Topic: Bitcoin Core 0.9.3 has been released - page 4. (Read 109205 times)
Thanks, really nice
No issues (7-zip wallet to don't destroy when copy).
I use cold storage wallet of bitcoin core because of this ...
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.8608715
I use cold storage wallet of bitcoin core because of this ...
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.8608715
Are there any issues with using past archived wallet.dat or will one just send from previous wallet to new address?
clean orphan blocks.
optimize upload of blocks.
and many more for the others ...
optimize upload of blocks.
and many more for the others ...
I don't understand the meaning of installing a new version. Can anybody explain me 
Wow seems interesting 
Kudos to everyone who contributed to the continuous improvement of the network!
BUG: Installs but won't verify or open in OS X apparently because not signed by Gavin:
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/4992
good tnx,will try https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/4992
look forward the next move!
I'd like to make a suggestion to have the last 5 letters in the public address in red(or whatever color) when sending bitcoin.
Like this: 1Hg1Ph176mtcBPcpVRpGwjxB74N2nCqkyZ
This makes it easier to identify and make sure you're sending money to the right address.
Maybe even use this function in receiving addresses.
Like this: 1Hg1Ph176mtcBPcpVRpGwjxB74N2nCqkyZ
This makes it easier to identify and make sure you're sending money to the right address.
Maybe even use this function in receiving addresses.
Amaaaaazing
Thank you, great job i hope someday we see the release of btc 2.0 
i hope someday we see the release of btc 2.0
Thanks, great job
In blockchain directory, much more files will be created. Any other disadvantage? BTW I running Bitcoin core with 100 Mb cache on winXP 32bit with 1GB total system memory and it runs fine
- but I dont have other programs open when Bitcoin core is running because it would start swapping the memory to hddFor me, it need long time to synchronize with the network, bro. How about?.
It takes me about half hour for every full day I have to synchronize, not much problem when I open the wallet daily.
Is there truly a benefit to running Bitcoin Core, rather than another wallet software?
QT is not actually the most beneficial I would expect Armory to be a more secure solution than Bitcoin-Qt, because it allows you to sign the transactions from an offline computer. This means that the private keys never need to be stored on a computer that is connected to the internet.
I think your problem might be related to the limited amount of memory 32-bit Windows'es are able to access. If you were on XP 64, I'd tell you to stick with it and not downgrade your PC to 7Garbage or the 8th Abomination.
perhaps, but i already decrease the cache to 4Mb to avoid the "by the hell" comsumption of RAM of the start or the bitcoin core.
cache 4Mb = 200Mb of RAM used.
cache 100Mb = 1,2Gb of RAM used.
In blockchain directory, much more files will be created. Any other disadvantage? BTW I running Bitcoin core with 100 Mb cache on winXP 32bit with 1GB total system memory and it runs fine
- but I dont have other programs open when Bitcoin core is running because it would start swapping the memory to hddFor me, it need long time to synchronize with the network, bro. How about?.
I think your problem might be related to the limited amount of memory 32-bit Windows'es are able to access. If you were on XP 64, I'd tell you to stick with it and not downgrade your PC to 7Garbage or the 8th Abomination.
perhaps, but i already decrease the cache to 4Mb to avoid the "by the hell" comsumption of RAM of the start or the bitcoin core.
cache 4Mb = 200Mb of RAM used.
cache 100Mb = 1,2Gb of RAM used.
In blockchain directory, much more files will be created. Any other disadvantage? BTW I running Bitcoin core with 100 Mb cache on winXP 32bit with 1GB total system memory and it runs fine
- but I dont have other programs open when Bitcoin core is running because it would start swapping the memory to hdd
Is there truly a benefit to running Bitcoin Core, rather than another wallet software?
I think your problem might be related to the limited amount of memory 32-bit Windows'es are able to access. If you were on XP 64, I'd tell you to stick with it and not downgrade your PC to 7Garbage or the 8th Abomination.
perhaps, but i already decrease the cache to 4Mb to avoid the "by the hell" comsumption of RAM of the start or the bitcoin core.
cache 4Mb = 200Mb of RAM used.
cache 100Mb = 1,2Gb of RAM used.
I remember that it had .dll's etc .. why it's just an .exe only this time
anyway , is there is anyway to bypass that Synchronisation with the Network bullshits ?
It takes forever
anyway , is there is anyway to bypass that Synchronisation with the Network bullshits ?
It takes forever Jump to: