Topic: <Bitcoin Creation> Dr. Craig Faketoshi Failed another Satoshi Test Again. (Read 471 times)

This moment itself should be enough to put the whole thing to bed, aside from the fact that ever essence of his being is so far from being what Satoshi's portrayed himself to be and stand for in the first place. Spam these images everywhere the guy talks, is talked about or presents himself in any way shape or form in the future.

Faketoshi will continue to exist so long as people are willing to play with his coin and give him money. More and more however people are dropping it.

Today's news: https://decrypt.co/118951/robinhood-delist-bitcoin-sv-market-sell

Sooner or later he will go after someone who he thinks is an easy target legally and they will bury him in lawsuits. Yes, he can keep sliming his way to other places but for the most part you can only run from your debts for so long until they do catch up with you.

-Dave

This guy simply makes me sick. He is just a fraudster looking to have his name linked to the creation of the project of the century. I seriously dount that he ever made  a contribution to the development of Bitcoin. Craig is nothing but a stooge that is trying to get ahead of the real satoshi. Anyways, the real proof he is still not the real thing is that the NSA could not care less aboit him.

This is a very easy to achieve since he claims to be Satoshi Nakamoto, Can Craig send out just 1 Bitcoin from the Bitcoin holding's Satoshi Nakamoto mined? That is, transfer to a new wallet entirely let's see if he really has the keys as he claims.
A day, time and hour should be fixed for him to do that, then if he does you know what it is right?!

He's not original, trying to get fame and attraction by making claims of being Satoshi, he should shut up, liar!

It's not just "highly unlikely", Craig Wright is DEFINITELY NOT Satoshi, whether or not he's holding the keys, or if he can sign a message right now, he simply DID NOT invent Bitcoin.

I have another tin-foil-hat-on theory. Satoshi Nakamoto is Gavin Andresen, and destroying his own reputation within the Bitcoin community made him "to be the unlikeliest" to be Satoshi, just how the real Satoshi wants it.

It is obvious that Craig Wright is not satoshi, and anyone who knows bitcoin would be already aware of it. This doesn't even require all that much information, just tell him to write from one of his old addresses and if he can then he is satoshi if he can't then he is not, simple as that.

This isn't rocket science, just a signed message from an old wallet would fix it all. He could lie as many times as possible on why he can't do that, but that doesn't change the fact that they are all lies and nothing more. We are not going to learn who satoshi was, and that’s that, which is a good thing. If we knew who he was then it would have been a big problem.

Lol, i stopped following this man a long time ago, and i stopped reading news about him as well, for it is obvious his is not Satoshi and can never be, he himself knows he is not Satoshi,  he also know that the crypto community will never accept him or assume him to be Satoshi, what he is doing now is just enjoying the spotlight, the more he keeps lying, and people keep giving him audience , the more popular he becomes, this is a simple strategy talentless people use to become popular when they so desire to be but are not musicians, movie actors or politicians.
When they have no legitimate way of becoming popular, and their profession is not one that can push them to that height, they look for ways to play on people's intelligence to get to the spotlight, this is exactly what Dr. Craig write is doing. 

This is lovely. To me, it seems highly unlikely that Craig is Satoshi, as there are various ways to convince people of it if not prove the identity once and for all, but he did none of that and is often contradicting himself, making things up and pretending to be a very smart guy when he isn't. I sent the thread to my friend who somehow is very confident that Craig is definitely Satoshi, but that it's Craig's incredible arrogance (not complete lack of evidence, lol) that pushes people away so strongly that they refuse to believe that he is Satoshi.

"Good amount of legitimacy" will be more subjective. I'm absolutely very sure that the Flat-Earthers in Bitcoin Land would celebrate, and continue the long con, BUT what if Carlos Matos of Bitconnect held the keys and signed a message, "proving" he is Satoshi. Would that also receive a good amount of legitimacy? I doubt that person could code the Alphabet.

I had always thought that Craig was a wise man but nowadays he has continued to prove to me that he isn't a wise man. Someone claiming to be satoshi should have hired someone who will man has social media handles. Someone who has good knowledge of Bitcoin in order to at least make us have a second thoughts before doubting him, instead he decided to present himself, knowing that he has no basic knowledge of Bitcoin. This is not the first time I have read his blunders where he totally contradicted satoshi.

Eventually it will all come to a head or as we say here "run out of road" and the overwhelming
opinion by EVERYBODY will come to bear so heavy on him and his backers they there will be no
smoke and mirrors, no shady tricks or sleight of hand dealings to rely on - it's just a matter
of time - the clock is ticking.

There's a reason why the crypto community calls Craig as Faketoshi. He has tried to claim the identity of Satoshi so many times but in vain.
All his attempts were proven false since he was unable to prove himself. This is why he had a very bad name in the crypto community.
So it's not surprising to see him fail again. We all are sure he will fail all his future tests as well.

the point is there is no choice, no if, no option, no could've of a maybe

he is not satoshi END OF
he has no keys END OF

point is people still use terminology as if there is a question mark beside CSW

its been 6 years. just declare it in your own heads
confirm it and make it immutable.. HE IS NOT

its no longer about proving he isnt satoshi..

its now showing how much of a fraudster CSW is as CSW
how much the man known as CSW needs to be punished for being a fraudster

trying to claw it back to debates about "we need to prove he isnt satoshi" is just adding a troll ?? at the end of the sentence which the silly idiots grab onto as if its not yet proven

so lets just use the proper terminology.. he isnt. no question. he just isnt
now its time to call him out for his crimes, lies and frauds

no one actually cared about someone claiming to be satoshi (just name grabbing) we had phases where we would all say "we are satoshi"
the point is the utility of the identity of having access to coins and able to maybe tweak code somehow was peoples concern about the identity.. well that identity debate is over. CSW is just NOT him.. end of

so now lets poke at the stuff CSW is. the malicious stuff, criminal and fraud stuff
lets wake up his disciples to how much the scammer has scammed his fangirls. get them to realise they were scammed financially and get them to start suing him

get his own crowd to start circling him . but not with kisses and hugs. but with court summons. make his world shrink

..
we ow need to stop with the "proof of satoshi" conversations
and begin the fraudster conversations

much like what people in 2019 started doing with the cryptoqueen(one coin) scam
no more playing identity tennis.. and instead start finding criminal holes to poke out that will get CSW in legal trouble.

here is one idea
done tweet ayres asking
"do you think csw is satoshi"
or
"what proof have you seen"

instead ask
"when are you going to sue CSW for scamming you"
"have you tried to get your cash out before its gone"

make it so that his fangirls have a deadline to test their own investment viability. how easily they can cash out and what excuses CSW uses.. start to get his buddies to start eciting

try to wake them up to then stand over CSW as a dark shadow for different reasons

Of course, there are those who would believe him if he could provide any concrete proof, but there are also those who do not need such proof at all. Let's remember what one of Satoshi's closest associate said at the time this story started.


Someone can say whatever they want, but Satoshi obviously surrounded himself with some people he shouldn't have trusted, which led us to the fact that some still use it to their advantage today.

I guess that's true, but he could've at least received a good amount of legitimacy(hence more supporters) if he actually had the Satoshi keys and signed a message. But alas, he's all talk because he actually doesn't have the keys.

The only thing that should surprise anyone would be that Faketoshi manages to prove any of his claims, and not that every day he falls into a new trap because he is so entangled in a lie that he can no longer do anything but lie more. The only thing that interests me about Faketoshi are some new trials, everything else is a joke that keeps him on the surface for free.

He should be hit where it hurts the most, which is his bank account, regardless of whether it is his account or the accounts of his sponsors. If only there was some consensus in the Bitcoin community to unite and sue Faketoshi, and put an end to this once and for all.

Sometimes the best form of defense is to attack; not paying attention to him will not or has not benefited the bitcoin community; the best way is to continue exposing him to aspiring bitcoiners as the fraud he is.

@cr1776 He claimed he misplaced/destroyed the key to the 1.1 bitcoin, which is why he's trying to get it through the back door, attempting to force the bitcoin developers to allocate him the first block reward. lol

But franky1, it doesn't matter if Craig Wright held Satoshi's keys or not, because even if he did hold Satoshi's keys, he still WOULDN'T BE THE ACTUAL INVENTOR of Bitcoin. It's not about who is holding the keys, because the keys cannot make someone assume another person's actual identity.

Another funny Twitter exchange from Craig Wright, with Edward Snowden.

Yeah! Whenever I see his name again, I thought of him as a serial liar where everything will come from his mouth are just rubbish and false claim. This guy never thought of the most hardest thing to do is to pretend as Satoshi where you need to prove it by answering the hardest questions and the hardest mysteries of bitcoins that only the real Satoshi can answer them all.

Probably one of the worst frauds ever? You'd figure that if a certain person has invested so much time and money in pretending to be a certain person that he should be at least spending a lot more time in making sure what he's saying is accurate.