Topic: Bitcoin Core vs. Bitcoin Classic - page 4. (Read 4849 times)
ill stay with core at the moment.
There is something I don't understand.
Bitcoin core is the name of the program used to validate transactions and mine coins no?
It means that if two programs like bitcoin core and bitcoin classic are launched, they're both creating coins and validating transactions no?
Doesn't it mean that each transaction is duplicated? And that we thus can spend each coin twice?
I probably misunderstood something though :/
Bitcoin core is the name of the program used to validate transactions and mine coins no?
It means that if two programs like bitcoin core and bitcoin classic are launched, they're both creating coins and validating transactions no?
Doesn't it mean that each transaction is duplicated? And that we thus can spend each coin twice?
I probably misunderstood something though :/
if the majority of the nodes are not running classic, then clasic is simply an altcoin, that some miners are deciding to use
so no there is no double bitcoin ever
Ok. But what happens if majority of nodes run classic?
Will I just you know, lose my coins? If I don't expect the success of classic, bitcoin might just disappear and be replaced by... Bitcoin2?
And it may be an altcoin but it's an altcoin named bitcoin no? ^^
There is something I don't understand.
Bitcoin core is the name of the program used to validate transactions and mine coins no?
It means that if two programs like bitcoin core and bitcoin classic are launched, they're both creating coins and validating transactions no?
Doesn't it mean that each transaction is duplicated? And that we thus can spend each coin twice?
I probably misunderstood something though :/
Bitcoin core is the name of the program used to validate transactions and mine coins no?
It means that if two programs like bitcoin core and bitcoin classic are launched, they're both creating coins and validating transactions no?
Doesn't it mean that each transaction is duplicated? And that we thus can spend each coin twice?
I probably misunderstood something though :/
if the majority of the nodes are not running classic, then clasic is simply an altcoin, that some miners are deciding to use
so no there is no double bitcoin ever
There is something I don't understand.
Bitcoin core is the name of the program used to validate transactions and mine coins no?
It means that if two programs like bitcoin core and bitcoin classic are launched, they're both creating coins and validating transactions no?
Doesn't it mean that each transaction is duplicated? And that we thus can spend each coin twice?
I probably misunderstood something though :/
Bitcoin core is the name of the program used to validate transactions and mine coins no?
It means that if two programs like bitcoin core and bitcoin classic are launched, they're both creating coins and validating transactions no?
Doesn't it mean that each transaction is duplicated? And that we thus can spend each coin twice?
I probably misunderstood something though :/
bitcoinocracy has been spammed between every blockstream fanboy and affiliate imaginable.. thus not a fair indicator.
even Hilary clinton can get 100 people on a bus and fill a room to appear there is lots of cheering voices when she talks.
think about her champagne events to garner donations for her campaign.. yea lots of deep pockets are VIP'd with direct mailshot invites, but that doesnt mean the whole country wants her
now, as for the node count websites.
a fairer display would be to separate out bitcoin-core 0.12 from the older versions. as the older versions would represent an "undecided vote" where they havnt upgraded to 0.12 or any other implementation.
trying to combine 7 years of implementations into the bitcoin-core band camp is misleading.
so whomever owns these peer-crawler websites. separate out versions that are not 0.12 and give them the name "undecided"
even Hilary clinton can get 100 people on a bus and fill a room to appear there is lots of cheering voices when she talks.
think about her champagne events to garner donations for her campaign.. yea lots of deep pockets are VIP'd with direct mailshot invites, but that doesnt mean the whole country wants her
now, as for the node count websites.
a fairer display would be to separate out bitcoin-core 0.12 from the older versions. as the older versions would represent an "undecided vote" where they havnt upgraded to 0.12 or any other implementation.
trying to combine 7 years of implementations into the bitcoin-core band camp is misleading.
so whomever owns these peer-crawler websites. separate out versions that are not 0.12 and give them the name "undecided"
Thanks for the link!
Toomincoin is Classic?
Yes.
Two brothers and a bunch of shady guys like Marshall Long for instance are behind Classic.Furthermore the list of comeptent developers supporting it is small.
I will stay with Bitcoin core as they are having the most competence and understanding of Bitcoin plus the majority of developers backing it.
From a technical point of view there's no doubt imo why I should switch the client.
Regarding of what Bitcoin should be in the future I think so as well. A decentralized settlement layer where on top of that other layers and services (3rd party as well if wished and needed) can be build.But not the other way around.We already have a paypal out there.
So should Toomincoin win out what exactly is the fear, loss of direction, centralization and capitalistic goals?
If Toomincoin wins, the reasons for Bitcon's existence (precluding the moral hazards of majoritarianism) are extinguished.
Honey Badger cannot live as a slave. If the Gavinistas put him in chains, he will simply die. They cannot force him to give a shit.
The large coin holders that support Bitcoin will dump like there is literally no tomorrow, because they didn't sign up for ToominCoin.
Here is the cryptographically assured proof: http://bitcoinocracy.com/arguments/decided.
Toomincoin is Classic?
Yes.
Two brothers and a bunch of shady guys like Marshall Long for instance are behind Classic.Furthermore the list of comeptent developers supporting it is small.
I will stay with Bitcoin core as they are having the most competence and understanding of Bitcoin plus the majority of developers backing it.
From a technical point of view there's no doubt imo why I should switch the client.
Regarding of what Bitcoin should be in the future I think so as well. A decentralized settlement layer where on top of that other layers and services (3rd party as well if wished and needed) can be build.But not the other way around.We already have a paypal out there.
So should Toomincoin win out what exactly is the fear, loss of direction, centralization and capitalistic goals?
Toomincoin is Classic?
Yes.
Two brothers and a bunch of shady guys like Marshall Long for instance are behind Classic.Furthermore the list of comeptent developers supporting it is small.
I will stay with Bitcoin core as they are having the most competence and understanding of Bitcoin plus the majority of developers backing it.
From a technical point of view there's no doubt imo why I should switch the client.
Regarding of what Bitcoin should be in the future I think so as well. A decentralized settlement layer where on top of that other layers and services (3rd party as well if wished and needed) can be build.But not the other way around.We already have a paypal out there.
Toomincoin is Classic?
I am still with Core, assuming that this technology won't be replaced...
It's not yet decided by everyone to move with Classic, so I would still be going with Core as it's still the best...
It's not yet decided by everyone to move with Classic, so I would still be going with Core as it's still the best...
core is still winning, by a lot
there is basically no competition
there is basically no competition
Again, node numbers mean absolutely nothing. Here's a tutorial on how to run 3000 completely legitimate nodes simultaneously. 
https://www.reddit.com/r/bitcoinxt/comments/3iao3i/how_to_run_3000_completely_legit_full_nodes_aka
https://www.reddit.com/r/bitcoinxt/comments/3iao3i/how_to_run_3000_completely_legit_full_nodes_aka
When software doesn't even allow creating blocks under their use, the only thing we can only rely in is node numbers...
Again, node numbers mean absolutely nothing. Here's a tutorial on how to run 3000 completely legitimate nodes simultaneously.
https://www.reddit.com/r/bitcoinxt/comments/3iao3i/how_to_run_3000_completely_legit_full_nodes_aka
https://www.reddit.com/r/bitcoinxt/comments/3iao3i/how_to_run_3000_completely_legit_full_nodes_aka
haha, very interesting that there is a post on reddit for it
if i am not mistaken same thing happened with bitcoin xt too?
Again, node numbers mean absolutely nothing. Here's a tutorial on how to run 3000 completely legitimate nodes simultaneously.
https://www.reddit.com/r/bitcoinxt/comments/3iao3i/how_to_run_3000_completely_legit_full_nodes_aka
https://www.reddit.com/r/bitcoinxt/comments/3iao3i/how_to_run_3000_completely_legit_full_nodes_aka
Changelog? I don't see why their node count had a bump... Maybe nodes of their own? Just someone setting up many? Or maybe just lack of updates on XT and users switching from XT to Classic (seems to kind of be the case if we look at the charts)
I'll definitely switch if they can deploy and have their changes running in the network faster than Core
They still say their releases are experimental and not suitable for mining...
I'll definitely switch if they can deploy and have their changes running in the network faster than Core
They still say their releases are experimental and not suitable for mining...
Bitcoin Classic Nodes Surge Following Beta 2 Release: https://news.bitcoin.com/bitcoin-classic-nodes-surge-following-beta-2-release/
https://news.bitcoin.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/classic.png
Are you going to switch? (or may already have)
https://news.bitcoin.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/classic.png
Are you going to switch? (or may already have)
Jump to: