Topic: Bitcoin Core 0.9.2.1 has been released - page 6. (Read 27416 times)
OS X version have font bug. I cant see addresses
Please get an OS that is still supported.
bitcoin-core is not tested on winXP ?
(it's real question)
Getting closer and closer to 1.0
Can't wait!
Can't wait!
-snip-
System : windows XP 32 bits
-snip-
System : windows XP 32 bits
-snip-
Please get an OS that is still supported.
Good News and Great work. But can someone kindly state the most important updates for the laymen amongst us.
Crash at the shutdown (when i want close normally bitcoin-core).
System : windows XP 32 bits with all windows update installed ( automated : http://www.skyminds.net/pack-de-correctifs-windows-xp-post-sp3 )
Solo-mining with BFGMiner activate.
I use redirection of the blockchain folder (fixed drive).
I use the "no wallet" feature (node system).
old version 0.9.1 don't do this.
Code:
2014-06-17 22:28:12 Added time data, samples 5, offset -1 (+0 minutes)
2014-06-17 22:28:12 nTimeOffset = +0 (+0 minutes)
2014-06-17 22:28:21 Requesting shutdown
2014-06-17 22:28:21 Running Shutdown in thread
2014-06-17 22:28:21 addcon thread interrupt
2014-06-17 22:28:21 dumpaddr thread stop
2014-06-17 22:28:21 msghand thread interrupt
2014-06-17 22:28:21 net thread interrupt
2014-06-17 22:28:22 opencon thread interrupt
2014-06-17 22:28:22 Shutdown : In progress...
2014-06-17 22:28:22
************************
EXCEPTION: N5boost16exception_detail10clone_implINS0_19error_info_injectorINS_6system12system_errorEEEEE
cancel: Le descripteur de fichier fourni n'est pas valide
G:\Bitcoin\bitcoin-qt.exe in Runaway exception
2014-06-17 22:28:37 CDBEnv::EnvShutdown : Error 22 shutting down database environment: Invalid argument
Requesting initialize
Running AppInit2 in thread
2014-06-17 22:29:01
System : windows XP 32 bits with all windows update installed ( automated : http://www.skyminds.net/pack-de-correctifs-windows-xp-post-sp3 )
Solo-mining with BFGMiner activate.
I use redirection of the blockchain folder (fixed drive).
I use the "no wallet" feature (node system).
old version 0.9.1 don't do this.
Great work
Awesome! Thank you core developers! Didn't get the chance to test the 9.2 RC, but will take this for a spin in short time.
Are any of you using both Bitcoin Core and Litecoin QT on the same computer? I am running Litecoin QT from an ultrabook with a dinky SSD harddrive, so I don't want to fill the whole thing up with blockchains..
The font change looks like crap...I'm sure I'll get used to it though.
(Mac OSX)
Can you post a screenshot?(Mac OSX)
The font change looks like crap...I'm sure I'll get used to it though.
(Mac OSX)
(Mac OSX)
Can we leave getinfo untouched in long run too ? Like in Java Vector is deprecated, but we can still have it. I mean the old codes wont crash.
That's possible, but at some point it will lose information. For example, when the wallet is split off to another project, it will no longer contain wallet information. So no matter what you use it for, it will lose its remaining usefulness over time. At a certain point it's better to just remove the call and clean up the code a bit... Nothing yet. They just made new commands that make more sense. The people behind the APIs have time to update their code accordingly so everything goes smoothly when getinfo is removed.
Exactly. It will take a very long time until getinfo is actually removed. There is no hurry. But no new information will be added to it anymore, whereas the new calls provide more (and more specific) information so it makes more sense to use them going forward.Can we leave getinfo untouched in long run too ? Like in Java Vector is deprecated, but we can still have it. I mean the old codes wont crash.
The way I see it, it's much better for you when handling data with the new commands.
Much faster too.
Nothing yet. They just made new commands that make more sense. The people behind the APIs have time to update their code accordingly so everything goes smoothly when getinfo is removed.
Exactly. It will take a very long time until getinfo is actually removed. There is no hurry. But no new information will be added to it anymore, whereas the new calls provide more (and more specific) information so it makes more sense to use them going forward.Can we leave getinfo untouched in long run too ? Like in Java Vector is deprecated, but we can still have it. I mean the old codes wont crash.
Nothing yet. They just made new commands that make more sense. The people behind the APIs have time to update their code accordingly so everything goes smoothly when getinfo is removed.
Exactly. It will take a very long time until getinfo is actually removed. There is no hurry. But no new information will be added to it anymore, whereas the new calls provide more (and more specific) information so it makes more sense to use them going forward. GooD News 
Why do u think `getinfo` is hodge-podge ?
Well it combines information from different subsystems - the wallet, P2P networking, block chain handling, etc. It doesn't fit in the more modular approach that we have in mind. It is also slow to acquire all the locks and gather the information.Why do u think `getinfo` is hodge-podge ?
What would happen to the APIs using getinfo data ?
Nothing yet. They just made new commands that make more sense. The people behind the APIs have time to update their code accordingly so everything goes smoothly when getinfo is removed.
---------------
Optionally add third party links to transaction context menu
Had
GooD News
Why do u think `getinfo` is hodge-podge ?
Well it combines information from different subsystems - the wallet, P2P networking, block chain handling, etc. It doesn't fit in the more modular approach that we have in mind. It is also slow to acquire all the locks and gather the information.Why do u think `getinfo` is hodge-podge ?
What would happen to the APIs using getinfo data ?
GooD News
Great work. Thanks for information
Great work. Thanks for information
news info good
great work thanks
great work thanks
I was suspicious at first but then I realised where the links were, I'll wait for an announcement on Bitcointalk before I click anything though lol 
Jump to: