I know if its ok?.
I was using 0.8.6, uninstalled, installed the win64 bit version 0.10.2 with the installer, and the weird thing is that it didn't reindex anything.
only did a very fast check that probably take like 30 seconds, and start updating blocks.
How can I know if its ok?.
Thats somewhat expected. The new software is still using the exact same data in a very similar way. There is no reason to rebuild the database or redownload the blockchain.
it seems fully updated to me but if there is a way to check it would be great.
I am runing it on a big ass server with 15K sas drives and xeon processors so a reindex probably will not take much on this machine, but at least i was expecting, i don't know, 5 minutes, but not 30 seconds
I am runing it on a big ass server with 15K sas drives and xeon processors so a reindex probably will not take much on this machine, but at least i was expecting, i don't know, 5 minutes, but not 30 seconds
It was probably just catching up on the missing blocks. You can do a manual reindex if that calms you down. Launch as normal but add -reindex.
E.g. Linux:
bitcoin-cli -reindex from terminal
Windows:
Win + R (for run dialog)
enter c:\Program Files\Bitcoin\bitcoin-qt.exe -reindex
"ok"
Hello, since the earlier today fork event, and the scary warning i got on the core wallet, i decide to update.
I was using 0.8.6, uninstalled, installed the win64 bit version 0.10.2 with the installer, and the weird thing is that it didn't reindex anything.
only did a very fast check that probably take like 30 seconds, and start updating blocks.
How can I know if its ok?.
it seems fully updated to me but if there is a way to check it would be great.
I am runing it on a big ass server with 15K sas drives and xeon processors so a reindex probably will not take much on this machine, but at least i was expecting, i don't know, 5 minutes, but not 30 seconds
I was using 0.8.6, uninstalled, installed the win64 bit version 0.10.2 with the installer, and the weird thing is that it didn't reindex anything.
only did a very fast check that probably take like 30 seconds, and start updating blocks.
How can I know if its ok?.
it seems fully updated to me but if there is a way to check it would be great.
I am runing it on a big ass server with 15K sas drives and xeon processors so a reindex probably will not take much on this machine, but at least i was expecting, i don't know, 5 minutes, but not 30 seconds
I was using old version of Bitcoin Core, today I wanted to update it to ver. 0.10.2. I downloaded installer and copied files to my old BitcoinCore folder to replace them, but now I am stuck on "block verification x%" even though I have blockchain updated. Is this normal?
Edit: Apparently this procedure was meant to check existing blockchain, not download it from the scratch. It last for couple minutes and everything is fine as far as I can tell.
Edit: Apparently this procedure was meant to check existing blockchain, not download it from the scratch. It last for couple minutes and everything is fine as far as I can tell.
Do you think there ever will be a Bitcoin Core 1.0? I think it might go as long as "Bitcoin Core 1.0 beta" 
bitcoin world has been moving so fast that bitcoin core is in subversion under 1 - 0.10.1 but blockchain 2.0 is taking shape
Thank you dear
Happy to hear it As per my study :
In previous version Blocks will be stored on disk out of order (in the order they are received, really), which makes it incompatible with some tools.
where as in new version block use headers-first synchronization method.The block index database will now hold headers for which no block is stored on disk.
Thank you dear
thank you for sharing this information.
your thread helping me so much.
i will try it.
your thread helping me so much.
i will try it.
Wish me luck about to try!!
Fabulous! thanks for sharing, nice information.
Yes thanks for sharing hopefully I will like this better.
Hi, my performance is still extremely poor. I've got a good laptop (i5, 4GB Ram) and it takes ages to load the wallet, then more to sync. It sometimes gets stuck and doesn't download any new block even if I got like 10 peers, so I have to restart it. the .exe is whitelisted on my AV/Firewall.
What can I do to improve performance?
What can I do to improve performance?
Great! thanks for sharing such a nice information.
Could someone explain a bit more about it please, and if you can from the oldest release, thank you very much.
https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Bitcoin_Core
https://bitcoin.org/en/version-history
Could someone explain a bit more about it please, and if you can from the oldest release, thank you very much.
Having a build issue on Debian Squeeze-LTS:
Code:
CXX libbitcoin_util_a-util.o
util.cpp: In function ‘void ShrinkDebugFile()’:
util.cpp:636: warning: ignoring return value of ‘size_t fwrite(const void*, size_t, size_t, FILE*)’, declared with attribute warn_unused_result
util.cpp: In function ‘void SetupEnvironment()’:
util.cpp:728: error: ‘imbue’ is not a member of ‘boost::filesystem::path’
make[2]: *** [libbitcoin_util_a-util.o] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/local/src/bitcoin-core-0.10.1/bitcoin-0.10.1/src'
make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/local/src/bitcoin-core-0.10.1/bitcoin-0.10.1/src'
make: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
Did you fix that?
I have the same problem on CentOS 6 with 0.10.2:
util.cpp:729: error: ‘imbue’ is not a member of ‘boost::filesystem::path’
Jump to: